Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Urology ; 143: 181-185, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To guide treatment decisions for symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy. We examined our experience to create a treatment algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated all patients that underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2003 to 2012. Presenting signs, management and treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 8081 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2003 to 2012, we identified 123 (1.5%) patients who developed a symptomatic lymphocele, 70 sterile and 53 infected. Percutaneous aspiration was performed in 26 of 123 (21%) patients, of those, 100% recurred. A drain was placed in 86 of 123 (70%) patients for a median of 13 vs 33 days for the infected and sterile lymphocele groups, respectively (P <.001). The median duration of drainage for sterile lymphoceles was 15 vs 58 days for lymphoceles <10 cm vs ≥10 cm (P <.001). Percutaneous drainage was successful in 93% and 86% of patients with infected and sterile lymphoceles, respectively. Laparoscopic unroofing was performed in 18 sterile lymphocele patients (15%) with a success rate of 94%. CONCLUSION: Aspiration of symptomatic lymphoceles should be reserved for diagnostic purposes due to a high risk of recurrence. Infected lymphoceles are optimally treated with drain placement and antibiotics, and have excellent resolution rates. While sterile lymphoceles <10 cm can be successfully managed with drain placement, if drainage and sclerotherapy fail, laparoscopic unroofing should be considered. For patients with sterile lymphoceles ≥10 cm there should be a shared decision-making process to weigh the risk of a protracted course if a drain is utilized vs upfront laparoscopic unroofing.


Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymphocele/etiology , Lymphocele/therapy , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Aged , Algorithms , Drainage , Humans , Laparoscopy , Lymphocele/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Symptom Assessment , Treatment Outcome
2.
Urol Pract ; 5(5): 332-333, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37312318
3.
Eur Urol ; 71(3): 340-348, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after radiotherapy (RT) is dependent on accurate localization of the site of recurrent disease. OBJECTIVE: To describe the anatomic patterns and clinical features associated with CaP recurrence following RT identified on advanced imaging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 184 patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RT for CaP. INTERVENTION: C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CholPET). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Recurrence patterns were classified as pelvic soft tissue only (as a surrogate for potentially salvageable disease) versus any extrapelvic disease, and clinical features were compared between patterns. Multivariable logistic regression was used to generate a predictive nomogram for extrapelvic recurrence. Discrimination was assessed with a c-index. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Recurrence site was identified in 161 (87%) patients, with 95 (59%) sites histologically confirmed. Factors associated with the detection of recurrence included the difference between PSA nadir and PSA at CholPET (odds ratio: 1.30, p<0.01) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk classification (odds ratio: 10.83, p=0.03). One hundred (54.3%) patients recurred in the pelvic soft tissue only, while 61 (33%) had extrapelvic recurrence. Of 21 patients who underwent CholPET prior to meeting the Phoenix criteria of biochemical failure, 15 (71%) had recurrence identified on CholPET with 11 localized to the pelvis. On multivariable analysis, the difference between PSA nadir and PSA at CholPET, time from RT, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group were predictive of recurrence outside of the pelvis, and a nomogram was generated with a c-index of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: CholPET identified the site of recurrence in 87% of patients with a rising PSA after RT; most commonly within the pelvis in potentially salvageable locations. A predictive nomogram was generated, and pending external validation, this may aid in assessing the risk of disease beyond the pelvis. These findings underscore the importance of advanced imaging when considering management strategies for patients with a rising PSA following primary RT. PATIENT SUMMARY: We identified anatomic patterns of recurrence in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen after radiotherapy using C-11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Most recurrences were localized to the pelvis and we were able to generate a tool to aid in disease localization prior to evaluation with advanced imaging.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Nomograms , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Carbon Radioisotopes , Choline , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Urol ; 197(1): 129-134, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27449262

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We identify sites and patterns of cancer recurrence in patients with post-prostatectomy biochemical relapse using 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and endorectal coil multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2015, 2,466 men underwent choline positron emission tomography for suspected prostate cancer relapse at our institution. Of these men 202 did not receive hormone or radiation therapy, underwent imaging with choline positron emission tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and were found to have disease recurrence. Overall patterns of recurrence were described, and factors associated with local only recurrence were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen at positive scan was 2.3 ng/ml (IQR 1.4-5.5) with a median time from prostate specific antigen relapse to lesion visualization of 15 months (IQR 4.8-34.2). Of these 202 men 68 (33%) exhibited local only, 45 (22%) local plus metastatic and 89 (45%) metastatic only relapse. Pelvic node only relapse was observed in 39 (19%) men. Median prostate specific antigen at positive imaging for patients with local only, metastatic only and local plus metastatic relapse was 2.3, 2.7 and 2.2 ng/ml (p=0.46), with a median interval from biochemical recurrence to positive scan of 33.5, 7.0 and 15.0 months, respectively (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis time from biochemical recurrence to positive imaging was independently associated with local only recurrence (OR 1.10 for every 6-month increase, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Combined choline positron emission tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy reveals an anatomically diverse pattern of recurrence. These findings have implications for optimizing the salvage treatment of patients with prostate cancer with relapse following surgery.


Subject(s)
Carbon Radioisotopes , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Biopsy, Needle , Choline , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Prognosis , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Salvage Therapy/methods , Survival Analysis
5.
Curr Urol Rep ; 16(6): 34, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25894495

ABSTRACT

Immunotherapy for the treatment of malignant neoplasms has made significant progress over the last 20 years. Multiple molecular targets and clinical agents have been developed recently, particularly in the field of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Sipuleucel-T is currently the only FDA approved immunotherapy for prostate cancer. PSA-TRICOM (Prostvac) currently has a phase III randomized trial underway after a phase II trial showed an improvement in overall survival. Interestingly, both these agents showed improvement in overall survival with no measurable change in disease state, leading to significant controversy as the utility of these agents in prostate cancer. Ipilimumab revealed a benefit for a sub-cohort of men in a post-docetaxel group and is currently undergoing investigation in a pre-docetaxel group. There are a number of other targets such as PD-1 which have shown effectiveness in other neoplasms that will likely be investigated in the future for use in prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Docetaxel , Humans , Ipilimumab , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Taxoids/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...