Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 8(3): e55435, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23536756

ABSTRACT

Among approximately 1000 adenoviruses from chimpanzees and bonobos studied recently, the Pan Adenovirus type 3 (PanAd3, isolated from a bonobo, Pan paniscus) has one of the best profiles for a vaccine vector, combining potent transgene immunogenicity with minimal pre-existing immunity in the human population. In this study, we inserted into a replication defective PanAd3 a transgene expressing a fusion protein of conserved influenza antigens nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix 1 (M1). We then studied antibody and T cell responses as well as protection from challenge infection in a mouse model. A single intranasal administration of PanAd3-NPM1 vaccine induced strong antibody and T cell responses, and protected against high dose lethal influenza virus challenge. Thus PanAd3 is a promising candidate vector for vaccines, including universal influenza vaccines.


Subject(s)
Adenoviruses, Simian/immunology , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Genetic Vectors/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Adenoviruses, Human/immunology , Adenoviruses, Simian/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antigens, Viral/genetics , Cross Reactions/immunology , Female , Gene Expression , Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage , Genetic Vectors/genetics , Humans , Immunity, Mucosal , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Mice , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleocapsid Proteins , Nucleophosmin , Pan paniscus , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/chemistry , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Viral Core Proteins/chemistry , Viral Core Proteins/genetics , Viral Core Proteins/immunology , Viral Matrix Proteins/chemistry , Viral Matrix Proteins/genetics , Viral Matrix Proteins/immunology
2.
PLoS One ; 6(7): e21937, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21789196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rapid spread of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus (pH1N1) highlighted problems associated with relying on strain-matched vaccines. A lengthy process of strain identification, manufacture, and testing is required for current strain-matched vaccines and delays vaccine availability. Vaccines inducing immunity to conserved viral proteins could be manufactured and tested in advance and provide cross-protection against novel influenza viruses until strain-matched vaccines became available. Here we test two prototype vaccines for cross-protection against the recent pandemic virus. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were intranasally immunized with a single dose of cold-adapted (ca) influenza viruses from 1977 or recombinant adenoviruses (rAd) expressing 1934 nucleoprotein (NP) and consensus matrix 2 (M2) (NP+M2-rAd). Antibodies against the M2 ectodomain (M2e) were seen in NP+M2-rAd immunized BALB/c but not C57BL/6 mice, and cross-reacted with pH1N1 M2e. The ca-immunized mice did not develop antibodies against M2e. Despite sequence differences between vaccine and challenge virus NP and M2e epitopes, extensive cross-reactivity of lung T cells with pH1N1 peptides was detected following immunization. Both ca and NP+M2-rAd immunization protected BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice against challenge with a mouse-adapted pH1N1 virus. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Cross-protective vaccines such as NP+M2-rAd and ca virus are effective against pH1N1 challenge within 3 weeks of immunization. Protection was not dependent on recognition of the highly variable external viral proteins and could be achieved with a single vaccine dose. The rAd vaccine was superior to the ca vaccine by certain measures, justifying continued investigation of this experimental vaccine even though ca vaccine is already available. This study highlights the potential for cross-protective vaccines as a public health option early in an influenza pandemic.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/immunology , Adenoviridae/immunology , Cross Protection/immunology , Immunity/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cold Temperature , Epitopes/chemistry , Epitopes/immunology , Lung/immunology , Lung/pathology , Lung/virology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Molecular Sequence Data , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/blood , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Pandemics , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccination , Viral Load/immunology
3.
PLoS One ; 5(10): e13162, 2010 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20976273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sudden emergence of novel influenza viruses is a global public health concern. Conventional influenza vaccines targeting the highly variable surface glycoproteins hemagglutinin and neuraminidase must antigenically match the emerging strain to be effective. In contrast, "universal" vaccines targeting conserved viral components could be used regardless of viral strain or subtype. Previous approaches to universal vaccination have required protracted multi-dose immunizations. Here we evaluate a single dose universal vaccine strategy using recombinant adenoviruses (rAd) expressing the conserved influenza virus antigens matrix 2 and nucleoprotein. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In BALB/c mice, administration of rAd via the intranasal route was superior to intramuscular immunization for induction of mucosal responses and for protection against highly virulent H1N1, H3N2, or H5N1 influenza virus challenge. Mucosally vaccinated mice not only survived, but had little morbidity and reduced lung virus titers. Protection was observed as early as 2 weeks post-immunization, and lasted at least 10 months, as did antibodies and lung T cells with activated phenotypes. Virus-specific IgA correlated with but was not essential for protection, as demonstrated in studies with IgA-deficient animals. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Mucosal administration of NP and M2-expressing rAd vectors provided rapid and lasting protection from influenza viruses in a subtype-independent manner. Such vaccines could be used in the interval between emergence of a new virus strain and availability of strain-matched vaccines against it. This strikingly effective single-dose vaccination thus represents a candidate off-the-shelf vaccine for emergency use during an influenza pandemic.


Subject(s)
Immunity, Mucosal , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Administration, Intranasal , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/virology , Virulence
4.
Vaccine ; 27(47): 6512-21, 2009 Nov 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19729082

ABSTRACT

Immunization against conserved virus components induces broad, heterosubtypic protection against diverse influenza A viruses, providing a strategy for controlling unexpected outbreaks or pandemics until strain-matched vaccines become available. This study characterized immunization to nucleoprotein (NP) and matrix 2 (M2) by DNA priming followed by parenteral or mucosal boosting in mice and ferrets. DNA vaccination followed by boosting with antigen-matched recombinant adenovirus (rAd) or cold-adapted (ca) influenza virus provided robust protection against virulent H1N1 and H5N1 challenges. Compared to other boosts, mucosal rAd induced stronger IgA responses, more virus-specific activated T-cells in the lung, and better protection against morbidity following challenge even eight months post-boost. In ferrets, both mucosal and parenteral rAd boosting protected from lethal H5N1 challenge. These findings demonstrate potent protection by vaccination highly focused on conserved antigens and identify immune response measures in mice that differed among vaccinations and correlated with outcome.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Female , Ferrets , Immunity, Mucosal , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunologic Memory , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Nucleocapsid Proteins , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , RNA-Binding Proteins/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Viral Core Proteins/immunology , Viral Matrix Proteins/immunology
5.
FASEB J ; 19(3): 440-2, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15640280

ABSTRACT

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) has gained widespread use as a tool to visualize spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression in vivo. However, it is not generally accepted that GFP can also be used as a quantitative reporter of gene expression. We report that GFP is a reliable reporter of gene expression in individual eukaryotic cells when fluorescence is measured by flow cytometry. Two pieces of evidence support this conclusion: GFP fluorescence increases in direct proportion to the GFP gene copy number delivered to cells by a replication-defective adenovirus vector, Ad.CMV-GFP, and the intensity of GFP fluorescence is directly proportional to GFP mRNA abundance in cells. This conclusion is further supported by the fact that the induction of GFP gene expression from two inducible promoters (i.e., the TRE and ICP0 promoters) is readily detected by flow cytometric measurement of GFP fluorescent intensity. Collectively, the results presented herein indicate that GFP fluorescence is a reliable and quantitative reporter of underlying differences in gene expression.


Subject(s)
Eukaryotic Cells/metabolism , Fluorescence , Gene Expression , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Adenoviridae/genetics , Animals , Blotting, Northern , Chlorocebus aethiops , Doxycycline/pharmacology , Eukaryotic Cells/chemistry , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression/drug effects , Genetic Vectors , Herpes Simplex Virus Protein Vmw65/genetics , Herpes Simplex Virus Protein Vmw65/physiology , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Transfection , Vero Cells
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...