ABSTRACT
Objetivo: comparar la metodología PIMA con la citometría de flujo convencional para el recuento de linfocitos CD4 en pacientes con infección por HIV. Métodos: se realizaron determinaciones pareadas en sangre veno-sa de pacientes con HIV y se comparó la correlación entre ambos re-sultados. Resultados: se realizaron 223 determinaciones en forma pareadas. La concordancia fue muy buena, con una correlación lineal de Pear-son de 0,974, correlación por rangos de Spearman de 0,971 y con un coeficiente de determinación lineal (R cuadrado) de 0,949 (p < 0,01). El coeficiente de correlación intraclases para las medidas individua-les fue de 0,965 (IC 95 % 0,926-0,980) y para medidas promedio 0,982 (IC95 % 0,961-0,990). El coeficiente de variación para medidas duplicadas fue bajo siendo 11,4 %.Discusión: este estudio demuestra una buena correlación entre la de-terminación de células CD4 con el sistema PIMA frente a la citometría de flujo y apoya el uso de estas metodologías donde no hay acceso a citometría convencional
Objective: To compare PIMA methodology to the standard CD4 FACSCalibur flow cytometry for CD4 testing. Method: Paired blood samples were collectedamong HIV patients and tested using PIMA and Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur. Results: 223 samples were studied in parallel. There was a high concordance, being Pearson Linear Correlation 0.974, the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient 0.971. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for individual measures was 0.965 (95%CI 0.926-0.980) and for average measures 0.982 (95%CI 0.961-0.990). There was a low coefficient of variation from duplicate measurements (11.4%).Conclusion: This study shows a good correlation between the PIMA CD4 count and the Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur. By being a point of care methodology that produces same-day results, PIMA CD4 might be an alternative for sites without access to standard CD4 count methodology
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , HIV Infections , Pilot Projects , Flow Cytometry/methods , CD4 Lymphocyte CountABSTRACT
Trans women are at high risk of HIV infection. We conducted a review to determine the extent to which trans women were eligible for inclusion in and enrolled into pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) efficacy trials. Out of seven trials analyzing PrEP efficacy, we found that trans women comprised only 1.2% of one trial and 0.2% of total trial enrollments. Although an additional PrEP trial to determine efficacy among trans women may not be warranted, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of PrEP in this marginalized population, through observational and feasibility studies. These studies should focus on unique barriers that trans women may experience while obtaining access to PrEP, such as gender discrimination, transphobia, and violence.
