ABSTRACT
Background: Although cancer patients' activities of daily living (ADL) are reported to decline before death, ADL trajectories have not been sufficiently clarified due to limitations in the assessment and analysis methods. Objectives: To clarify the multiple trajectories of ADL in patients with terminal cancer using a comprehensive assessment measure. Design: This was a retrospective observational study. Setting/Study Subjects: Cancer patients aged ≥18 years discharged at death from a single-center palliative care unit. Measurements: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total scores for eight weeks retrospectively. Results: In total, 306 patients were analyzed. Group-based trajectory modeling analysis estimated four groups as the best model for the FIM trajectory over eight weeks using the following trajectories: (1) a No Decline group, in which ADL did not decline until just before death; (2) a Rapid Decline group, in which ADL declined rapidly two weeks before death from a trajectory similar to the No Decline group; (3) a Moderate Disability and Slow Decline group, in which the patient slowly declined from requiring mild-to-severe assistance; and (4) a Severe Disability group, in which the patient continuously required severe assistance. Conclusions: Multiple ADL trajectories were identified in the last eight weeks of life of patients with terminal cancer. These findings suggest that palliative care needs to be tailored to the characteristics of each patient.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no information on whether vulnerable older patients with cancer consider basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) important outcomes. Our survey aimed to investigate the priority of BADL and IADL in outcomes among vulnerable older patients with cancer. METHODS: This was a single-center survey in a Japanese cancer center. Eligible patients were ≥ 65 years of age and were prescribed in-hospital rehabilitation while under cancer treatment. Using original self-administered ranking questionnaires, patients were asked to rank outcomes and subdomain of BADL and IADL. High-priority domains were defined as the highest, second-highest, and third-highest priority domains in individuals. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 74.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years) and the number of males was 107 (63%). The order of ranking of high-priority outcomes was BADL and IADL (n = 155), cognitive function (n = 91), mental function (n = 82), nutrition (n = 61), social function (n = 51), comorbidity (n = 39), and life span (n = 28). The top three high-priority independence subdomains of BADL and IADL were toilet use (n = 140), feeding (n = 134), and mobility (n = 69) among the BADL and shopping (n = 93), food preparation (n = 88), and ability to handle finances (n = 85) among the IADL. CONCLUSIONS: BADL and IADL can be considered the most important health outcomes in clinical trials and in practice among older patients with cancer and physical vulnerabilities.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Comorbidity , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the effect of outpatient-based complex decongestive therapy in patients with secondary lower limb lymphedema (LLL) after gynecologic cancer surgery using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM), and to examine factors predictive of the treatment course. METHODS: This retrospective study included participants who underwent surgery for gynecological cancer with pelvic lymph node dissection and subsequently visited the outpatient clinic for the treatment of stage II LLL according to the International Society of Lymphology. The improvement rate of edema at the initial visit and 3, 6, and 12 months later was assessed by calculating the volume of the lower extremity using the circumferential method. For evaluation of the patterns of treatment course, logistic regression analysis was performed after group estimation by the trend of the treatment course using GBTM. RESULTS: A total of 148 women (mean age 60.6 years (standard deviation: 13.4 years)) were analyzed. Three improvement trajectories were identified: (1) no response group, with worsening rather than improvement (n = 26); (2) moderate response group, with a slow improvement rate (n = 89); and (3) high response group, with a high improvement rate (n = 33). In addition, adherence to compression therapy at 3 months post-intervention was found to be a predictor in the no response group. CONCLUSIONS: GBTM estimated that there are three patterns of the treatment course in patients with LLL after gynecologic cancer surgery. Adherence to compression therapy at 3 months post-intervention is a predictor of the treatment effectiveness.
