Survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe. Part 2: Progressive MS, paediatric MS, pregnancy and general management.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The European Charcot Foundation supported the development of a set of surveys to understand current practice patterns for the diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe. Part 2 of the report summarizes survey results related to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), pregnancy, paediatric MS and overall patient management. METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists developed case- and practice-based questions for two sequential surveys distributed to MS neurologists throughout Europe. RESULTS: Respondents generally favoured changing rather than stopping disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in patients transitioning from relapsing-remitting MS to SPMS, particularly with active disease. Respondents would not initiate DMT in patients with typical PPMS symptoms, although the presence of ≥1 spinal cord or brain gadolinium-enhancing lesion might affect that decision. For patients considering pregnancy, respondents were equally divided on whether to stop treatment before or after conception. Respondents strongly favoured starting DMT in paediatric MS with active disease; recommended treatments included interferon, glatiramer acetate and, in John Cunningham virus negative patients, natalizumab. Additional results regarding practice-based questions and management are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Results of part 2 of the survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for MS in Europe largely mirror results for part 1, with neurologists in general agreement about the treatment and management of SPMS, PPMS, pregnancy and paediatric MS as well as the general management of MS. However, there are also many areas of disagreement, indicating the need for evidence-based recommendations and/or guidelines.

Survey of diagnostic and treatment practices for multiple sclerosis in Europe.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Up-to-date information is needed on the extent to which neurologists treating multiple sclerosis (MS) in Europe are integrating rapidly evolving diagnostic criteria, disease-modifying therapies and recommendations for monitoring disease activity into their clinical practice. METHODS: A steering committee of MS neurologists used a modified Delphi process to develop case- and practice-based questions for two sequential surveys distributed to MS neurologists throughout Europe. Case-based questions were developed for radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and RRMS with breakthrough disease. RESULTS: Multiple sclerosis neurologists from 11 European countries responded to survey 1 (n = 233) and survey 2 (n = 171). Respondents agreed that they would not treat the patients in the RIS or CIS cases but would treat a patient with a relatively mild form of RRMS. Choice of treatment was evenly distributed among first-line injectables and oral treatments for mild RRMS, and moved to second-line treatment as the RRMS case increased in severity. Additional results on RRMS with breakthrough disease are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was general agreement on some aspects of treatment, responses to other management and clinical practice questions varied considerably. These results, which reflect current clinical practice patterns, highlight the need for additional MS treatment education and awareness and may help inform the development of MS practice guidelines in Europe.

Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data.

Authors' right to access to all data obtained in their study

Characteristics of patients with short and long survivals after detection of intracranial metastases from breast cancer.

The clinical course of 106 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer was retrospectively studied. Median time of survival after detection of intracranial metastases (SAR(ICM] was 14 weeks (95% confidence limits: 10-19 weeks), and 25% of the patients survived for more than 37 weeks, while only 17% survived for one year. The occurrence of clinical, pathoanatomical and therapeutical variables in these patients were analyzed in a subgroup of 57 patients, who survived for less than 16 weeks, and compared with a subgroup of 49 patients, who survived for more than 16 weeks after detection brain metastases. None of the variables studied were associated with either of the two prognostic groups. Patients with short SAR(ICM) had, however, a greater number of extra-cranial metastases at recurrence in the brain compared to patients with SAR(ICM) more than 16 weeks (p = 0.07). Patients with SAR(ICM) less than 16 weeks had a somewhat shorter recurrence-free interval (p = 0.22) and a significantly shorter time from primary diagnosis until detection of brain metastases (p = 0.04). Probably as a consequence of this, these patients had a shorter survival from primary diagnosis as well as from first recurrence. The findings may indicate that the differences in survival of patients with brain metastases are mainly due to differences in the rate of disease progression.