Under the Weather: The Meteorological Effect on Orthopaedic Trauma in Hertfordshire.

Background Effective and efficient use of operating theatres is essential to the smooth running of a trauma service. The paper aims to understand the effect of meteorological factors on the number of referrals and volume and nature of trauma operating cases within our local area. Methods Trauma data over two seasons were analysed in our database, a digital clinical platform that coordinates all admissions and trauma theatre activity. Data consisted of the number of referrals per day, patient age, mechanism of injury, and type of orthopaedic injury. Weather data were gathered from 'Weather Underground', https://www.wunderground.com/history, which records daily weather observations, located 12 miles away from our trauma unit. Results During the study period's last two seasons, 1160 consultations were analysed and 779 required operative intervention. The neck of femur fractures and ankle trauma were the two most common causes of trauma, accounting for 27% and 15%, respectively. The neck of femur fracture pathologies were not significantly correlated with any meteorological factor studied. On the contrary, ankle trauma was the only injury significantly correlating with temperature (p < 0.03) and dew point (p < 0.04). The most common mechanism of trauma was a ground-level fall (n = 590) whilst the least common was a motor vehicle accident (n = 39). Analysing the effect of weather and its effect on the age group of presentation, temperature (p < 0.01), sunlight (p < 0.002), and dew point (p < 0.03) were all significantly correlated with trauma in patients aged younger than 21 years of age. Conclusion The weather has no effect on the neck of femur fractures, the most common trauma pathology treated in our department. In all seasons, allocated specific trauma lists for the latter should be arranged irrelevant of the weather conditions. A strong correlation was identified between ankle trauma and weather. We identified that Tuesdays and Fridays received the highest referral rate and peaked between the months of October-November. These data lay the groundwork for local clinical directors to shape the future on-call trauma service.

Analysis of Our Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults: Are We Over Operating?

Background Fractures of the distal radius are a common injury. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and The British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have released new guidelines outlining the management of these fractures, specifically identifying "thresholds for intervention," based on radiological parameters for management with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Questions/Purposes Have our distal radius fractures (DRFs), previously managed with ORIF, met the new guidelines' thresholds for intervention, based on radiological parameters? Patients and Methods A retrospective assessment of DRFs treated with ORIF was performed between January 2017 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on their age. The five radiological parameters of ulnar variance, dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height, and intra-articular step were measured on the initial plain radiograph, "pre-manipulation film," postplaster application radiograph, and "post-manipulation film." These were compared with the "thresholds for intervention" outlined in the BOA/BSSH guidelines. Results A total of 94 patients underwent an ORIF with a mean age of 56 years (range 17-86 years). As many as 75.74% of patients on the "pre-manipulation film" met the "threshold for intervention" on at least one radiological parameter, while 53.57% of patients on the "post-manipulation" met at least one "threshold for intervention." Dorsal tilt was the parameter that most often met the threshold in both films at 53.37% and 40.11%, respectively. Conclusion Within our trust, there is a tendency to over manage the distal radius fracture with ORIF, potentially resulting in unnecessary operations. Education surrounding the new guidelines will better serve our decision-making. Level of Evidence This is a level III study.

Near-fatal Periprosthetic Infection with Streptobacillus moniliformis: Case and Review.

Case presentation of a 66 year old female with penicillin hypersensitivity, who suffered late acute periprosthetic infection of her total knee replacement. After emergency surgery and admission to intensive care, the responsible organism was later identified as Streptobacillus moniliformis. This serves as the first documented case of Streptobacillus moniliformis prosthetic joint infection. As standard culture mediums provide an exceedingly low detection rate, 16S PCR should instead be used as the first line method of identification. As a result, its detection is largely dependent on clinicians recognising relevant factors within the patient's history, namely close contact with rodents. In a patient with penicillin hypersensitivity, carbapenems have demonstrated potential as an effective treatment strategy.

Is there a difference between the ability to kneel after unilateral and bilateral total knee replacement?

This study investigates the difference between the ability to kneel in patients after unilateral and bilateral total knee replacement. We used the Oxford knee questionnaire to assess knee function, and an additional question was introduced to identify the reasons for any difficulty or inability to kneel. Responses were received from 424 patients representing an 88.9% response rate. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.01) difference in kneeling ability between the two groups. With bilateral total knee replacement, 73% of patients found it extremely difficult or impossible to kneel, compared to 62% of patients with unilateral total knee replacement. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in their overall Oxford knee function score or in their responses on reasons for difficulty or inability to kneel.