Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the patterns of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff opacification with four-channel multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in a cohort of patients with disease warranting imaging of the lower extremity arterial system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial occlusive or aneurysmal disease underwent imaging with four-channel multi-detector row CT from the supraceliac abdominal aorta through the feet. Transverse sections were acquired with a 2.5-mm nominal detector width and pitch of 6.0 (3.2-mm effective section thickness) following intravenous injection of 174-185 mL of iodinated contrast medium (300 mg iodine per milliliter). In each patient, attenuation measurements were recorded in 16 arterial and 16 venous locations. In 18 patients, two radiologists assessed the detectability and stenosis degree of 21 arterial segments per patient relative to these features at conventional angiography. RESULTS: A mean scanning time of 66 seconds was required to cover a mean of 1,233 mm, resulting in a mean of 908 transverse reconstructions. All 504 arterial segments were depicted and analyzable. Mean arterial attenuation ranged from 253 HU in the midabdominal aorta to 357 HU in the popliteal artery and 253 HU in the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery measured inferior to the tibiotalar joint. Maximum mean venous enhancement (99 HU) was observed in the saphenous vein at the ankle, with all other venous stations measuring less than 74 HU. CONCLUSION: The arteries of lower extremity inflow and runoff can be reliably depicted with minimal venous enhancement by using multi-detector row CT.

Iliac arterial injuries after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with iliac curvature and diameter.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between iliac arterial tortuosity and cross-sectional area and the occurrence of iliac arterial injuries following transfemoral delivery of endovascular prostheses for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Iliac arterial curvature values and orthogonal cross-sectional areas were determined from helical computed tomographic (CT) data acquired in 42 patients prior to transfemoral delivery of aortic stent-grafts. The curvature and luminal cross-sectional area orthogonal to the median centerline were quantified every millimeter along the median centerline of the iliac arteries. An indicator of global iliac tortuosity, the iliac tortuosity index, was defined as the sum of the curvature values for all points with a curvature of 0.3 cm(-1) or greater, and cross-sectional area (CSA) was indexed for all points as the mean cross-sectional diameter (D = 2 radical[CSA/pi]). Following stent-graft deployment, helical CT data were analyzed for the presence of iliac arterial dissections independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: Eighteen dissections were detected in 16 patients. The iliac tortuosity index was significantly larger in iliac arteries with dissections (35.5 +/- 20.8 [mean +/- SD]) when compared with both nondissected contralateral iliac arteries in the same patients (26.1 +/- 21.0, P =.001) and iliac arteries in patients without any iliac arterial injury (20 +/- 9, P =.009). The tortuosity index was higher ipsilateral to the primary component delivery in 10 of 11 iliac dissections that developed along the primary component delivery route. CONCLUSION: A high degree of iliac arterial tortuosity appears to impart greater risk for the development of iliac arterial injuries in patients undergoing transfemoral delivery of endovascular devices.

Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare single- versus four-channel helical computed tomographic (CT) aortography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with aortic aneurysm or dissection underwent four- and one-channel CT angiography. Scan pairs covered the thoracic inlet to the diaphragm (n = 10) and supraceliac abdominal aorta (n = 19) or thoracic inlet (n = 19) to the femoral arterial bifurcations. For four-channel CT, nominal section thickness and pitch were 2.5 mm and 6.0, respectively, and for one-channel CT, 3.0 mm and 2.0 to the infrarenal aorta and 5.0 mm and 2.0 to the femoral arteries. Effective section thickness, scanning duration, scanning coverage, dose of iodinated contrast material, and mean aortoiliac attenuation were compared. Data were summarized as speed (coverage/duration), scanning efficiency (speed/section thickness), and contrast efficiency (mean aortic attenuation/dose of contrast material). RESULTS: At four- versus one-channel CT, CT angiography was 2.6 times faster, scanning efficiency was 4.1 times greater, contrast efficiency was 2.5 times greater, dose of contrast material was reduced (mean, 57%; 97 vs 232 mL) without a significant change in aortic enhancement, and sections were thinner (mean, 40%; 3.2 vs 5.3 mm) despite a 59% shorter scanning duration (22 vs 56 seconds). CONCLUSION: Substantially reduced doses of contrast medium, shorter scanning durations, and narrower effective sections result with four- versus one-channel CT aortography. No advantages of one-channel CT aortography were demonstrated.