Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med Sci ; 362(5): 453-461, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34033809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used and implicated in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated the relation between chronic PPI use in veterans with CKD G3a to G4 and the rate of decline in renal function. METHODS: We accessed the Veteran Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure national database to evaluate the relation between chronic PPI use and rate of decline in renal function in veterans with CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min1.73 m2). We applied Propensity Score Matching to match the PPI group and the no-PPI control group on age, sex, race, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The final sample included 1406 patients (age: 62.07±7.82, 62.02% Caucasian) in the PPI cohort with a median 4.7 years follow-up and 1425 patients (age: 65.45±6.58, 71.16% Caucasian) in the control cohort with a median 3.9 years follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression were performed to analyze the associations of PPI use with dialysis, all-cause mortality, metabolic acidosis, and CKD progression. RESULTS: The PPI group had a significantly increased risk of CKD progression, dialysis and all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.19; aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.67; and aHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.65, respectively). The PPI cohort also had a trend for development of metabolic acidosis (aHR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.998 to 1.80), although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that chronic PPI use accelerates progression of kidney disease and is associated with increased mortality in CKD patients.


Subject(s)
Kidney , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Acidosis , Disease Progression , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/physiopathology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Risk Factors
2.
Respir Med ; 120: 1-9, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817804

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The predictive characteristics of different screening surveys for the recognition of individuals at risk for airflow obstruction (AFO) have not been evaluated simultaneously in the same population. PURPOSE: To compare five AFO/COPD screening questionnaires. METHODS: 383 individuals completed the Veterans Airflow Obstruction Screening Questionnaire, Personal Level Screener for COPD (VAFOSQ), the 11-Q COPD Screening Questionnaire (11-Q), the COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS) and the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ) and performed spirometry. AFO was defined as forced expiratory volume in one second divided by the forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) < 0.7, fixed ratio (FR) or FEV1/FVC < lower limit of normal (LLN). The predictive characteristics of the five questionnaires were calculated and non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves estimated by logistic regression. RESULTS: 376 participants completed at least two of the questionnaires and performed technically acceptable spirometry. AFO was present in 102 (27.1%) and 150 (39.9%) based on LLN and FR, respectively. The number of individuals positively selected by the VAFOSQ was 227, PLS 128, 11-Q 236, COPD-PS 217, and LFQ 328. The area under the ROC curves for the questionnaires was between 0.60 and 0.66 (LLN) and 0.58 and 0.66 (FR). CONCLUSIONS: Although these screening surveys have acceptable and similar predictive ability for the identification of AFO, their published thresholds lead to substantially different classification rates. The choice of an appropriate threshold for the identification of individuals with possible AFO/COPD should consider the underlying prevalence of AFO/COPD in the target population and the relative costs of misclassifying affected and unaffected cases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: None. PRIMARY SOURCE OF FUNDING: Veterans Health Administration.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Risk Factors , Spirometry/methods , Veterans , Veterans Health , Vital Capacity
3.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 3(4): 705-715, 2016 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28848897

ABSTRACT

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) and is frequently under-diagnosed. We developed the Veterans Airflow Screening Questionnaire (VAFOSQ) to improve the identification of Veterans with airflow obstruction (AFO), the most commonly used criterion for the diagnosis of COPD.We created an initial survey with 78 variables that have been associated with AFO. A total of 825 patients in 3 primary care clinics performed spirometry after bronchodilator administration and completed the initial survey. Best sets regression was used to build a model that predicted AFO optimally. A total of 195 of 825 (23.3%) patients had AFO and 7 items positively predicted AFO. When the questionnaire score was greater than 25, the VAFOSQ accurately identified AFO with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.72. In a prospective validation cohort of 376 participants, the positive predictive value was 32% and negative predictive value 81%. The VAFOSQ is a reliable and valid instrument for the identification of veterans at risk for AFO who would benefit from further evaluation with spirometry and assessment for COPD. The VAFOSQ is straightforward to use and can be easily self-administered and self-scored enabling widespread application within the VHA.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...