Linezolid and fentanyl: An underrecognized drug-to-drug interaction.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Despite its frequent use in clinical practice, fentanyl's pro-serotonergic effects are underrecognized, especially in combination with linezolid. Life-threatening reactions can occur. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of serotonin syndrome developed shortly after the initiation of linezolid in a 63-year-old patient in whom selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy was discontinued for the duration of antibiotic therapy. However, fentanyl transdermal patch treatment was inadvertently continued. Noteworthy, 24 hours following discontinuation of linezolid, the patient experienced complete resolution of symptoms. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Fentanyl can increase the intrasynaptic release of serotonin through their effects on y-amino butyric acid and its phenylpiperidine chemical structure. We illustrate the importance of thorough medication reconciliation and review of all potential drug-to-drug interactions when indicating linezolid therapy to ensure patient safety. We believe that our case provides novel observations and insight that could help recognize similar cases in clinical practice.

Outcomes and Complications of Lead Removal: Can We Establish a Risk Stratification Schema for a Collaborative and Effective Approach?

BACKGROUND: Removal of an entire cardiovascular implantable electronic device is associated with morbidity and mortality. We sought to establish a risk classification scheme according to the outcomes of transvenous lead removal in a single center, with the goal of using that scheme to guide electrophysiology lab versus operating room extraction. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead removal from January 2001 to October 2012 at Mayo Clinic were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1,378 leads were removed from 652 (age 64 ± 17 years, M 68%) patients undergoing 702 procedures. Mean (standard deviation) lead age was 57.6 (58.8) months. Forty-four percent of leads required laser-assisted extraction. Lead duration (P < 0.001) and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead (P < 0.001) were associated with the need for laser extraction and procedure failure (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02). The major complication rate was 1.9% and was significantly associated with longer lead duration (odds ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.3; P < 0.001). High-risk patients (with a >10-year-old pacing or a >5-year-old ICD lead) had significantly higher major events than moderate-risk (with pacing lead 1-10 years old or ICD lead 1-5 years old) and low-risk (any lead ≤1-year-old) patients (5.3%, 1.2%, and 0%, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous lead removal is highly successful, with few serious procedural complications. We propose a risk stratification scheme that may categorize patients as low, moderate, and high risk for lead extraction. Such a strategy may guide which extractions are best performed in the operating room.