Effect of maxillary impaction on mandibular surgical accuracy in virtually-planned orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.

Although surgical accuracy has been evaluated in bi-maxillary procedures, few studies have investigated the relationship between maxillary and mandibular accuracy. The present study evaluated the effect of maxillary impaction accuracy on mandibular surgical outcome. This cohort study analyzed skeletal class III patients who underwent planned maxillary impaction in bi-maxillary surgery. The primary predictor was the difference between the virtual plan and surgical outcome in the maxilla, as determined by three-dimensional (3D) and vertical differences. The secondary predictors were the planned 3D distances in the maxilla and mandible. The primary outcome was mandibular surgical accuracy, defined as the difference between the planned and actual outcomes, calculated as 3D Euclidean distance. The study included 73 patients. Increased differences between the planned and actual outcomes in the maxilla were associated with increased differences in the mandible. The post-operative position of the mandible was closer to the planned position when the position of the impacted maxilla was superior than when it was inferior to the planned position. Moving the maxilla closer to the planned position resulted in a more accurate mandibular position. These findings suggest that careful surgical procedures are needed to avoid inferior positioning of the maxilla during maxillary impaction surgery.

Evaluation of postoperative changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using balanced orthognathic surgery system.

BACKGROUND: Many studies on maintaining the condyle in a normal or anatomical position during orthognathic surgery have been conducted to stabilize surgical outcomes and prevent iatrogenic temporomandibular joint complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the balanced orthognathic surgery (BOS) system. METHODS: Postoperative changes in condylar position were retrospectively evaluated in 22 condyles of 11 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system. The center point coordinates of the condylar head before and after orthognathic surgery were analyzed using voxel-based registration. RESULTS: Changes in the condylar position mainly occurred downward in the y-axis (-1.09 ± 0.62 mm) (P < 0.05). The change in the x-axis (0.02 ± 0.68 mm) and z-axis (0.01 ± 0.48 mm) showed no significant difference between before and after orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the changes in the condylar positions after orthognathic surgery using virtual surgical planning via the BOS system mainly occurred downward in the y-axis, with slight changes in the x- and z-axes. The change in the condylar position after orthognathic surgery using the BOS system is clinically acceptable.

Virtually-Planned Orthognathic Surgery Achieves an Accurate Condylar Position.

PURPOSE: Accuracy in orthognathic surgery with virtual planning has been reported, but detailed analysis of accuracy according to anatomic location, including the mandibular condyle, is insufficient. The purpose of this study was to compare the virtual plan and surgical outcomes and analyze the degree and distribution of errors according to each anatomic location. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated skeletal class III patients, treated with bimaxillary surgery. The primary predictor was anatomic locations that consisted of right and left condyles, maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. Other variables were age and gender. The primary outcome was surgical accuracy, defined as mean 3-dimensional distance error, mean absolute error, and mean error along the horizontal, vertical, and anteroposterior axes between the virtual plan and surgical outcomes. Landmarks were compared using a computational method based on affine transformation with a 1-time landmark setting. The mean errors were visualized with multidimensional scattergrams. Bivariate and regression statistics were computed. RESULTS: This study included 52 patients, 26 men and 26 women, with a mean age of 21 years and 3 months. The mean 3D distance errors for condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were 1.03, 1.25, and 2.24 mm, respectively. Condylar landmarks, maxillary landmarks, and the landmarks on the distal segment of the mandible were positioned at 0.49 mm inferior, 0.28 mm anterior, and 1.25 mm inferior, respectively. The landmark errors for the distal segment of the mandible exhibited a wider distribution than those for condylar and maxillary landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the planned and actual outcome aided by virtual surgical planning was highest for the condyles, followed by the maxilla, and the distal segment of the mandible. It is important to consider the tendency for surgical errors in each anatomic location during operations.

A novel method for the management of proximal segment using computer assisted simulation surgery: correct condyle head positioning and better proximal segment placement.

Computer Assisted Simulation Surgery (CASS) is a reliable method that permits oral and maxillofacial surgeons to visualize the position of the maxilla and the mandible as observed in the patient. The purpose of this report was to introduce a newly developed strategy for proximal segment management according to Balanced Orthognathic Surgery (BOS) protocol which is a type of CASS, and to establish the clinical feasibility of the BOS protocol in the treatment of complex maxillo-facial deformities. The BOS protocol consists of the following 4 phases: 1) Planning and simulation phase, 2) Modeling phase, 3) Surgical phase, and 4) Evaluation phase. The surgical interventions in 80 consecutive patients were planned and executed by the BOS protocol. The BOS protocol ensures accuracy during surgery, thereby facilitating the completion of procedures without any complications. The BOS protocol may be a complete solution that enables an orthognatic surgeon to perform accurate surgery based on a surgical plan, making real outcomes as close to pre-planned outcomes as possible.