Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Contraception ; 111: 61-70, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526598

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review the literature on health workers' values and preferences related to contraceptive methods. STUDY DESIGN: As part of a larger review, we searched ten electronic databases for published articles from January 1, 2005 through July 27, 2020. We included studies that reported qualitative or quantitative data from the perspective of health workers providing family planning services globally. RESULTS: Forty-one studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies included 12,643 health workers and were conducted in 27 countries. Health worker values and preferences for contraceptive methods were affected by factors related to contraceptive method characteristics (e.g., bleeding pattern and convenience), the contraceptive user (e.g., medical history, parity), and the health worker themselves (e.g., training, environment). Differences were also noted between various professions/specialties (e.g., comfort level with contraceptive methods, depth of experience). While contraceptive counseling and provision were influenced by health worker values and preferences, they were also affected by health worker misconceptions and biases. CONCLUSION: Health worker values and preferences for contraception are affected by the client's history, medical eligibility, and the health worker context. Provision of contraception that is affected by harmful bias towards certain populations or about certain methods can negatively affect patient-centered care. Future work should address knowledge gaps and health worker biases by improving and standardizing education and training globally, to ensure high-quality, rights-based, and patient-centered contraceptive services.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Family Planning Services , Contraception/methods , Contraceptive Agents , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Patient-Centered Care , Pregnancy
2.
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf ; 80(11): 276-282, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34765987

ABSTRACT

Reducing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission relies on people quarantining after exposure to COVID-19 or if they experience COVID-19 symptoms, and isolating from others if COVID-19 positive. Quarantine and isolation last 10 to 14 days and can be state-mandated; however, the level of compliance is unknown. The University of Hawai'i Department of Family Medicine clinic called patients instructed by our physicians to quarantine for exposure risk or symptoms of potential COVID-19 infection between March 15, 2020, and April 15, 2020. None of the patients tested positive for COVID-19. Sixty-nine of 90 (77%) patients completed follow-up calls and self-reported whether they had stayed home. Of these 69 patients, 32 (46%) broke quarantine to buy groceries (36%), work (9%), visit others (6%), or for other reasons (12%). For patients living alone, 8 of 11 (73%) left home to buy groceries. For employed patients, 6 of 39 (15%) returned to work during their quarantine period. Nearly half of our patients did not quarantine for the entire period. Many persons left home to buy food or to work. Strong public health messaging is needed to educate communities about the requirement to quarantine. Clinicians can help by asking patients about social and financial ability to quarantine, schedule follow-up appointments to remind patients to stay home, and link patients to food programs, financial assistance, and other community resources to successfully quarantine and prevent COVID-19 transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , Humans , Patient Compliance , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf ; 79(6 Suppl 2): 70-77, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596682

ABSTRACT

The number of foreign-born people living in the United States continues to increase yearly. Foreign-born women in the United States, a group that includes both refugees and immigrants, continue to have higher birth rates when compared to their US-born counterparts. This study examines the cultural and socioeconomic factors influencing family planning choices of resettled refugee women living in the United States. Thirty-two Bhutanese, Burmese, and Iraqi women living in Philadelphia participated in interviews and focus groups. A grounded theory approach was used for analysis. Three overarching themes were identified: knowledge acquisition and experiential learning with trans-border migration and resettlement, changes in gender roles and family relations, and provider relationships and provision of care. Findings from the study show that a stable environment results in increased opportunities and personal freedoms, a sense of empowerment, and the desire for family planning. Women want to discuss options, but healthcare providers must begin the conversation. As health care providers in Hawai'i, a state with about 18% of residents being foreign-born, what can be learned from the Philadelphia refugee experience and family planning?


Subject(s)
Refugees/psychology , Adult , Asian People/ethnology , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Bhutan/ethnology , Family Planning Services , Female , Focus Groups/methods , Grounded Theory , Humans , Iraq/ethnology , Myanmar/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania , Qualitative Research , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...