Impact of and Response to Cyberattacks in Radiation Oncology.

Cyberattacks on health care facilities are increasing and significantly affecting health care delivery throughout the world. The recent cyberattack on our hospital-based radiation facility exposed vulnerabilities of radiation oncology systems and highlighted the dependence of radiation treatment on integrated and complex radiation planning, delivery and verification systems. After the cyberattack on our health care facility, radiation oncology staff reconstructed patient information, schedules, and radiation plans from existing paper records and physicians developed a system to triage patients requiring immediate transfer of radiation treatment to nearby facilities. Medical physics and hospital information technology collaborated to restore services without access to the system backup or network connectivity. Ultimately, radiation treatments resumed incrementally as systems were restored and rebuilt. The experiences and lessons learned from this response were reviewed. The successes and shortcomings were incorporated into recommendations to provide guidance to other radiation facilities in preparation for a possible cyberattack. Our response and recommendations are intended to serve as a starting point to assist other facilities in cybersecurity preparedness planning. Because there is no one-size-fits-all response, each department should determine its specific vulnerabilities, risks, and available resources to create an individualized plan.

Using the ACR CT accreditation phantom for routine image quality assurance on both CT and CBCT imaging systems in a radiotherapy environment.

Image-guided radiation therapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is becoming routine practice in modern radiation therapy. The purpose of this work was to develop an imaging QA program for CT and CBCT units in our department, based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom. The phantom has four testing modules, permitting one to test CT number accuracy, slice width, low contrast resolution, image uniformity, in-plane distance accuracy, and high-contrast resolution reproducibly with suggested window/levels for image analysis. Additional tests for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and noise were added using the polyethylene and acrylic plugs. Baseline values were obtained from CT simulator images acquired on a Phillips Brilliance Big Bore CT simulator and CBCT images acquired on three Varian CBCTs for the imaging protocols most used clinically. Images were then acquired quarterly over a period of two years. Images were exported via DICOM and analyzed manually using OsiriX. Baseline values were used to ensure that image quality remained consistent quarterly, and baselines were reset at any major maintenance or recalibration. Analysis of CT simulator images showed that image quality was within ACR guidelines for all tested scanning protocols. All three CBCT systems were unable to distinguish the low-contrast resolution plugs and had the same high-contrast resolution over all imaging protocols. Analysis of CBCT results over time determined a range of values that could be used to establish quantitative tolerance levels for image quality deterioration. While appropriate for the helical CT, the ACR phantom and guidelines could be modified to be more useful in evaluating CBCT systems. In addition, the observed values for the CT simulator were well within ACR tolerances.

Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare left-sided whole breast conventional and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans were created for 10 consecutive patients. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), and inverse-planned IMRT (inv-IMRT) used two tangent beams. For-IMRT utilized up to four segments per beam. For helical tomotherapy (HT) plans, beamlet entrance and/or exit to critical structures was blocked. Topotherapy plans, which used static gantry angles with simultaneous couch translation and inverse-planned intensity modulation, used two tangent beams. Plans were normalized to 50Gy to 95% of the retracted PTV. RESULTS: Target max doses were reduced with for-IMRT compared to 3DCRT, which were further reduced with HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT. HT resulted in lowest heart and ipsilateral lung max doses, but had higher mean doses. Inv-IMRT and topotherapy reduced ipsilateral lung mean and max doses compared to 3DCRT and for-IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: All modalities evaluated provide adequate coverage of the intact breast. HT, topotherapy, and inv-IMRT can reduce high doses to the target and normal tissues, although HT results in increased low doses to large volume of normal tissue. For-IMRT improves target homogeneity compared with 3DCRT, but to a lesser degree than the inverse-planned modalities.

A technique for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning with helical tomotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient and effective planning technique for stereotactic radiosurgery using helical tomotherapy. Planning CTs and contours of 20 patients, previously treated in our clinic for brain metastases with linac-based radiosurgery using circular collimators, were used to develop a robust TomoTherapy planning technique. Plan calculation times as well as delivery times were recorded for all patients to allow for an efficiency evaluation. In addition, conformation and homogeneity indices were calculated as metrics to compare plan quality with that which is achieved with conventional radiosurgery delivery systems. A robust and efficient planning technique was identified to produce plans of radiosurgical quality using the TomoTherapy treatment planning system. Dose calculation did not exceed a few hours and resulting delivery times were less than 1 hour, which allows the process to fit into a single day radiosurgery workflow. Plan conformity compared favorably with published results for gamma knife radiosurgery. In addition, plan homogeneity was similar to linac-based approaches. The TomoTherapy planning software can be used to create plans of acceptable quality for stereotactic radiosurgery in a time that is appropriate for a radiosurgery workflow that requires that planning and delivery occur within 1 treatment day.

A comparison of helical tomotherapy to circular collimator-based linear-accelerator radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To compare stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans for the treatment of patients with brain metastases generated using Tomotherapy and a circular collimator-based SRS approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, previously treated with circular collimator-based radiosurgery, were replanned using Tomotherapy treatment planning software. Tomotherapy planning emphasized dose fall off peripheral to the target by allowing for inhomogeneous target coverage. Conformity and dose falloff were compared with the circular collimator-based plans using the following metrics: prescription isodose to tumor volume ratio, conformation number, and homogeneity index to assess effects on targets, whereas a combined conformity gradient index and the volume of the 12-Gy isodose volume were used to assess differences in dose to normal brain. RESULTS: Although a similar homogeneity index was achieved for both sets of plans, plan conformity was generally improved using the tomotherapy system whereas dose falloff at the target periphery was shallower. The 12-Gy isodose volume increased on average by 3.4 mL (range, -1.9 to +12.1 mL), for the 20 patients studied, but in spite of this, based on modeled predictions, the risk for symptomatic radiation necrosis associated with Tomotherapy SRS for each patient still falls within the clinically observed ranges for Gamma Knife SRS. CONCLUSION: Tomotherapy can be used to create treatment plans that meet the dosimetric and clinical requirements for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system for radiosurgery treatment with helical tomotherapy.

The aim of this work was to determine the accuracy and precision of stereotactic localization and treatment delivery using a helical tomotherapy based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. A tomotherapy specific radiosurgery workflow was designed that exploits the system's on board megavotage CT (MVCT) imaging system so that it not only provides a pre-treatment volumetric verification image that can be used for stereotactic localization, eliminating the need for a patient-frame based coordinate system, but also supplies the treatment planning image. Using an imaging guidance based intracranial stereotactic positioning system, a head ring and tabletop docking device are used only for fixation, while image guidance is used for localization. Due to the unconventional workflow, a methodology for determining the localization accuracy was developed and results were compared to other linear accelerator based radiosurgery systems. In this work, the localization error using volumetric localization was found to be 0.45 mm +/- 0.17 mm, indicating a localization precision of 0.3 mm within a 95% confidence interval. In addition, procedures for testing the delivery accuracy of the Tomotherapy system are described. Results show that the accuracy of the delivery can be verified to within +/-1 voxel dimension. These results are well within conventional SRS tolerances and compare favorably to other linear accelerator based techniques.

A comprehensive assessment by tumor site of patient setup using daily MVCT imaging from more than 3,800 helical tomotherapy treatments.

PURPOSE: To assess patient setup corrections based on daily megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for four anatomic treatment sites treated on tomotherapy. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Translational and rotational setup corrections, based on registration of daily MVCT to planning CT images, were analyzed for 1,179 brain and head and neck (H&N), 1,414 lung, and 1,274 prostate treatment fractions. Frequencies of three-dimensional vector lengths, overall distributions of setup corrections, and patient-specific distributions of random and systematic setup errors were analyzed. RESULTS: Brain and H&N had lower magnitude positioning corrections and smaller variations in translational setup errors but were comparable in roll rotations. Three-dimensional vector translational shifts of larger magnitudes occurred more frequently for lung and prostate than for brain and H&N treatments, yet this was not observed for roll rotations. The global systematic error for prostate was 4.7 mm in the vertical direction, most likely due to couch sag caused by large couch extension distances. Variations in systematic errors and magnitudes of random translational errors ranged from 1.6 to 2.6 mm for brain and H&N and 3.2 to 7.2 mm for lung and prostate, whereas roll rotational errors ranged from 0.8 degrees to 1.2 degrees for brain and H&N and 0.5 degrees to 1.0 degrees for lung and prostate. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in setup were observed between brain, H&N, lung, and prostate treatments. Patient setup can be improved if daily imaging is performed. This analysis can assess the utilization of daily image guidance and allows for further investigation into improved anatomic site-specific and patient-specific treatments.

Quality assurance of an image guided intracranial stereotactic positioning system.

This work reports on the development and testing of an intracranial stereotactic patient positioning system (ISPPS) for Tomotherapy. The ISPPS consists of the combination of a head frame, head frame couch interface (HCI), megavoltage CT (MVCT), and optical tracking camera system. Three quality assurance tests were designed to quantify the positioning system's ability to localize an intracranial target. The first two of these tests were designed to determine (a) the ability of the MVCT to detect a known shift applied to an anthropomorphic phantom and (b) the precision of fixing the phantom to the treatment couch via a head frame and specially designed head frame couch interface. A system verification test, using a phantom and EDR2 film, was used to determine the overall delivery precision through comparison of a measured dose distribution on film to calculated dose. The average net translational difference between a known shift applied to a phantom and that detected by MVCT image fusion was 0.62 mm. Setup reproducibility of the head frame was measured with both MVCT and optical tracking. The frame setup precision was found to be well within 1 mm for translations as well as rotations. A system delivery verification test in phantom using film showed spatial agreement between planned and delivered dose distributions to within 1 mm.

On the impact of longitudinal breathing motion randomness for tomotherapy delivery.

The purpose of this study is to explain the unplanned longitudinal dose modulations that appear in helical tomotherapy (HT) dose distributions in the presence of irregular patient breathing. This explanation is developed by the use of longitudinal (1D) simulations of mock and surrogate data and tested with a fully 4D HT delivered plan. The 1D simulations use a typical mock breathing function which allows more flexibility to adjust various parameters. These simplified simulations are then made more realistic by using 100 surrogate waveforms all similarly scaled to produce longitudinal breathing displacements. The results include the observation that, with many waveforms used simultaneously, a voxel-by-voxel probability of a dose error from breathing is found to be proportional to the realistically random breathing amplitude relative to the beam width if the PTV is larger than the beam width and the breathing displacement amplitude. The 4D experimental test confirms that regular breathing will not result in these modulations because of the insensitivity to leaf motion for low-frequency dynamics such as breathing. These modulations mostly result from a varying average of the breathing displacements along the beam edge gradients. Regular breathing has no displacement variation over many breathing cycles. Some low-frequency interference is also possible in real situations. In the absence of more sophisticated motion management, methods that reduce the breathing amplitude or make the breathing very regular are indicated. However, for typical breathing patterns and magnitudes, motion management techniques may not be required with HT because typical breathing occurs mostly between fundamental HT treatment temporal and spatial scales. A movement beyond only discussing margins is encouraged for intensity modulated radiotherapy such that patient and machine motion interference will be minimized and beneficial averaging maximized. These results are found for homogeneous and longitudinal on-axis delivery for unplanned longitudinal dose modulations.

Image-guided helical Tomotherapy for treatment of spine tumors.

OBJECTIVES: One of the most common indications for radiotherapy is treatment of the spine. The vast majority of cases are related to metastatic disease with primary tumors of the spine being rare. Conventional radiation therapy often plays an important role in the management of spine tumors although at times with significant side effects and disadvantages. Furthermore, retreatment of spine tumors is a challenge due to concerns over spinal cord toxicity. In this series, we examine the efficacy of using image-guided helical Tomotherapy and the possible advantages offered by this new technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients at Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian were treated between November 2005 and November 2006. The median age was 66 years. Of the eight patients, seven had metastatic disease with one patient having a primary neuroendocrine tumor of the spine. Five patients were previously treated to the spine with conventional radiation planning. Two patients received single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (15 Gy) while the remaining patients received hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a median total dose of 2,500 cGy in 500 cGy fractions. RESULTS: At the time of last follow-up, radiographic control was seen in all eight patients with a median local control rate of 2.5 months (range of 1-5.8 months). Four of the eight patients are still alive with median overall survival of 5.1 months (range 1.4-6.9 months). Acute toxicity ranged from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score 0-2 and no patients experienced late complications of radiation myelitis. CONCLUSIONS: The TomoTherapy Hi-ART system can be an alternative treatment option for upfront or retreatment of spine tumors. Minimal acute and late toxicity were seen in patients treated with Tomotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiation delivery combined with megavoltage CT image guidance offered by the TomoTherapy Hi-ART system allows for set-up and delivery accuracy that is required for stereotactic treatment of spine tumors and eliminates the need for any internal or external fiducial marker placement.

Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems.

Fixed-field treatments, delivered using conventional clinical linear accelerators fitted with multileaf collimators, have rapidly become the standard form of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several innovative nonstandard alternatives also exist, for which delivery and treatment planning systems are now commercially available. Three of these nonstandard IMRT approaches are reviewed here: tomotherapy, robotic linear accelerators (CyberKnife, Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), and standard linear accelerators modulated by jaws alone or by their jaws acting together with a tertiary beam-masking device. Rationales for the nonstandard IMRT approaches are discussed, and elements of their delivery system designs are briefly described. Differences between fixed-field IMRT dose distributions and the distributions that can be delivered by using the nonstandard technologies are outlined. Because conventional linear accelerators are finely honed machines, innovative design enhancement of one aspect of system performance often limits another facet of machine capability. Consequently the various delivery systems may prove optimal for different types of treatment, with specific machine designs excelling for disease sites with specific target volume and normal structure topologies. However it is likely that the delivery systems will be distinguished not just by the optimality of the dose distributions they deliver, but also by factors such as the efficiency of their treatment process, the integration of their onboard imaging systems into that process, and their ability to measure and minimize or compensate for target movement, including the effects of respiratory motion.

Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate helical tomotherapy and linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) techniques in the treatment of skull-base tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients diagnosed with skull-base tumors, originally planned for optically guided FSRT to prescribed doses of 50.4-54 Gy were replanned for treatment with clinically deliverable helical tomotherapy. All original CT scans, MR-CT fusion defined target and normal structure contours, and PTV margins were used for helical tomotherapy planning. Linac based plans utilized one of the following FSRT planning techniques: non-coplanar or coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), multiple non-coplanar conformal arcs, and non-coplanar conformal radiation therapy (CRT). These plans were used as the standard to which the subsequent tomotherapy plans were compared, using the following criteria: prescription isodose to target volume (PITV) ratios, an inhomogeneity index (II), equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for PTV volumes, mean normalized total doses (NTDmean) for critical structures, and size of 10, 20, and 30 Gy isodose volumes. RESULTS: Use of both linac based FSRT techniques and helical tomotherapy generated highly conformal treatment plans. Tomotherapy plans, which are predominantly coplanar in nature, compared to non-coplanar linac based plans exhibited increased PITV ratios, variable change in II, similar EUD values, and generally comparable NTD(mean) values for organs at risk. When compared to non-coplanar field arrangements, deliverable (as opposed to idealized) tomotherapy plans also resulted in 13-540% increases in low dose isodose volumes. All criteria except for the II, which was generally improved with tomotherapy, were found to be similar when coplanar linac based plans were compared to helical tomotherapy plans. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a distinct advantage in using non-coplanar beam arrangements for treatment of skull-base tumors. In the case where disease spreads far inferiorly, limiting the ability to use non-coplanar arrangements, helical tomotherapy can be used to generate a comparable treatment plan, with potentially superior homogeneity.