Retrospective Analysis of Causes and Risk Factors of 30-Day Readmission After Spine Surgery for Thoracolumbar Trauma.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate readmission rates, risk factors, and reason for unplanned 30-day readmissions after thoracolumbar spine trauma surgery. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing operative treatment for thoracic or lumbar trauma with open or minimally invasive surgical approach at a Level 1 urban trauma center. Patients were divided into two groups based on 30-day readmission status. Reason for readmission, reoperation rates, injury type, trauma severity, and incidence of polytrauma were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients, 69.9% male with an average age of 47 ± 19 years were included. The readmitted group included 16 patients (5.1%) of which 9 (56%) were readmitted for medical complications and 7 for surgical complications. Wound complications (31.3% of readmissions) were the most common cause of readmission, followed by non-wound related sepsis (18.9% of readmissions). A total of 6 patients (37.5%) required reoperation; 2 instrumentation failures underwent revision surgery, and 4 wound complications underwent irrigation and debridement. Patients with higher Injury Severity Scale (ISS) were more likely to be readmitted (27.8% vs 22.1%, P = .045). Concomitant lower limb surgery increased odds of readmission (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.10-17.83; P = .037). CONCLUSION: Spine trauma 30-day readmission rate was 5.1%, comparable to those reported in the elective spine surgery literature. Readmitted patients were more likely to sustain concomitant operative lower limb trauma. Wound complications were the most common cause of readmission, and almost half of the patients were readmitted due to surgery-related complications.

Impact of Preoperative Platelet Count on Bleeding Risk and Allogeneic Transfusion in Multilevel Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational cohort study of patients receiving multilevel thoracic and lumbar spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify which patients are at high risk for allogeneic transfusion which may allow for better preoperative planning and employment of specific blood management strategies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Multilevel posterior spine surgery is associated with a significant risk for major blood loss, and allogeneic blood transfusion is common in spine surgery. METHODS: A univariate logistic regression model was used to identify variables that were significantly associated with intraoperative allogeneic transfusion. A multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression model was then used to measure the adjusted association of these variables with intraoperative transfusion. RESULTS: Multilevel thoracic and lumbar spine surgery was performed in 921 patients. When stratifying patients by preoperative platelet count, patients with pre-operative thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia had a significantly higher rate of transfusion than those who were not thrombocytopenic. Furthermore, those with severe thrombocytopenia had a higher rate of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion than those with higher platelet counts. Multivariate logistic regression found that preoperative platelet count was the most significant contributor to transfusion, with a platelet count ≤100 having an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of transfusion of 4.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-15.02, P = 0.006). Similarly, a platelet count between 101and 150 also doubled the risk of transfusion with an adjusted OR of 2.02 (95% CI 1.01-4.04, P = 0.047). The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score increased the OR of transfusion by 2.5 times (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.54-4.13), whereas preoperative prothrombin time and age minimally increased the risk. CONCLUSION: Preoperative thrombocytopenia significantly contributes to intraoperative transfusion in multilevel thoracic lumbar spine surgery. Identifying factors that may increase the risk for transfusion could be of great benefit in better preoperative counseling of patients and in reducing overall cost and postoperative complications by implementing strategies and techniques to reduce blood loss and blood transfusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: As hospital compensation becomes increasingly dependent on pay-for-performance and bundled payment compensation models, hospitals seek to reduce costs and increase quality. To our knowledge, no reported data compare these measures between hospital settings for elective lumbar procedures. The study compares hospital-reported outcomes and costs for elective lumbar procedures performed at a tertiary hospital (TH) versus community hospitals (CH) within a single health care system. METHODS: Retrospective review of a physician-maintained, prospectively collected database consisting of 1 TH and 4 CH for 3 common lumbar surgeries from 2015 to 2016. Patients undergoing primary elective microdiscectomy for disc herniation, laminectomy for spinal stenosis, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were excluded for traumatic, infectious, or malignant pathology. Comparing hospital settings, outcomes included length of stay (LOS), rates of 30-day readmissions, potentially preventable complications (PPC), and discharge to rehabilitation facility, and hospital costs. RESULTS: A total of 892 patients (n = 217 microdiscectomies, n = 302 laminectomies, and n = 373 laminectomy fusions) were included. The TH served a younger patient population with fewer comorbid conditions and a higher proportion of African Americans. The TH performed more decompressions (P < .001) per level fused; the CH performed more interbody fusions (P = .007). Cost of performing microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy (P = .014) was significantly higher at the TH, but there was no significant difference for laminectomy with fusion. In a multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, the TH was significantly more expensive for single-level microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy with single-level fusion (P < .001), but trended toward significance for laminectomy without fusion (P = .052). No difference existed for PPC or readmissions rate. Patients undergoing laminectomy without fusion were discharged to a facility more often at the TH (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: We provide hospital-reported outcomes between a TH and CH. Significant differences in patient characteristics and surgical practices exist between surgical settings. Despite minimal differences in hospital-reported outcomes, the TH was significantly more expensive.