Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 10(10): e0140374, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26489088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to evaluate, in a ligature-induced peri-implantitis model, the efficacy of three antimicrobial glassy coatings in the prevention of biofilm formation, intrasulcular bacterial growth and the resulting peri-implant bone loss. METHODS: Mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from five beagle dogs. Four dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Eight weeks after, one control zirconia abutment and three with different bactericidal coatings (G1n-Ag, ZnO35, G3) were connected. After a plaque control period, bacterial accumulation was allowed and biofilm formation on abutments was observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Peri-implantitis was induced by cotton ligatures. Microbial samples and peri-implant crestal bone levels of all implant sites were obtained before, during and after the breakdown period. RESULTS: During experimental induce peri-implantitis: colony forming units counts from intrasulcular microbial samples at implants with G1n-Ag coated abutment remained close to the basal inoculum; G3 and ZnO35 coatings showed similar low counts; and anaerobic bacterias counts at control abutments exhibited a logarithmic increase by more than 2. Bone loss during passive breakdown period was no statistically significant. Additional bone loss occurred during ligature-induce breakdown: 0.71 (SD 0.48) at G3 coating, 0.57 (SD 0.36) at ZnO35 coating, 0.74 (SD 0.47) at G1n-Ag coating, and 1.29 (SD 0.45) at control abutments; and statistically significant differences (p<0.001) were found. The lowest bone loss at the end of the experiment was exhibited by implants dressing G3 coated abutments (mean 2.1; SD 0.42). SIGNIFICANCE: Antimicrobial glassy coatings could be a useful tool to ward off, diminish or delay peri-implantitis progression.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/growth & development , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Animals , Bacteria/growth & development , Bicuspid/surgery , Biofilms/drug effects , Calcium Compounds/pharmacology , Dental Abutments/microbiology , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dogs , Glass/chemistry , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Models, Animal , Osseointegration , Oxides/pharmacology , Silver/pharmacology , Sodium Hydroxide/pharmacology , Surface Properties , Yeasts/growth & development , Zinc Oxide/analogs & derivatives , Zinc Oxide/pharmacology
2.
PLoS One ; 7(12): e52861, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23285206

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study is to evaluate bone loss at implant abutments coated with a soda-lime glass containing silver nanoparticles subjected to experimental peri-implantitis. Five beagle dogs were used in the experiments, 3 implants were installed in each quadrant of the mandibles. Glass/n-Ag coted abutments were connected to implant platform. Cotton floss ligatures were placed in a submarginal position around the abutment necks and the animals were subject to a diet which allowed plaque accumulation, and after 15 weeks the dogs were sacrificed. Radiographs of all implant sites were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the experimentally induced peri-implantitis. The radiographic examination indicated that significant amounts of additional bone loss occurred in implants without biocide coating, considering both absolute and relative values of bone loss. Percentages of additional bone loss observed in implants dressed with a biocide coated abutment were about 3 times lower (p<0.006 distal aspect; and p<0.031 at mesial aspect) than the control ones. Within the limits of the present study it seems promising the use of soda-lime glass/nAg coatings on abutments to prevent peri-implant diseases.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Dental Abutments , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Maxillary Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Peri-Implantitis/diagnostic imaging , Titanium , Algorithms , Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Animals , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/adverse effects , Coated Materials, Biocompatible/pharmacology , Dental Abutments/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/microbiology , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dogs , Maxillary Diseases/etiology , Peri-Implantitis/complications , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Radiography , Surface Properties , Titanium/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...