Histopathologic resolution of adult liver transplantation adenovirus hepatitis with cidofovir and intravenous immunoglobulin: a case report.

Adenovirus (ADV) infections in adult solid organ transplant recipients, although rare, are associated with high mortality. There are no randomized controlled trials establishing the efficacy of specific treatment modalities. To our knowledge apparent response to treatment with combination therapy with intravenous cidofovir (CDV) and immunoglobulin (IVIG) has only been demonstrated in 2 adult renal transplant recipients in whom ADV was documented in body fluids only. We describe an adult liver transplant recipient diagnosed with ADV hepatitis based on positive immunohistochemical staining of a liver biopsy specimen, positive blood ADV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and treated with the combination of CDV and IVIG. We demonstrated both clearance of viremia and histopathologic resolution of the hepatitis despite the patient's fatal outcome. To our knowledge this is the only case documenting eradication of tissue-invasive ADV disease in any solid organ transplant recipient using CDV and IVIG. This case provides evidence to support the use of this drug combination, which has many potential toxicities that might discourage its use otherwise.

The anti-viral effect of sorafenib in hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is currently the only approved systemic therapy shown to have efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies suggest that hepatitis C (HCV)-related HCC patients derive more clinical benefit from sorafenib than other subgroups, but the mechanism for this effect is unknown. In vitro data suggest that sorafenib may exert anti-viral properties, and thus our aim in this study was to evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC. AIM: To evaluate potential anti-viral activity of sorafenib in patients with HCV-related HCC. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with HCV-related HCC treated with sorafenib for up to 6 months. Baseline clinical, viral and oncologic data were collected. Patients' HCV viral loads were obtained at various time points, and compared with their baseline viral levels. No patients received any known anti-viral therapy during this time. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified with baseline and subsequent HCV levels available for analysis. Six patients completed 6 months of full dose sorafenib, and comparisons of their HCV viral loads showed no significant change at week 24 (difference of means = 0.3500, CI: -0.1799-0.8799, P = 0.150), or the interim time points. Similarly, the HCV viral loads of all patients who received sorafenib and the viral loads of those patients who had tumour response to sorafenib showed no significant changes at any time point. CONCLUSION: Despite preclinical data and previous subgroup analyses suggesting that sorafenib has an anti-viral effect against HCV, this study suggests that sorafenib lacks significant anti-viral activity in HCV patients with HCC.

The combination of sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard of practice involves using transarterial therapy for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) alone and sorafenib only for more advanced HCC, but the sorafenib and transarterial therapy combination may provide greater efficacy. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy in HCC. METHODS: Consecutive cases of HCC were treated with sorafenib and transarterial therapy, receiving sorafenib 2 to 4weeks before transarterial therapy. Baseline clinical parameters, adverse events (AEs) and survival were collected. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients received sorafenib and transarterial therapy. The majority of the patients were male (70%) with HCV (60%), median age of 60years, good performance status (0-1), stable cirrhosis (Child: A 72%; B 28%), unresectable tumour (stage: B 81%; C 19%) and median AFP of 24ng/mL. Median follow-up was 12months and median time on sorafenib was 6months. LC Bead TACE was used with a median frequency of 3. The majority of the patients (89%) experienced AEs. The most common AEs were fatigue (51%), hand-foot skin reaction (51%) and diarrhoea (43%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs included fatigue (13%) and hand-foot skin reaction (26%). Most patients required a dose reduction (66%). The main AE related to transarterial therapy was post-TACE syndrome (23%). The disease control rate was 68% at 6months. Overall median survival rate was 18.5months (95% CI 16.1-20.9months). CONCLUSION: Concurrent sorafenib and transarterial therapy is overall safe with no unexpected side effects and encouraging efficacy that warrants further study.

Pilot study: fenofibrate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid.

BACKGROUND: Newer therapies are needed for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Fenofibrate is a fibric acid postulated to regulate immune response and cell proliferation. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and incomplete response to UDCA. METHODS: We undertook a pilot study involving 20 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 2× ULN. Nonparametric statistical tests and Spearman correlation test were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty patients received fenofibrate (160 mg/day) in addition to UDCA for 48 weeks. Median serum ALP decreased significantly at 48 weeks compared with baseline values [351 (214-779) U/L at baseline vs. 177 (60-384) U/L at 48 weeks, P < 0.05]. A rebound in ALP occurred upon drug discontinuation. Serum aspartate aminotransferase and Immunoglobulin M also decreased significantly, while bilirubin and albumin remained unchanged. Median IL-1 decreased from 28.9 (2.7-10 000) to 11.3 (2.5-277.7) pg/mL (P = 0.049), and median IL-6 from 4.6 (3.2-5205) to 3.5 (3.2-73.4) pg/mL (P = 0.027). Heartburn was the most frequent adverse event, leading to discontinuation of two study subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of fenofibrate and UDCA induced significant biochemical improvement in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and incomplete response to UDCA. Further studies are warranted.

Impact of virologic breakthrough and HBIG regimen on hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

The availability of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and several oral antiviral therapies has reduced but not eliminated hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. We aimed to determine the rate of HBV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in relation to virologic breakthrough pre-OLT and HBIG regimens post-OLT. Data from the NIH HBV-OLT database were analyzed. A total of 183 patients transplanted between 2001 and 2007 followed for a median of 42 months (range 1-81) post-OLT were studied. At transplant, 29% were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (+), 38.5% had HBV DNA > 5 log(10) copies/mL, 74% were receiving antiviral therapy. Twenty-five patients experienced virologic breakthrough before OLT. Post-OLT, 26%, 22%, 40% and 12% of patients received intravenous (IV) high-dose, IV low-dose, intramuscular low-dose and a finite duration of HBIG, respectively as maintenance prophylaxis. All but two patients also received antiviral therapy. Cumulative rates of HBV recurrence at 1 and 5 years were 3% and 9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that listing HBeAg status and HBV DNA level at OLT were the only factors associated with HBV recurrence. In conclusion, low rates of HBV recurrence can be accomplished with all the HBIG regimens used when combined with antiviral therapy including patients with breakthrough pre-OLT as long as rescue therapy is administered pre- and post-OLT.

Liver retransplantation: a single-center outcome and financial analysis.

Retransplantation of the liver (re-OLTx) accounts for approximately 10% of all liver transplants in the United States. The decision to offer a patient a second liver transplant has significant financial, ethical, and outcome implications. This large, single-center experience describes some outcome and financial data to consider when making this decision. One thousand three liver transplants were performed in 921 patients at our center. Patients were divided into adult and pediatric groups, and further by whether they received a single transplant or more than one. Overall survival, variation in survival by timing of re-OLTx, and survival in adults with hepatitis C were investigated, as were hospital charges and cost of re-OLTx. Adults, but not children, had a significant decrement in survival following a second transplant. Second transplants more than double the cost of the initial transplant, but there is a significantly higher cost associated with early retransplantation compared to the cost associated with late retransplantation (costs of first and second transplants included in both cases). This difference is due to a longer length of stay and associated cost in the ICU. Adult patients retransplanted early have the same overall survival compared to those done late. The sample size of the adult HCV re-OLTx population was too small to reach statistical significance despite their observed poorer outcome.

Anti-interleukin-2 receptor therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil is associated with more severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.

The pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood, but the cellular immune response is likely to have a major role. Daclizumab, an interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody that blunts T-cell activation, leading to a decreased risk for cellular rejection, is used frequently in transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of daclizumab therapy on the incidence and severity of recurrent HCV. Forty-one liver transplant recipients (21 patients, HCV positive; 20 patients, HCV negative) at high risk for neurological or renal complications of calcineurin inhibitors were administered daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids in the early post-LT period, followed by tacrolimus and a steroid taper. All patients were followed up prospectively for graft function and disease recurrence with protocol liver biopsies day 7, month 4, and yearly. Compared with patients without HCV, patients with HCV administered daclizumab had greater 4-month serum alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. These biochemical differences resolved by 12 months, except for persistent elevation of ALT levels. Compared with a well-matched HCV control population, patients with HCV administered daclizumab were more likely to have an earlier onset of hepatitis, jaundice, and greater histological activity. Recurrent hepatitis progressed more rapidly in the daclizumab group; 45% developed advanced disease within 1 year. HCV viral load in the daclizumab group was significantly greater at both 4 months and 1 year. Results of this study suggest that the use of adjuvant IL-2R antibodies in combination with MMF in the early peritransplantation period may be associated with early recurrence of hepatitis C and more rapid histological progression of disease.