Mid-term Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease Remission and Predictive Factors: A Prospective Study with a Focus on Non-invasive Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now termed metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), is a growing health concern associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Bariatric surgery offers potential benefits, but its impact on MAFLD remains incompletely understood, with scarce long-term follow-up prospective studies. Moreover, being liver biopsy the gold standard for liver condition measurement, the need for non-invasive techniques that allow the assessment of MAFLD development after bariatric surgery is imperative. OWLiver® Care and OWLiver® represent two serum lipidomic tests, featuring panels comprising 11 and 20 triglycerides, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving 80 Caucasians to assess the effects of bariatric surgery on MAFLD using non-invasive diagnostics and to identify baseline predictors of MAFLD remission. Serum samples were collected before surgery and at a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: After 3 years, the proportion of patients exhibiting a healthy liver escalated from 5.0% at baseline to 26.3%. Conversely, the percentage of steatohepatitis declined from 35.1% to a mere 7.6%. Younger age, female gender, and the absence of type 2 diabetes were associated with MAFLD remission. However, age stood as the only independent variable associated with this favorable liver evolution (R2 = 0.112). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery demonstrates mid-term benefits in improving MAFLD, with younger age as a baseline predictor of remission. Non-invasive diagnostic methods, like OWLiver®, are valuable tools for monitoring MAFLD evolution. Further research with larger populations and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine personalized treatment approaches.

Influence of nutritional status on clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several factors that worsen the prognosis of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 have been identified, such as obesity or diabetes. However, despite that nutrition may change in a lockdown situation, little is known about the influence of malnutrition among subjects hospitalized due to COVID-19. Our study aimed to assess whether the presence of malnutrition among patients admitted due to COVID-19 had any impact on clinical outcomes compared with patients with the same condition but well nourished. METHODS: 75 patients admitted to hospital due to COVID-19 were analyzed cross-sectionally. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) was completed by phone interview. Clinical parameters included were extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: According to the SGA, 27 admitted due to a COVID-19 infection had malnutrition. Patients not well nourished were older than patients with a SGA grade A (65 ± 14.1 vs 49 ± 15.1 years; p < 0.0001). Length of hospital stay among poorly nourished patients was significantly higher (18.4 ± 15.6 vs 8.5 ± 7.7 days; p = 0.001). Mortality rates and admission to ICU were greater among subjects with any degree of malnutrition compared with well-nourished patients (7.4% vs 0%; p = 0.05 and 44.4% vs 6.3%; p < 0.0001). CRP (120.9 ± 106.2 vs 60.8 ± 62.9 mg/l; p = 0.03), D-dimer (1516.9 ± 1466.9 vs 461.1 ± 353.7 ng/mL; p < 0.0001) and ferritin (847.8 ± 741.1 vs 617.8 ± 598.7mcg/l; p = 0.03) were higher in the group with malnutrition. Haemoglobin (11.6 ± 2.1 vs 13.6 ± 1.5 g/dl; p < 0.0001) and albumin 3.2 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 0.5 g/dl; p < 0.0001) were lower in patients with any degree of malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a poor nutritional status is related to a longer stay in hospital, a greater admission in the ICU and a higher mortality.