Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull ; 40(2): 85-8, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26415346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to compare hemophilic patients' fingerprint types with the normal people to help diagnose the disease, particularly new occurrences of the disease. METHOD: This case-control study was conducted in 2012. Sixty two patients with hemophilia type A and 62 normal healthy people were selected. The type of fingerprint was determined by a forensic specialist who was kept unaware of the participants' group. Using advanced Henry method, the main types of fingerprints were classified as arch, loop, whorl, as well as other types. RESULTS: In the control group, loop type (65%) and in the case group the whorl type (34%) were the most frequent fingerprint type (p < 0.001) and there was a significant difference of fingerprint in each finger between two groups. In addition, the average number of whorl type in the patients with mild disease was significantly higher and the average number of arch and other types of fingerprints was significantly lower than patients with moderate or severe disease. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study indicated that not only are the fingerprints of normal and hemophilic people different, but also a difference was observed between hemophilic patients with the mild factor level and patients with moderate or severe one.


Subject(s)
Dermatoglyphics , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Case-Control Studies , Humans
2.
Med J Malaysia ; 66(4): 342-5, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22299554

ABSTRACT

With the establishment of the inadequate efficiency of atropines and oximes in reducing morbidity and mortality of patients poisoned by organophosphates, more attention is given to using other methods such as Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) as a bioscavenger to mop up organophosphate toxins. This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 56 organophosphate poisoned patients who were randomly assigned to the FFP and control groups in order of admission. The routine treatment in both groups included atropine and, in moderate to severe cases of poisoning, pralidoxime. The FFP group received four packs of FFP as stat dose at the beginning of treatment. No significant difference was seen between the two groups on the atropine and pralidoxime dosage, hospitalization length and mortality. The present study showed that using four packs of FFP as stat dose at the onset of treatment had no significant effect on the clinical course of organophosphate poisoned patients.


Subject(s)
Organophosphate Poisoning , Plasma , Adult , Atropine/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pralidoxime Compounds/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...