Laparoscopic anatomic vs. nonanatomic liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (≥5 cm) in the right lobe.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impacts and outcomes of laparoscopic anatomic liver resection (LAR) and laparoscopic nonanatomic resection (LNAR) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the right lobe of the liver. BACKGROUND: There are few comparative studies of LAR and LNAR for large HCC. METHOD: Three hundred thirty-seven patients underwent liver resection for large HCC (≥5 cm) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between January 2004 and December 2022. After the exclusion of patients treated with open hepatic resection and those who had left-lobe or bilobar tumors, 94 patients were ultimately included. Patients were divided into LAR group (61 patients) and LNAR group (33 patients). After propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 matching, 31 patients were included in each group. The outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: LAR group had longer operative time than LNAR group (333.7 ± 113.7 vs 210 ± 117.6 min, respectively, P < 0.001), wider safety margin (1.4 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 0.7 cm, respectively, P = 0.015), and lower incidence of recurrence (25.8% vs. 54.8%, respectively, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: LAR required longer operative time, achieved wider safety margin, and had lower incidence of recurrence than LNAR.

Successful use of venous graft from native liver with hepatocellular carcinoma during living donor liver transplantation with no impact on recurrence rate: A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: There are still debates regarding using portal vein (PV) from liver with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for vascular reconstruction. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and patency of PV venous graft from an explanted liver with HCC for the reconstruction of the hepatic veins tributaries or PV in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to see if it has any risk on recurrence of HCC. Patient and methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 81 patients with HCC who underwent LDLT from April 2004 to July 2022. Results: Venous graft from native liver PV was used for vascular reconstruction in 31 patients as follows; reconstruction of V5 in 7 patients, V8 in 4 patients, V6 in 3 patients, combined V5 and V8 in 4 patients, V6 with V5/V8 in 5 patients, and as Y shape venous graft for 2 PV reconstruction in 8 patients. The implantation of the new conduit PV graft after reconstruction of the anterior sector tributaries was direct to the IVC in 8 patients, and to the common orifice of the left and middle hepatic veins in 12 patients. The 1 month, 3 months, and 1-year overall patency of the venous graft was 93.5%, 90.3%, and 84%, respectively. Nine patients had recurrent HCC. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for HCC recurrence were AFP >400 ng/mL (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.69-2.31, P = 0.01), moderate/poor differentiated tumor (HR = 3.06, 95% CI: 2.58-6.29, P = 0.02), and microvascular invasion (HR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.05-1.93, P = 0.01). Using a PV venous graft had no risk factor for HCC recurrence (P = 0.9). Conclusion: The use of PV venous graft of native liver with HCC for venous reconstruction is a feasible and valuable option in LDLT with good patency rates and no risk of HCC recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; basiliximab is used to allow delayed introduction of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation and thus delay their renal insult. However, there is only little evidence for the safety and the efficacy of this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of basiliximab induction in liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 89 patients who were classified into two groups: standard triple immunosuppression (IS) regimen of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 47) and induction IS regimen of basiliximab, low dose steroids and MMF with delayed introduction of CNI (n = 42). All patients were followed after liver transplantation for at least six months or until death. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft dysfunction, infection rate or type, or wound healing between both groups. The acute rejection rate was equivalent in both groups. Renal dysfunction in the first six months post-transplant was less in the basiliximab group in comparison to the other group (7.1% and 19.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients.