Refined estimates of local recurrence risks by DCIS score adjusting for clinicopathological features: a combined analysis of ECOG-ACRIN E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort studies.

PURPOSE: Better tools are needed to estimate local recurrence (LR) risk after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS. The DCIS score (DS) was validated as a predictor of LR in E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort (ODC) after BCS. We combined data from E5194 and ODC adjusting for clinicopathological factors to provide refined estimates of the 10-year risk of LR after treatment by BCS alone. METHODS: Data from E5194 and ODC were combined. Patients with positive margins or multifocality were excluded. Identical Cox regression models were fit for each study. Patient-specific meta-analysis was used to calculate precision-weighted estimates of 10-year LR risk by DS, age, tumor size and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: The combined cohort includes 773 patients. The DS and age at diagnosis, tumor size and year of diagnosis provided independent prognostic information on the 10-year LR risk (p ≤ 0.009). Hazard ratios from E5194 and ODC cohorts were similar for the DS (2.48, 1.95 per 50 units), tumor size ≤ 1 versus  > 1-2.5 cm (1.45, 1.47), age ≥ 50 versus < 50 year (0.61, 0.84) and year ≥ 2000 (0.67, 0.49). Utilization of DS combined with tumor size and age at diagnosis predicted more women with very low (≤ 8%) or higher (> 15%) 10-year LR risk after BCS alone compared to utilization of DS alone or clinicopathological factors alone. CONCLUSIONS: The combined analysis provides refined estimates of 10-year LR risk after BCS for DCIS. Adding information on tumor size and age at diagnosis to the DS adjusting for year of diagnosis provides improved LR risk estimates to guide treatment decision making.

Effect of time interval between surgery and preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin on outcomes in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is now considered "standard of care." However, the optimal time interval for resection after neoadjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: Between 11/90 and 11/04, 107 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative chemo/RT at the University of Pennsylvania. Fifty-six percent had LAR and 40% had APR. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/oxaliplatin in 28% and 5-FU in 72% of patients. All patients received preoperative RT. RESULTS: A longer time interval between chemo/RT and surgery was associated with tumor downstaging (OR 1.24, P = 0.02). A longer time interval was not associated with: nodal downstaging (OR 1.00, P = 0.98); pathologic complete response (PCR) (OR 0.97, P = 0.80); likelihood of performing an LAR (OR 0.90, P = 0.47); improved disease free survival (DFS), local control, or distant control (HR 1.05, P = 0.49; HR 1.14, P = 0.22; HR 1.06, P = 0.52, respectively). The PCR rate was 34.5% in the 5-FU/oxaliplatin/radiation group, and 13.7% in the 5-FU/radiation group. If patients with microscopic CR were excluded, then the PCR rate for 5FU/OX was 21.4% and for 5-FU was 12.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Time interval between surgery and chemo/RT appeared to have little effect on PCR or LAR rates. Patients receiving 5 FU/oxaliplatin/RT had a high PCR rate. A prospective randomized trial to test superiority of 5 FU/oxaliplatin is warranted.

Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The outcome for women with a local failure after breast conservation treatment is not well described in the literature. Because local recurrence is a potentially salvageable event, this study was performed to evaluate the outcome of patients with local recurrence after breast conservation surgery and definitive radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of 112 patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. There were 100 isolated local recurrences and 12 local-plus-regional recurrences. There were 93 invasive local recurrences and 19 DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) local recurrences. Local recurrences were detected by physical examination alone in 42 patients, mammography alone in 47 patients, and both modalities in 23 patients. All patients were initially treated with breast conservation treatment with or without systemic therapy and subsequently treated at the time of local recurrence with salvage mastectomy with or without systemic therapy. The mean and median follow-up times after local recurrence were 49 and 44 months, respectively. RESULTS: For the entire group of 112 patients, the overall survival at 10 years after local recurrence was 69%, the cause-specific survival was 71%, and the freedom from distant metastases was 47%. For the 93 patients with an invasive local recurrence, the overall survival at 10 years was 64%, cause-specific survival was 67%, and freedom from distant metastases was 44%. For the 93 patients with an invasive local recurrence, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence (< or =2 years vs. 2.1-5 years vs. >5 years) predicted for overall survival at 5 years (65% vs. 84% vs. 89%; p = 0.03). Method of detection of local recurrence (physical examination vs. mammography vs. both methods) also predicted for 5-year overall survival (73% vs. 91% vs. 93%, respectively; p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence was an independent predictor of overall survival (p = 0.03). Method of detection of local recurrence (physical examination vs. mammography vs. both methods) was borderline in predicting for 5-year cause-specific survival (73% vs. 91% vs. 93%, respectively; p = 0.06). Similarly, interval from diagnosis to local recurrence (< or =2 years vs. 2.1-5 years vs. >5 years) was a borderline predictor of 5-year cause-specific survival (65% vs. 84% vs. 89%; p = 0.08). No factors that predicted for freedom from distant metastases were identified. There were three second locoregional failures on the chest wall. Two of the 19 patients with a DCIS local recurrence have died of metastatic breast cancer. Death was probably not related to their local recurrence, but rather a result of persistent risk from an invasive primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides long-term data after salvage treatment for patients who experience local recurrence after breast conservation treatment. The variables of method of detection and interval from diagnosis to local recurrence are identified as having prognostic significance for overall and cause-specific survival. In view of the potential for long-term survival, aggressive attempt at salvage treatment is warranted for the patient with local recurrence after breast conservation treatment. Second local recurrence after salvage mastectomy is an uncommon event. Although DCIS local recurrences may not in themselves cause an increase in the risk of mortality, the risk from the primary invasive cancer persists.

Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the long-term outcome for women with mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis was performed of 422 mammographically detected intraductal breast carcinomas in 418 women from 11 institutions in North America and Europe. All patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years (mean, 9.4 years; range, 0.1-19.8 years). RESULTS: The 15-year overall survival rate was 92%, and the 15-year cause-specific survival rate was 98%. The 15-year rate of freedom from distant metastases was 94%. There were 48 local failures in the treated breast, and the 15-year rate of any local failure was 16%. The median time to local failure was 5.0 years (mean, 5.7 years; range, 1.0-15.2 years). Patient age at the time of treatment and final pathology margin status from the primary tumor excision were both significantly associated with local failure. The 10-year rate of local failure was 31% for patient age < or = 39 years, 13% for age 40-49 years, 8% for age 50-59 years, and 6% for age > or = 60 years (p = 0.0001). The 10-year rate of local failure was 24% when the margins of resection were positive, 9% when the margins of resection were negative, 7% when the margins of resection were close, and 12% when the margins of resection were unknown (p = 0.030). Patient age < or = 39 years and positive margins of resection were both independently associated with an increased risk of local failure (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.023, respectively) in the multivariable Cox regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The 15-year results from the present study demonstrated high rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, and freedom from distant metastases following the treatment of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Younger age and positive margins of resection were both independently associated with an increased risk of local failure. The 15-year results in the present study serve as an important benchmark for comparison with other treatment modalities. These results support the use of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of appropriately selected patients with mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of breast carcinoma have led to a multidisciplinary approach to management for patients with breast carcinoma. To assess the effect of this approach, the authors performed an evaluation for a cohort of patients examined in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center. METHODS: An analysis was performed for the records of 75 consecutive women with 77 breast lesions examined in consultation in a multidisciplinary breast cancer center between January and June 1998. Each patient's case was evaluated by a panel consisting of a medical oncologist, surgical oncologist, radiation oncologist, pathologist, diagnostic radiologist, and, when indicated, plastic surgeon. A comprehensive history and physical examination was performed, and the relevant mammograms, pathology slides, and medical records were reviewed. Treatment recommendations made before this evaluation were compared with the consensus recommendations made by the panel. RESULTS: For the 75 patients, the multidisciplinary panel disagreed with the treatment recommendations from the outside physicians in 32 cases (43%), and agreed in 41 cases (55%). Two patients (3%) had no treatment recommendation before consultation. For the 32 patients with a disagreement, the treatment recommendations were breast-conservation treatment instead of mastectomy (n = 13; 41%) or reexcision (n = 2; 6%); further workup instead of immediate definitive treatment (n = 10; 31%); treatment based on major change in diagnosis on pathology review (n = 3; 9%); addition of postmastectomy radiation treatment (n = 3; 9%); or addition of hormonal therapy (n = 1; 3%). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary breast cancer evaluation program provided an integrated program in which individual patients were evaluated by a team of physicians and led to a change in treatment recommendation for 43% (32 of 75) of the patients examined. This multidisciplinary program provided important second opinions for many patients with breast carcinoma.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine indications for the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axillary lymph nodes or locally advanced disease who receive systemic therapy. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: The benefits and risks of PMRT in such patients, as well as subgroups of these patients, were considered. The details of the PMRT technique were also evaluated. OUTCOMES: The outcomes considered included freedom from local-regional recurrence, survival (disease-free and overall), and long-term toxicity. EVIDENCE: An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through July 2000; certain investigators were contacted for more recent and, in some cases, unpublished information. A computerized search was performed of MEDLINE data; directed searches based on the bibliographies of primary articles were also performed. VALUES: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were assigned by the Panel using standard criteria. A "recommendation" was made when level I or II evidence was available and there was consensus as to its meaning. A "suggestion" was made based on level III, IV, or V evidence and there was consensus as to its meaning. Areas of clinical importance were pointed out where guidelines could not be formulated due to insufficient evidence or lack of consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this article. VALIDATION: Seven outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee members, and the ASCO Board of Directors reviewed this document.

Salvage treatment for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiation as initial treatment for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the outcome of salvage treatment for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiation as initial treatment for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. METHODS: An analysis was performed of 42 patients with local only first failure (n = 41) or local-regional only first failure (n = 1) after breast-conserving surgery and radiation treatment had been given for DCIS of the breast. Surgical treatment at the time of local recurrence included mastectomy (n = 37; 88%) or excision (n = 5; 12%). Adjuvant systemic therapy at the time of local recurrence was chemotherapy (n = 3; 7%), tamoxifen (n = 8; 19%), both (n = 1; 2%), none (n = 29; 69%), or unknown (n = 1; 2%). The median interval from the time of initial treatment to local recurrence was 4.8 years (range = 1.0-15.2 yrs). The median follow-up after salvage treatment was 4.5 years (range = 0.2-12.8 yrs). RESULTS: At the time of the local recurrence, 22 patients (52%) had invasive ductal carcinoma, 18 patients (43%) had DCIS, 1 patient (2%) had invasive lobular carcinoma, and 1 patient (2%) had angiosarcoma. After salvage treatment, the rate of overall survival and the rate of cause specific survival for all 42 patients were 92% at both 5- and 8-years after treatment. The rate of freedom from distant metastases was 89% at 5 and 8 years. Favorable prognostic factors after salvage treatment were DCIS as the histology of the local recurrence and mammography only as the method of detection of the local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of salvage treatment in the current study demonstrated that local recurrences were salvaged with high rates of survival and freedom from distant metastases. These results support the use of breast-conserving surgery and radiation for initial management of DCIS of the breast.

MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the usefulness of MR imaging in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1993 and September 1999, 32 women (33 cases) diagnosed with pure invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging examination. One woman was excluded because of lack of follow-up. Correlation was made between the mammographic and sonographic findings, the MR imaging findings, and the final pathology results for the remaining 32 cases. RESULTS: In 18 women who did not undergo excisional biopsy before the MR imaging, MR imaging showed more extensive tumor burden or the detection of the primary lesion that was occult on conventional imaging in seven (38.9%) of 18 women. In nine (50%) of 18 women, MR imaging performed equally as well as mammography and sonography. In one case (5.6%), MR imaging and mammography underestimated disease extent. In another patient (5.6%), MR imaging overestimated tumor burden, although mammography failed to show the cancer. In 14 patients who had excisional biopsy before the MR imaging, residual tumor was shown in eight women (57.1%) with extensive tumor or additional separate foci in five of the eight patients. In two cases (14.3%) that were interpreted as equivocal, residual tumor was shown in both cases on reexcision. In three cases (21.4%), the MR imaging was interpreted as negative, but microscopic tumor was shown around seroma on reexcision. False-positive enhancement was seen in one case (7.1%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging showed more extensive tumor than conventional imaging and affected the clinical management in 16 (50%) of 32 patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

Relationship of family history and outcome after breast conservation therapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between a family history of breast or ovarian cancer and outcome after breast-conserving surgery and radiation in women presenting with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 146 consecutive women with a pathologic diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ as their first diagnosis of any breast cancer were identified; 28 (19%) had a positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer in a first-degree relative, 27 (19%) had a positive family history in a second-degree relative, and 91 (62%) had no family history. Pathologic, clinical, and treatment factors, and clinical outcomes for each family history group were compared. Cosmesis and complications were recorded at each follow-up. Patients were treated between 1978 and 1995, and the median follow-up was 7.1 years. RESULTS: Patients with a positive family history in a first- or second-degree relative each had an 8% incidence of local failure at 10 years, while the negative family history group demonstrated a 16% local failure rate (p = 0.33). Overall survival at 10 years for patients with a positive family history in a first- or second-degree relative was 100% and for those with a negative family history was 91% (p = 0.08). The negative family history group had a higher median age that may account for the difference in overall survival. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was 97%, 100%, and 99%, respectively, at 10 years (p = 0.25). There were no differences in the cosmetic results or complication rates between women with a positive or negative family history. CONCLUSION: We have shown that a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer is not associated with an adverse outcome for women treated with breast conservation therapy for DCIS. Local recurrence, cause-specific survival, overall survival, cosmesis, and complication rates were comparable to that of similarly treated women with negative family histories. Therefore, a positive family history is not a contraindication for breast conservation therapy in women with DCIS.

Analysis of outcomes for high-risk breast cancer based on interval from surgery to postmastectomy radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: The success of adjuvant chemotherapy has prolonged the interval between surgery and postmastectomy radiation therapy for high-risk breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a delay in radiation therapy after mastectomy results in an increased risk of local-regional recurrence of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the University of Pennsylvania database of 221 patients with high-risk breast cancer treated with postmastectomy radiation therapy between 1977 and 1992. The surgery to postmastectomy radiation therapy time interval was 2 months or less in 82 patients (37%), 2.1 to 6 months in 50 patients (23%), and greater than 6 months in 89 patients (40%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 151 patients (68%). The median follow-up was 4.3 years after postmastectomy radiation therapy. RESULTS: Because the three groups showed significant differences for a number of prognostic factors, outcomes are reported in terms of local-regional recurrence only and not survival. The actuarial rate of local-regional recurrence at 8 years was 13% for patients with a surgery to radiation therapy interval of 2 months or less, 4% for those with an interval of 2.1 to 6 months, and 12% for those with an interval of greater than 6 months. A similar analysis performed for 4 months or less versus greater than 4 months between surgery and postmastectomy radiation therapy showed no difference in local-regional recurrence (11% versus 10%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A delay in the institution of postmastectomy radiation therapy in favor of the prolongation of chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients does not adversely affect outcome for local-regional recurrence at 8 years.

Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations.

PURPOSE: Recent laboratory data suggest a role for BRCA1/2 in the cellular response to DNA damage. There is a paucity of clinical data, however, examining the effect of radiotherapy (RT), which causes double-strand breaks, on breast tissue from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Thus the goals of this study were to compare rates of radiation-associated complications, in-breast tumor recurrence, and distant relapse in women with BRCA1/2 mutations treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using RT with rates observed in sporadic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and stage I or II breast cancer treated with BCT were matched 1:3 with 213 women with sporadic breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression models were used to compare matched cohorts for rates of complications and recurrence. RESULTS: Tumors from women in the genetic cohort were associated with high histologic (P =.0004) and nuclear (P =.009) grade and negative estrogen (P=.0001) and progesterone (P=.002) receptors compared with tumors from the sporadic cohort. Using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity scoring, there were no significant differences in acute or chronic morbidity in skin, subcutaneous tissue, lung, or bone. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, relapse-free survival, and rates of tumor control in the treated breast for the patients in the genetic cohort were 86%, 78%, and 98%, respectively, compared with 91%, 80%, and 96%, respectively, for the sporadic cohort (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of increased radiation sensitivity or sequelae in breast tissue heterozygous for a BRCA1/2 germline mutation compared with controls, and rates of tumor control in the breast and survival were comparable between BRCA1/2 carriers and controls at 5 years. Although additional follow-up is needed, these data may help in discussing treatment options in the management of early-stage hereditary breast cancer and should provide reassurance regarding the safety of administering RT to carriers of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.