ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study's purpose was to examine the impact of somatic symptoms and perceived neighborhood environment on depression using a comparison among US-born and non-US-born free clinic patients. METHODS: US-born English speakers (n = 99), non-US-born English speakers (n = 89), and non-US-born Spanish speakers (n = 158) 18 years old or older (N = 346) were surveyed at a free clinic that provides primary care to people without health insurance. Depression, somatic symptoms, and perceived neighborhood environment were measured using standardized instruments. RESULTS: US-born English speakers reported higher levels of depression and a greater number of somatic symptoms than non-US-born Spanish speakers and non-US-born English speakers. Non-US born English speakers reported lower levels of depression and fewer somatic symptoms than Spanish speakers. Somatic symptoms and perceived neighborhood satisfaction were related to depression. CONCLUSIONS: Developing mental health services for patients in a free clinic setting is needed; however, because of limited financial and human resources, providing mental health services in a free clinic setting often is difficult. Community-based health promotion programs as supplements to efforts within clinical settings would be valuable in improving the mental health of free clinic patients. Future studies should implement collaborative pilot programs and evaluate health outcomes.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Residence Characteristics , Social Environment , Somatoform Disorders/ethnology , White People/psychology , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medically Uninsured/ethnology , Medically Uninsured/psychology , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , White People/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Free clinics provide free primary care to the under or uninsured and have been playing an important role in serving the socio-economically disadvantaged. Free clinic patients represent a group of people who experience significant barriers to receiving diabetes prevention and intervention. This study examined diabetes attitudes among free clinic patients and volunteers. English or Spanish speaking patients and volunteers (N = 384), aged 18 years or older completed a self-administered survey. Diabetic patients and volunteers shared similar levels of diabetes attitudes compared to non-diabetic patients. Among patients, ethnicity, education level, diabetes education, and family history affected diabetes attitudes. Among volunteers, diabetes education was an important factor associated with positive diabetes attitudes. Whether the volunteer is a healthcare professional or student was related only to one aspect of diabetes attitudes, seriousness of type 2 diabetes. The results, indicating free clinic diabetic patients and volunteers shared similar levels of diabetes attitudes, were positive for maintaining and developing diabetes education programs at a free clinic. Unfortunately, the average length of volunteering at this free clinic was short and student volunteers likely leave the clinic upon graduation. Future research should examine issues of volunteer retention in free clinics. Diabetes education for patients may need to be diversified according to ethnicity, family history of diabetes, and educational level. Finally, non-healthcare professional volunteers could potentially be involved in diabetes education at a free clinic.