Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a progressive disease associated with rapid clinical worsening and high mortality. Early prediction of mortality and intervention can improve patient outcomes. We aimed to develop a dynamic prognostic model and compare it with the existing models. METHODS: A total of 1402 ACLF patients, enrolled in the APASL-ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) with 90-day follow-up, were analyzed. An ACLF score was developed in a derivation cohort (n = 480) and was validated (n = 922). RESULTS: The overall survival of ACLF patients at 28 days was 51.7%, with a median of 26.3 days. Five baseline variables, total bilirubin, creatinine, serum lactate, INR and hepatic encephalopathy, were found to be independent predictors of mortality, with AUROC in derivation and validation cohorts being 0.80 and 0.78, respectively. AARC-ACLF score (range 5-15) was found to be superior to MELD and CLIF SOFA scores in predicting mortality with an AUROC of 0.80. The point scores were categorized into grades of liver failure (Gr I: 5-7; II: 8-10; and III: 11-15 points) with 28-day cumulative mortalities of 12.7, 44.5 and 85.9%, respectively. The mortality risk could be dynamically calculated as, with each unit increase in AARC-ACLF score above 10, the risk increased by 20%. A score of ≥11 at baseline or persisting in the first week was often seen among nonsurvivors (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AARC-ACLF score is easy to use, dynamic and reliable, and superior to the existing prediction models. It can reliably predict the need for interventions, such as liver transplant, within the first week.

Long-term ciprofloxacin treatment for the prevention of biliary stent blockage: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro experimental and animal studies have shown that quinolones reduce the adherence of bacteria on a polyethylene tube and prevent stent blockage. Our aim was to see whether ciprofloxacin prevents stent blockage in patients with malignant stricture of the biliary tract. METHODS: Patients with inoperable biliary or pancreatic tumor not involving the bifurcation of the common hepatic duct were recruited. They were randomized to receive either endoscopic stenting alone or stenting with prophylactic treatment of ciprofloxacin (200 mg i.v. before stenting, followed by 250 mg orally twice per day). In each follow-up visit, clinical symptoms of cholangitis were documented and blood samples taken for blood counts, serum levels of bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. Stent blockage was defined as clinical symptom(s) of cholangitis with biochemical or radiological evidence of stent dysfunction. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were recruited into the study. Three patients in the stenting group and three in the ciprofloxacin group were excluded after randomization. Eleven patients received stenting alone and five patients receiving ciprofloxacin had previous endoscopic stenting. Thirteen patients (50%) in the ciprofloxacin group and eight patients (31%) in the stenting group died before stent blockage. Ten patients (38%) in each group had stent blockage during the follow-up at 20 wk. The median stent patency was 11.6 wk and 11.9 wk in the ciprofloxacin group and the stenting group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis of stent patency showed no difference between the two groups. Among patients who received endoscopic stenting for the first time, there was a trend favoring ciprofloxacin treatment, but the difference was not significant. The 30-day and 20-wk mortality between the groups were comparable. CONCLUSION: Long-term use of ciprofloxacin does not prevent blockage of polyethylene biliary stents.

Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using polymerase chain reaction assay among patients with hepatic granuloma.

BACKGROUND: In liver tuberculosis, demonstration of acid bacilli by conventional methods remains futile. Since the definitive diagnosis of liver tuberculosis is based on the histologic evidence of granulomatous process with caseation necrosis, seen in only a third of cases, the diagnosis is made retrospectively by response to empirical anti-tuberculous drug therapy. AIMS: Our objective is to establish a polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis affecting the liver using the paraffin-embedded liver biopsy specimens obtained from patients with hepatic granulomas. METHODS: As positive control, patients having either "definitive" (n=8) or "presumptive" (n=9) tuberculosis on the basis of clinical, microbiological, histologic data and their positive response to empirical treatment of anti-tuberculous drugs were used. Patients with hepatic granulomas secondary to schistosomiasis (n=6), sarcoidosis (n=2) and other liver diseases (n=10) were used as negative control. RESULTS: Of those patients who were diagnosed as having "definitive" and "presumptive" liver tuberculosis, positivity by one-step polymerase chain reaction was 100% and 44%, respectively. Using the nested polymerase chain reaction, positivity increased to 78% with "presumptive" liver tuberculosis. In contrast, the polymerase chain reaction assays were negative among all patients with hepatic granuloma due to non-tuberculous-in-origin and other liver diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The overall positivity of this polymerase chain reaction assay (88%) compares favorably with that of other conventional methods (12%). Thus, this polymerase chain reaction assay may be a reliable diagnostic tool for liver tuberculosis in a patient population in which the prevalence of diseases associated with hepatic granuloma is common.

An open trial on short-term omeprazole therapy for gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, is a potent and long-acting gastric acid reducing agent. To assess its short-term efficacy and safety, 27 gastric ulcers (GU) and 40 duodenal ulcers (DU) in 64 patients were treated with 20 mg. Omeprazole was given once daily. At 2 weeks, the healing rate for gastric ulcers was 66% (18/27) and for duodenal ulcers, 78% (31/40). At 4 weeks, the healing rate was 85% and 95% for GU and DU, respectively. Pain relief was achieved after 2 weeks in 62% with GU and 61% in DU. There were no significant side effects noted during the treatment course. Omeprazole is effective and safe in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers: 1:10000 adrenalin injection vs. 1:10000 adrenalin +1% aethoxysclerol injection vs. heater probe.

To evaluate the efficacy of three endoscopic methods which utilize different mechanisms of hemostasis to control bleeding peptic ulcers, we performed a prospective randomized study in 83 patients. Thirty-two patients were treated with 1:10000 adrenalin (Group I), 29 patients with 1:10000 adrenalin +1% aethoxysclerol (Group II), and 22 patients with the heater probe (Group III). Gastric ulcers were the source of bleeding in 14, 15 and 12 patients while duodenal ulcers were the source in 16, 13 and 10 patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively. Two stomal ulcers were noted in Group I and 1 in Group II. Two spurters were treated in Group I and 4 in Group II, while 22, 13 and 10 oozers were treated in Groups I, II and III, respectively. Definitive hemostasis was achieved in 94%, 100% and 95% in Groups I, II and III, respectively while the rebleeding rate was 6.25%, 6.9% and 9% respectively. 1:10000 adrenalin injection alone or when combined with subsequent instillation of a sclerosing agent and heater probe application have comparable efficacy in the endoscopic control of bleeding peptic ulcers.