Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Bull Cancer ; 109(12): 1269-1276, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870953

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tumour deposits (TD) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) are key anatomopathology prognostic criteria in rectal cancer. According to the 2018 ESGAR recommendations, they should be included in every MRI report. The present study aimed at identifying pelvic MRI survival prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal cancers before neo-adjuvant treatment, with a focus on EMVI and TD (mrEMVI and mrTD). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, we conducted a retrospective study about 69 patients who underwent a pre-operative radiotherapy for a non-metastatic rectal cancer. All MR images were acquired on machines with a 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla field strength and were interpreted in compliance with the 2018 ESGAR recommendations. RESULTS: Out of the 27 patients who were mrEMVI+ (39.1%), MRF was involved in 77.7% of the cases vs. 33.3% for the mrEMVI- tumours. Fifteen (55.5%) out of the 27 mrEMVI+ tumours were mrTD+. This represents 21.7% of our population. mrEMVI/mrTD+ tumours were more RCT resistant, their downstaging happened in 6.7% of cases. In case of tumour downstaging, DFS increased significantly (P=0.02) unlike OS (P=0.2). DISCUSSION: The present study supports the fact that both mrEMVI and mrTD status are important pelvic MRI prognostic factors. Future studies could focus on relating mrTD tumours status to pathological results to define if post-RCT downstaging of TD has an impact on OS.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Second Primary , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Extranodal Extension , Workflow , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Invasiveness
2.
Br J Radiol ; 93(1109): 20190147, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971824

ABSTRACT

Concerns have been raised about potential toxic interactions when colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and chemoradiation are concurrently performed. In 2006, the ASCO guidelines advised against their concomitant use. Nevertheless, with the development of modern radiotherapy techniques and supportive care, the therapeutic index of combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and CSFs is worth reassessing. Recent clinical trials testing chemoradiation in lung cancer let investigators free to decide the use of concomitant CSFs or not. No abnormal infield event was reported after the use of modern radiotherapy techniques and concomitant chemotherapy regimens. These elements call for further investigation to set new recommendations in favour of the association of chemoradiation and CSFs. Moreover, radiotherapy could induce anticancer systemic effects mediated by the immune system in vitro and in vivo. With combined CSFs, this effect was reinforced in preclinical and clinical trials introducing innovative radioimmunotherapy models. So far, the association of radiation with CSFs has not been combined with immunotherapy. However, it might play a major role in triggering an immune response against cancer cells, leading to abscopal effects. The present article reassesses the therapeutic index of the combination CSFs-chemoradiation through an updated review on its safety and efficacy. It also provides a special focus on radioimmunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Animals , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Mice , Radioimmunotherapy/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy
3.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 19(6): 1671-1675, 2018 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29938464

ABSTRACT

Background: Due to progress in medical care, the number of survivors from cancer has increased significantly during recent years and this raises the question of the quality of life (QoL), especially of the many women treated for a breast cancer. This paper focuses on correlations of QoL with anxiety and depression on the one hand and with socio demographic, anatomo-clinical and therapeutic parameters on the other. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, seventy patients were enrolled and filled in two auto-questionnaires, both in validated Arabic versions: The SF-36 for assessment of QoL and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-S) for evaluation of anxiety and depression. The statistical approaches used to determine predictive factors were bivariate correlations to determine relationships between quantitative variables, and T-tests and one-way Anova to analyze links between qualitative and quantitative variables. Results: The QoL of patients was altered with an SF-36 mean total score of 54.0 ± 22.7, and the alteration affects the different aspects. The mean scores for anxiety and depression in patients were 6.91 ± 4.72 and 6.24 ± 3.88, respectively. The results of this study suggested an association between the QoL and chemotherapy (p= 0.014) and its adverse effects (p=0.01), as well as anxiety (p= 0.0001) and depressive symptoms (p= 0.0001). Socio-demographic factors, the stage of the cancer, and surgery, radiotherapy or hormone therapy did not appear to have significant effects. Conclusion: The management of breast cancer patients needs a collaborative approach between oncologists, gynecologists, psychologist and psychiatrists.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prevalence , Prognosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survivors , Tunisia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...