Assessment of Tolerability, Response and Complications of Concurrent Chemoradiation With Capecitabine and Cisplatin in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer; A Single Arm Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, tolerance and efficacy of cisplatin+capecitabine as a proposed combination in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: MIBC patients with stage T2-T4aN0M0 participated in this single-arm clinical trial. After maximal TURBT, 66Gy/33 daily fractions of radiation were administered with concurrent chemotherapy of cisplatin (35 mg/m2) and capecitabine (625 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was treatment tolerability, defined as receiving capecitabine+cisplatin combination for at least 5 weeks during radiation therapy. The secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) and acute toxicity rates. RESULTS: This study included 19 MIBC patients from 2018 to 2019. Eighteen patients (94.7%, 95%CI: 75.4-99.0) completed the planned treatment course. Only one patient (5.26%, 95%CI: 0.9-24.6) discontinued the treatment due to grade-3 GI toxicity. Among those who completed the treatment, CR was seen in 12 patients (66.7%, 95% CI = 44.4-88.9) with no grade ≥ 3 toxicities. The most common grade-2 side effects during therapy were renal complications (57.9%), and the only grade-2 complication after therapy was urinary-related (11.1%). The median follow-up was 31 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 31 months. The 2-year OS was 78% (95% CI 58.4-97.6), Cystectomy-free survival was 61% (95% CI: 37.5-84.5), and the median OS after recurrence was 13 months. Distant metastases were the first type of recurrence in most patients with a recurrence, which occurred in 7 (36.8%) patients. Median metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 30 months, and 2-year MFS was 66% (95% CI:45-87). CONCLUSION: The promising tolerability rate seen with concurrent cisplatin+capecitabine in this study was comparable to the available literature. Thus, this combination concurrently with radiation warrants further studies in the context of chemoradiotherapy of MIBC.

Clinical potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a rapidly evolving strategy.

Programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade therapy has become a game-changing therapeutic approach revolutionizing the treatment setting of human malignancies, such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite the remarkable clinical activity of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, only a small portion of patients exhibit a positive response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, and the primary or acquired resistance might ultimately favor cancer development in patients with clinical responses. In light of this, recent reports have signified that the addition of other therapeutic modalities to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy might improve clinical responses in advanced RCC patients. Until, combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy plus cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor (ipilimumab) or various vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) inhibitors axitinib, such as axitinib and cabozantinib, has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first-line treatment for metastatic RCC. In the present review, we have focused on the therapeutic benefits of the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy as a single agent or in combination with other conventional or innovative targeted therapies in RCC patients. We also offer a glimpse into the well-determined prognostic factor associated with the clinical response of RCC patients to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.