Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states.

Cytosine methylation is a repressive, epigenetically propagated DNA modification. Although patterns of DNA methylation seem tightly regulated in mammals, it is unclear how these are specified and to what extent this process entails genetic or epigenetic regulation. To dissect the role of the underlying DNA sequence, we sequentially inserted over 50 different DNA elements into the same genomic locus in mouse stem cells. Promoter sequences of approximately 1,000 bp autonomously recapitulated correct DNA methylation in pluripotent cells. Moreover, they supported proper de novo methylation during differentiation. Truncation analysis revealed that this regulatory potential is contained within small methylation-determining regions (MDRs). MDRs can mediate both hypomethylation and de novo methylation in cis, and their activity depends on developmental state, motifs for DNA-binding factors and a critical CpG density. These results demonstrate that proximal sequence elements are both necessary and sufficient for regulating DNA methylation and reveal basic constraints of this regulation.

Promoter analysis of palindromic transcription units in the ribosomal DNA circle of Entamoeba histolytica.

rRNA genes of Entamoeba histolytica are organized as palindromic ribosomal DNA (rDNA) units (I and II) in a 24.5-kb circle. Although the two rDNAs are identical in sequence, their upstream spacers are completely different. Since the intergenic sequences (IGS) of all rDNA copies in other organisms are conserved and contain transcription regulatory sequences, the lack of sequence conservation in the IGS prompted the question of whether both rDNAs are indeed transcriptionally active. We mapped the transcriptional start points (tsp's) and promoters of the two rDNAs. A 51-bp sequence immediately upstream of the tsp's was highly conserved in both units. In addition, both units had an A+T-rich stretch upstream of the 51-bp core. Analysis of reporter gene transcription showed promoter activity to reside in the regions from positions -86 to +123 (rDNA I) and positions -101 to +140 (rDNA II). The promoter-containing fragments from both units could bind and compete with each other for protein(s) from nuclear extracts. Protein binding was especially dependent on the A+T-rich region upstream of the 51-bp core (positions -53 to -68). The requirement of >80 bp downstream of the tsp was striking. Although this sequence was not conserved in the two units, it could potentially fold into very long stem-loops. Both rDNAs transcribed with comparable efficiency, as measured by nuclear runon. Thus, both rDNAs share very similar organization of promoter sequences, and in exponential culture both rDNAs are transcribed. It remains to be seen whether the different IGS affect the regulation of the two units under adverse conditions.

DNA-bound Bas1 recruits Pho2 to activate ADE genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Expression of the genes in the ADE regulon of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is repressed by the presence of purine bases in the extracellular medium and derepressed when cells are grown in the absence of purines. Derepression requires the transcriptional activators Bas1 and Pho2, as well as the biosynthetic intermediates 5'-phosphoribosyl-4-succinocarboxamide-5-aminoimidazole (SAICAR) and 5'-phosphoribosyl-4-carboxamide- 5-aminoimidazole (AICAR). In this study, we investigated if nuclear localization and binding to promoter DNA by the activators are regulated by purines. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we found that Bas1 is localized to the nucleus under both repressing and derepressing conditions. Importantly, we detected Bas1 bound to promoter DNA under both conditions using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays at several ADE promoters (ADE1, ADE2, ADE4, and ADE5,7) and HIS4. We analyzed the binding of Bas1 to wild-type and mutant sequences of the ADE5,7 promoters in vivo, and found that Bas1 binds independently to each of its two binding sites. Pho2 was not required for the association of Bas1 with chromosomal DNA, but it was required for an increase in Bas1-immunoprecipitated DNA. The presence of Pho2 at promoters was dependent on Bas1 and occurred only under derepressing conditions when the ADE genes are transcribed at elevated levels. We propose a model for regulation of the ADE genes in which DNA-bound Bas1 is inactive due to masking of its activation domain and Pho2 binds poorly to promoters when cells have sufficient purine nucleotides. Upon limitation for purines, the SAICAR/AICAR regulatory signal is transmitted to the nucleus to increase Bas1 and Pho2 interaction, recruiting Pho2 to promoters and freeing the activation domains for transactivation.