Development of the European Laparoscopic Intermediate Urological Skills LUSs2 Curriculum: A Delphi Consensus from the European School of Urology.

Background and objective: While programmes such as the European Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills have made strides in foundational training, a significant gap exists for intermediate and advanced laparoscopy education. Our objective is to develop and validate the European laparoscopic intermediate urological skills (LUSs2) curriculum, which will establish uniformity in the training of urological laparoscopic procedures and facilitate proficiency among practitioners. Methods: The study combines a literature review, cognitive task analysis development by a steering group, and a two-round Delphi survey involving international experts in urological laparoscopy. Consensus was defined as agreement of ≥70% among experts. The survey included statements on various laparoscopic procedures, assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree). Key findings and limitations: The Delphi process achieved consensus on 85% (235/275) of statements, indicating a strong agreement on the curriculum's content. Areas covered include renal hilum dissection, major vessel injury management, enucleation and renorrhaphy, vesicourethral anastomosis, and pyeloplasty. Limitations include the nonsystematic nature of the literature review and potential biases inherent in expert-based consensus methods. Conclusions and clinical implications: The LUSs2 curriculum significantly advances the standardised training of laparoscopic urological skills. It offers a detailed, consensus-validated framework that addresses the need for uniformity in surgical education and aims to enhance surgical proficiency and patient care. Patient summary: This study presents the development of a new standardised training curriculum for urological laparoscopic surgery. We intend this curriculum to improve the quality of surgical training and ensure high-quality patient care.

Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis.

Objective: An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles for the most commonly used antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) across different age and gender subpopulations. By doing so, we provide valuable information for doctors managing prophylactic and empiric therapeutic treatments. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed over 650,000 urine cultures collected in the Microbiology Department of a referral university hospital in Southern England from January 2014 to December 2022. A population-based analysis for subgroups was performed to rule out differences in AMR patterns. Our report was recorded at UHS as an internal audit (UHS7670). Results: 146,867 cultures were found positive for GNB growth. Nitrofurantoin showed the best sensitivity patterns for all age subgroups (0.93% for patients aged ≤ 18; 1.22% for patients aged 19-40; 2.17% for patients aged 40-60; and 3.48% for patients aged > 60), regardless of gender (male: 6.37%, female: 2.59%). Ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim showed a poor AMR profile for all age groups (>55% and >28%, respectively) and genders (>60% and >28%, respectively). All the other tested antibiotics (cefalexin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin) showed an overall good profile for GNB resistance across all subgroups. For all antibiotics except trimethoprim, the risk of developing AMR was significantly higher in the male population. We also found that people aged over 60 had a higher risk of AMR compared to the other age groups for all antibiotics, with the exception of cefotaxime and co-amoxiclav. Conclusions: With an overall rise in resistance patterns for GNB-related UTIs, certain antibiotics-particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-now exhibit very poor sensitivity profiles. However, antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and gentamicin remain excellent options for empirically treating UTIs. It is important to note that AMR can vary across different populations, with higher resistance often found in elderly and male patients. Clinicians must stay informed about current guidelines and research to provide the best treatment options while minimizing the risk of further AMR development.

ChatGPT as a Clinical Decision Maker for Urolithiasis: Compliance with the Current European Association of Urology Guidelines.

Background and objective: Generative artificial intelligence models are among the most promising and widely used tools used in health care. This review investigates GPT-4 answers to decision-making questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis across several clinical settings and their correspondence to the current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. Methods: In March 2024, the GPT-4 model was asked 11 questions, containing a brief description of a patient with urolithiasis. All questions were grouped according to urolithiasis care step: diagnosis, urgent care, scheduled intervention, and metaphylaxis. When responses were received, compliance with the current EAU guidelines was assessed by experienced urologists. Key findings and limitations: Although all responses were provided with information that corresponded to EAU guidelines, six of the 11 answers were associated with missed guideline-provided parts, and incorrect data were given in eight of the 11 answers. GPT-4 is relatively safe in the initial diagnostic flow of patients suspected of having stones within the urinary tract and during treatment planning; however, its understanding of all the nuances of metaphylaxis leaves much to be desired and is far from the dogma given in the EAU guidelines. Moreover, GPT-4 knowledge of strategy and algorithm is not always aligned with the EAU guidelines. Conclusions and clinical implications: Despite the fact that from the perspective of patients with urolithiasis, GPT-4 is capable of answering their questions well, the specificity of questions from urologists is labor intensive for its current version, and necessitates the ability to interpret it correctly and further attempts to improve it. While some aspects of diagnostics are more accurate, these struggle with surgical planning and algorithms in line with the EAU guidelines. Patient summary: The generative artificial intelligence (AI) model GPT-4 is capable of answering urology-related questions, but lacks detailed responses. Although some aspects of the diagnostics are accurate, knowledge of surgical planning is not in line with the European Association of Urology guidelines. Future improvements should focus on efforts to enhance the accuracy, reliability, and clinical relevance of AI tools in urology.

Operative outcomes 24 hours after retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal calculi using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath. A prospective global multicenter study by the European Association of Urology Section on Urolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Suction techniques showed potential to improve outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). We assessed the 24-hour stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after RIRS using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS-UAS). METHODS: Sixteen centers prospectively contributed to data (August 2023-October 2023). Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, single renal stone, pre and 24-hour post-RIRS CT scan. Exclusion criteria were: ureteral stone, anomalous kidney, multiple stones. SFR was divided into: 1) grade A - no fragments; 2) grade B - fragments ≤2 mm; 3) grade C - fragments 2.1-4 mm; and 4) grade D - fragments >4 mm. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was performed to assess factors associated with the odds of having grade A stone-free status. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range), absolute numbers and frequencies, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients with a median age of 52 years (40-61) were enrolled. 61.3% were males. Median stone volume was 1165 mm3 (656-1936). Median operative time was 48.5 (36.25-71.75) min. Transient fever (37°C-37.5°C) occurred in 10 (7%) patients. No sepsis case occurred. 96.5% of patients were stone-free (Grade A+B). Grade A SFR was 52.8%. All patients were discharged within 48 hours. Bone window (OR 3.156 95% CI 1.177-9.130, P=0.027) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of 100% SFR, while stone volume (OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.999-1.000, P=0.007) was significantly associated with lower odds. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging and clinical evidence demonstrate excellent perioperative outcomes just 24 hours post RIRS with FANS-UAS. The technique demonstrates a good safety profile, ability for immediate high SFR, and a low rate of infective complications.

Association and risk of metabolic syndrome and kidney stone disease: outcomes from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has emerged as a potential contributor to the development of kidney stone disease (KSD). This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the literature, and meta-analysis of the association between MetS and KSD. RECENT FINDINGS: Systematic review revealed Fifteen articles (433 201 patients) were eligible for analysis. Meta-analysis of 11 studies identified a statistically significant association between MetS and KSD with unadjusted odds ratio of 2.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96-2.08, P < 0.001], and pooled adjusted odds ratio of 1.22 [95% CI 1.09-1.37, P < 0.001]. Of the different MetS traits, hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance were the most significantly associated with KSD. SUMMARY: This study confirms a significant association between MetS and KSD. Despite variations in MetS definitions across different studies analysed, consistent associations were observed across studies. This may have clinical implications in that guidelines do not currently recommend routine MetS screening in KSD patients.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guidelines on the management of pediatric urolithiasis.

The aim of this study was to construct the sixth in a series of guidelines on the treatment of urolithiasis by the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) that by providing a clinical framework for the management of pediatric patients with urolithiasis based on the best available published literature. All recommendations were summarized following a systematic review and assessment of literature in the PubMed database from January 1952 to December 2023. Each generated recommendation was graded using a modified GRADE methodology. Recommendations are agreed upon by Panel Members following review and discussion of the evidence. Guideline recommendations were developed that addressed the following topics: etiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and symptoms, diagnosis, conservative management, surgical interventions, prevention, and follow-up. Similarities in the treatment of primary stone episodes between children and adults, incorporating conservative management and advancements in technology for less invasive stone removal, are evident. Additionally, preventive strategies aiming to reduce recurrence rates, such as ensuring sufficient fluid intake, establishing well-planned dietary adjustments, and selective use pharmacologic therapies will also result in highly successful outcomes in pediatric stone patients. Depending on the severity of metabolic disorders and also anatomical abnormalities, a careful and close follow-up program should inevitably be planned in each pediatric patient to limit the risk of future recurrence rates.

ChatGPT in Clinical Medicine, Urology and Academia: A Review.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the utilisation of ChatGPT in the fields of clinical medicine, urology, and academic medicine, while also addressing the associated ethical challenges and potential risks. METHODS: This narrative review conducted an extensive search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases, covering the period from January 2022 to January 2024. The search phrases employed were "urologic surgery" in conjunction with "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "neural network", "ChatGPT", "urology", and "medicine". The initial studies were chosen from the screened research to examine the possible interaction between those entities. Research utilising animal models was excluded. RESULTS: ChatGPT has demonstrated its usefulness in clinical settings by producing precise clinical correspondence, discharge summaries, and medical records, thereby assisting in these laborious tasks, especially with the latest iterations of ChatGPT. Furthermore, patients can access essential medical information by inquiring with ChatGPT. Nevertheless, there are multiple concerns regarding the correctness of the system, including allegations of falsified data and references. These issues emphasise the importance of having a doctor oversee the final result to guarantee patient safety. ChatGPT shows potential in academic medicine for generating drafts and organising datasets. However, the presence of guidelines and plagiarism-detection technologies is necessary to mitigate the risks of plagiarism and the use of faked data when using it for academic purposes. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT should be utilised as a supplementary tool by urologists and academicians. However, it is now advisable to have human oversight to guarantee patient safety, uphold academic integrity, and maintain transparency.

Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, bilateral urolithiasis treatment involved staged interventions due to safety concerns. Recent studies have shown that same-sitting bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) is effective, with acceptable complication rates. However, there's no clear data on the optimum laser for the procedure. This study aimed to assess outcomes of SSB-RIRS comparing thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in a multicenter real-world practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing SSB-RIRS from January 2015 to June 2022 across 21 centers worldwide. Three months perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded, focusing on complications and stone-free rates (SFR). RESULTS: A total of 733 patients were included, with 415 in group 1 (Ho:YAG) and 318 in group 2 (TFL). Both groups have similar demographic and stone characteristics. Group 1 had more incidence of symptomatic pain or hematuria (26.5% vs. 10.4%). Operation and lasing times were comparable. The use of baskets was higher in group 1 (47.2% vs. 18.9%, p<0.001). Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar. Group 2 had a higher overall SFR. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that age, presence of stone at the lower pole, and stone diameter were associated with lower odds of being stone-free bilaterally, while TFL was associated with higher odds. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that urologists use both lasers equally for SSB-RIRS. Reintervention rates are low, safety profiles are comparable, and single-stage bilateral SFR may be better in certain cases. Bilateral lower pole and large-volume stones have higher chances of residual fragments.

Transurethral resection and other minimally invasive treatment options for BPH: would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Results from EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) decision-making survey among urologists.

Introduction: With the introduction of novel treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), decision making regarding surgical management has become ever more complex. Factors such as clinical exposure, equipment availability, patient characteristics and hospital setting may affect what treatment is offered and an informed patient choice. The aim of this study was to investigate how urologists help patients make decisions regarding BPH management and whether their practice would differ if they were the patient themselves. Material and methods: A 52-question survey presenting hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to European urologists and trainees/residents online and in person. In each scenario, regarding treatment options for BPH, the participant considered themselves firstly as the treating clinician and secondly as the patient themselves. Details regarding the participants' clinical experience, awareness of treatment options and exposure to these options were obtained. Results: There were 139 participants; 69.8% of whom were consultants, with 82.1% of participants having practiced urology for more than 5 years. A total of 59.7% of urologists consider themselves BPH specialists. Furthermore, 93.5% of those surveyed had performed transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), whilst procedures performed the least by participants were minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options. Only 17.3% had seen and 1.4% had performed all of the treatment options. When considering themselves as a patient within standard practice, there was a preference for HoLEP amongst participants. Conclusions: The majority of urologists surveyed had minimal experience to newer BPH techniques and MIST, suggesting that more exposure is required. A higher rate of HoLEP was chosen as a treatment option for urologists themselves as a patient than what they would choose as an option for their patients.

Does Silodosin Improve Primary Ureteroscopy Access and Outcomes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Ureteroscopy (URS) is a widely utilized procedure for the management of urinary stones, though failed access due to ureteral orifice tightness or spasms can be a potential outcome. Silodosin, an alpha-1A adrenergic receptor antagonist, has shown promise in recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in improving URS outcomes by relaxing ureteral smooth muscle. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine whether preoperative administration of silodosin enhances ureteroscopy outcomes, including ureteral access rates, operative time, complication rates, and stone-free rates. Methods: After PROSPERO registration, a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for RCTs comparing silodosin with placebo or no medication before URS. Data extraction and bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Statistical analysis was undertaken by Review Manager V5.4, employing random-effects models for heterogeneous variables. Results: Eight RCTs with a total of 892 patients (416 in the silodosin group and 476 in the control group) met the inclusion criteria. Silodosin significantly reduced operative time by 15.74 minutes (p < 0.00001). The access rate was higher in the silodosin group (96.9%) compared with the control group (87.2%)(p = 0.0004). Total complication rates were lower in the silodosin group (14.39% vs 27.47%, p < 0.00001), as were moderate to significant complications (5.0% vs 11.7%, p = 0.003). Stone-free rates were also higher in the silodosin group (92.16% vs 81.5%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Preoperative administration of silodosin significantly improves URS outcomes by reducing operative time, increasing access rates, decreasing complication rates, and enhancing stone-free rates. These findings support the integration of silodosin into clinical practice guidelines for URS, potentially improving procedural efficiency and patient outcomes.

Does concordance between preoperatively measured prostate volume and enucleated weight predict outcomes in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate? Results from the REAP database.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine if preoperative prostate volume-enucleated weight concordance predicts short-term anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) outcomes using the REAP international database. METHODS: 649 patients with data on both preoperative ultrasound-derived prostate volume and enucleated specimen weight were analyzed. Linear regression was used to investigate the effect of volume-weight concordance on postoperative outcomes. Model residuals were used to divide the cohort into 3 centiles: (1) less-than-expected enucleated specimen weight; (2) appropriate concordance between prostate volume and specimen weight; (3) more-than-expected specimen weight. Outcomes were also analyzed with only enucleated weight as a predictor (comparing ≤ 80 g and > 80 g). RESULTS: There was a trend towards more-than-expected enucleated specimen weight with increased age (p = 0.006). There was an increasing trend of operation time (p = 0.012) and enucleation time (p = 0.015) as specimen weight increased, and a decreasing trend of postoperative acute urinary retention (p = 0.005). Laser type, enucleation method, and early apical release were similar. In correlation analysis, greater-than-expected prostate weight was associated with greater Qmax improvement at 3 months. Prostate weight alone did not appear to be a significant predictor of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: If enucleated specimen weight is more than expected according to preoperative ultrasound volume measurement, greater Qmax improvement and less postoperative acute urinary retention is expected. Although precision may be limited by ultrasound approximation and inexact specimen weight measurements, these shortcomings are similar in real-world clinical practice. Overall, preoperative prostate volume and actual enucleated specimen weight should be interpreted in the context of each other to predict clinical outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness and health economics for ureteral and kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To systematically review costs associated with endourological procedures (ureteroscopy, URS; shockwave lithotripsy, SWL; and percutaneous nephrolithotomy, PCNL) for kidney stone disease (KSD), providing an overview of cost-effectiveness and health economics strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review of the literature was performed, retrieving 83 English-written full-text studies for inclusion. Papers were labelled according to the respective area of interest: 'costs of different procedures: SWL, URS, PCNL', 'costs of endourological devices and new technologies: reusable and disposable scopes, lasers, other devices', 'costs of KSD treatment in the emergency setting: emergency stenting versus primary URS'. Forty-three papers reported on associated cost for different procedures, revealing URS to be the most cost-effective. PCNL follows with higher hospitalization costs, while SWL appears to be least cost effective due to high need of additional procedures. The role of disposable and reusable scope is investigated by 15 articles, while other 16 reported on the role of different lasers, devices and techniques. The last nine studies included discussed the best and more cost-effective treatment for acute stone presentation, with promising results for primary URS versus emergency stenting and delayed URS. SUMMARY: Cost-effective and cost-conscious intervention is equally imperative to consider whilst weighing in clinical efficacy for endourological procedures. When a decision-making choice of SWL, URS or PCNL is offered to a patient, the outcomes must be balanced with a deeper understanding of additional cost burden of retreatment, reimbursement, repeated interventions, and recurrence. In todays' practice, investing in endourological devices for KSD management must consider carefully the direct and hidden costs of using reusable and disposable technology. Cost control measures should not in any way compromise the quality of life or safety of the patient.

Mitigating infections in implantable urological continence devices: risks, challenges, solutions, and future innovations. A comprehensive literature review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stress urinary incontinence is a growing issue in ageing men, often following treatment for prostate cancer or bladder outflow obstruction. While implantable urological devices offer relief, infections are a significant concern. These infections can lead to device removal, negating the benefits and impacting patient outcomes. This review explores the risks and factors contributing to these infections and existing strategies to minimize them. These strategies encompass a multifaceted approach that considers patient-specific issues, environmental issues, device design and surgical techniques. However, despite these interventions, there is still a pressing need for further advancements in device infection prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Faster diagnostics, such as Raman spectroscopy, could enable early detection of infections. Additionally, biocompatible adjuncts like ultrasound-responsive microbubbles hold promise for enhanced drug delivery and biofilm disruption, particularly important as antibiotic resistance rises worldwide. SUMMARY: By combining advancements in diagnostics, device design, and patient-specific surgical techniques, we can create a future where implantable urological devices offer men a significant improvement in quality of life with minimal infection risk.

Foley catheter after ureteroscopy and JJ stent placement: a randomised prospective European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis-Young Academic Urologists (EULIS-YAU) endourology study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of inserting a Foley catheter after ureteroscopy (URS) and JJ stent placement on pain scores, voiding patterns, biochemical parameters and postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomised clinical trial (1:1) with adult patients following unilateral URS + JJ stent placement was planned. In Group A, no Foley catheter was placed, in Group B, a Foley catheter was placed following URS + JJ stent placement. The primary objective was to evaluate effect of placing a Foley catheter on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) score and postoperative biochemical parameters. The secondary objective was to evaluate postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included (56/group). A ureteric access sheath was used in each patient. Patients had similar demographic and surgical parameters. The pre- and postoperative biochemical analyses including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and creatinine levels were similar between the two groups. The IPSS were similar between the two groups. All the subdomains of the USSQ were similar between two groups except Total Body Pain score, which was lower in Group B. The visual analogue scale scores were similar. Complications were all Clavien-Dindo Grade I and II, and the complication rate was 5.4% and 8.9% in Group A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Placing a Foley catheter following URS + JJ stent placement did not show significant effects on postoperative biochemical parameters and voiding symptoms. However, a Foley catheter lowered the Total Body Pain score on the USSQ without having significant effects on VAS scores. The practice of placing a Foley catheter following URS and JJ stent placement should be based on surgeon's preference keeping in mind the potential positive effect on pain scores.

Outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation using a 60 W MOSES laser: a 3-year prospective study from a University Teaching Hospital.

Introduction: Modulated optics enhancement system (MOSES) holmium lasers use "pulse modulation" to increase the efficacy of laser lithotripsy. As the clinical evidence on the efficacy of 60 W holmium laser with MOSES technology is scarce, we analyzed the outcomes of patients treated with this laser at our institution. Methods: A total of 96 consecutive patients with urinary stones (72 renal stones and 24 ureteral stones) were treated with the 60 W MOSES laser from 2019 until 2022 and were included in our analysis. Patient data and outcomes were prospectively collected, and analysis was performed regarding patient demographics, stone parameters, as well as stone-free rate, operating time, length of stay, and perioperative and postoperative complications. Results: With a median age of 55 (IQR: 35-69.25) years, the male:female ratio was 53:43. The median stone size was 12 mm (IQR: 7-19), with a mean number of urinary stones of 1.82 (SD ± 1.4). While 36 (35%) patients were pre-stented, a ureteral access sheath was inserted in 36 (37.5%) patients. The median operative time was 44 min (IQR: 22.5-59.5), and 63 (65.5%) patients received postoperative stenting. Perioperative complications (all Clavien ⩽ II complications) were observed in 5 (5.2%) patients (four urinary tract infections and one acute urinary retention), and after the first procedure, 90 (93.8%) patients were stone-free. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day (IQR: 1-1). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the 60 W MOSES laser was safe and efficient for the treatment of urinary stones with high stone-free rates and a small risk of minor complications. More studies with larger cohorts are necessary in the future to confirm our results.

Comparison of ureteoroscopy and laser stone fragmentation between Holmium: YAG laser with MOSES versus non-MOSES technology: a prospective single-center propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings.

Background: In vitro studies have shown that the holmium Modulated Optics Enhancement Systems (MOSES) technology can lead to an increase in the efficacy of lithotripsy and a reduction of retropulsion, but clinical evidence comparing it to non-MOSES technology is still scarce. We did a comparison of ureteoroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) between Holmium:YAG laser with MOSES versus non-MOSES technologies. Methods: Patient data and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed regarding patient demographics, stone parameters, and clinical outcomes. Patients undergoing URSL with standard holmium laser without MOSES technology (Group 1) were compared to holmium laser with MOSES (Group 2) using the same clinical laser settings (0.4-1 J, 20-40 Hz) with dusting and pop-dusting technique. The independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test were used, with a p-value of < 0.05 as significant. Given the different sizes of the cohorts, we performed a propensity score 1:1 matched analysis. Results: A total of 206 patients (1:1 matched) with a male:female ratio of 94:112 and a median age of 56 (range: 39-68) years were analyzed. Groups 1 and 2 were matched for ureteric stones (27.7% and 22.3%, p = 0.42), pre-stenting (37% and 35%, p = 0.66), the mean number of stones (1.76 ± 1.3) and (1.82 ± 1.4, p = 0.73), and ureteral access sheath use (37% and 35%, p = 0.77) respectively.While there was no significant statistical difference in clinical outcomes, the stone size was slightly larger in Group 2, 14.8 ± 10.8 mm vs 11.7 ± 8.0 mm, for a lower operative time 42.7 ± 30.6 min versus 48.5 ± 25 min, lower perioperative complication rates 3.9% versus 4.9% and a higher stone-free rate 90.3% versus 87.4%. Conclusion: While the use of MOSES technology was slightly beneficial for the treatment of stones in terms of clinical outcomes, this was not statistically significant. As this debate continues, there is a need for high-quality randomized studies to show if there is a true difference in these outcomes.

We compare the outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL), using Holmium:YAG laser with MOSES vs Non-MOSES technology: It is a prospective single-centre propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings It is a single-centre propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings. While the use of MOSES technology was slightly beneficial for treatment of stones in terms of clinical outcomes, this was not statistically significant. As this debate continues, there is a need for high quality randomized studies to show if there is a true difference in these outcomes.

Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.

Social media (SoMe) is now a core part of modern-day life with increased use among both patients and urologists. The interplay of SoMe between these two parties is complex. From a patient perspective, SoMe platforms can serve as educational tools as well as communication portals to support networks and patient communities. However, studies report the educational value of content online is often poor and may contain misinformation. For urologists, SoMe can lead to research collaborations, networking and educational content but areas of concern include the potential negative impact SoMe can have on mental health and sharing of patient images without appropriate consent. This review serves to provide an overview of the interaction between SoMe and urology practice and provide practical guidance to navigating it.

Systemic vs. in-irrigation tranexamic acid in percutaneous nephrolithotomy A systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large renal stones. One potentially significant complication of PCNL is blood loss, which can result in transfusion requirement and poorer stone-free outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising intervention, administered systemically (TXA-S) or as part of irrigation fluid (TXA-I) in endourology. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze existing evidence regarding the applications of TXA in PCNL through a Bayesian network meta-analysis, offering insights into its efficacy and comparative effectiveness. METHODS: In February 2022, a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD 42021270593) was performed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on TXA as either systemic therapy or in irrigation fluid. Studies in languages other than English and Spanish were not considered. A Bayesian network was built using results from identified studies to create models that were later run through Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling through 200 000 iterations. RESULTS: Eight RCTs compared TXA-S vs. placebo, one TXA-I vs. placebo, and one TXA-I vs. TXA-S. TXA-I had lower risk of transfusion (relative risk [RR] 0.63 [0.47,0.84], SUCRA 0.950) than TXA-S (RR 0.79 [0.65,0.95], SUCRA 0.545). TXA-I had a lower risk of complications (RR 0.38 [0.21,0.67], SUCRA=0.957) compared to TXA-S (RR 0.55 [0.39, 0.78], SUCRA 0.539). TXA-I had a lower postoperative decrease in hemoglobin (mean difference [MD] -1.2 [1.3, 1.0], SUCRA 0.849) compared to TXA-S (MD -0.97 [-1.0, -0.93], SUCRA 0.646]). CONCLUSIONS: TXA, regardless of the route of administration, is an effective intervention in decreasing bleeding, postoperative complications, and risk of transfusion when compared with placebo. Further studies directly comparing TXA-S to TXA-I would be useful to determine the optimal route of delivery.