ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although pericardial effusion is known to be common among patients infected with HIV, the incidence of pericardial effusion and its relation to survival have never been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate the incidence of pericardial effusion and its relation to mortality in HIV-positive subjects, 601 echocardiograms were performed on 231 subjects recruited over a 5-year period (inception cohort: 59 subjects with asymptomatic HIV, 62 subjects with AIDS-related complex, and 74 subjects with AIDS; 21 HIV-negative healthy gay men; and 15 subjects with non-HIV end-stage medical illness). Echocardiograms were performed every 3 to 6 months (82% had follow-up studies). Sixteen subjects were diagnosed with effusions (prevalence of effusion for AIDS subjects entering the study was 5%). Thirteen subjects developed effusions during follow-up; 12 of these were subjects with AIDS (incidence, 11%/y). The majority of effusions (80%) were small and asymptomatic. The survival of AIDS subjects with effusions was significantly shorter (36% at 6 months) than survival for AIDS subjects without effusions (93% at 6 months). This shortened survival remained significant (relative risk, 2.2, P = .01) after adjustment for lead time bias and was independent of CD4 count and albumin level. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of pericardial effusion in patients with AIDS, and the presence of an effusion is associated with shortened survival. The development of an effusion in the setting of HIV infection suggests end-stage HIV disease (AIDS).
Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Complex/complications , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , AIDS-Related Complex/mortality , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/mortality , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Echocardiography , HIV Seronegativity , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pericardial Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pericardial Effusion/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The difficulty in interpreting the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) due to the interference from muscle potentials produced by arm and leg motion makes it unsuitable during the exercise treadmill test. Likewise, the exercise lead placement ECG cannot substitute for the standard ECG due to significant errors in the former's diagnostic interpretation. This study compares the ECGs recorded via standard and exercise sites regarding frontal and horizontal plane axes, diagnosis and location of myocardial infarction and estimation of infarct size using the complete 54-criteria and 32-point Selvester QRS scoring system. The altered limb lead locations on the exercise ECG caused the QRS vectors to artifactually appear to be directed more inferiorly, posteriorly and rightward, producing a marked rightward mean frontal plane axis shift of +48 degrees (p less than 0.00001). No false positive or false negative anterior infarct was seen on the exercise lead placement ECG, whereas inferior and posterior infarcts were lost in 69% and 31% of patients, respectively. A false lateral infarct was seen in 19% of patients. Estimation of infarct size differed between the 2 ECG sets, with 11 patients increasing their infarct size by 3 to 9% and 14 others decreasing it by 3 to 15% on the exercise lead placement ECG. This study demonstrates that use of body torso positions for limb leads results in substantial QRS waveform variations that disqualify the exercise lead placement ECG as a "standard" recording. Such ECGs should therefore be labeled as "torso positioned" or "nonstandard" to prevent misuse for clinical and investigative purposes.
