ABSTRACT
The Dynamic Assessment Interview (DAI) is a semi-structured interview with anchored scales to rate patients; suitability for psychodynamic psychotherapy. The DAI was inspired by the Personality Assessment Interview developed by Selzer et al. in 1987 and it introduces from the beginning of the assessment interview an explicit focus on the patient's immediate interactions with the interviewer. Seven theoretical derived variables are assessed, namely psychological mindedness, capacity for self-observation, capacity for empathy, tolerance of frustration, motivation, response to confrontation, and ability to contain and work with affect. In addition, the patient's attractiveness as a psychotherapy patient and his or her assumed confidence in the forthcoming treatment are assessed. The patient's personality organization ad modum Kernberg is measured from a global assessment of the interview. The present paper describes the DAI and presents its psychometric properties. An acceptable level of inter-rater agreement was found for the theoretically derived variables and for the personality organization diagnosis, with intra-class correlations or kappa coefficients ranging from 0.68 to 0.80.
Subject(s)
Interview, Psychological/standards , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Selection , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychometrics/methods , Psychotherapy/methods , Adult , Attitude to Health , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Interview, Psychological/methods , Male , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Motivation , Observer Variation , Personality , Professional-Patient Relations , Sampling StudiesABSTRACT
Norms for a Danish adaptation of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) are presented. Four samples tested from 1988 to 1991 (n = 166, n = 54, n = 95, and n = 61) were pooled, resulting in an aggregate sample of 376 participants. The normative data were generally congruent with earlier normative studies with regard to score distribution, item difficulty levels, and reliability. Studies using the Danish adaptation of the HGSHS:A as a screening instrument have shown the predictive value of the instrument in a Danish context. Data for a comparable American sample of volunteers (n = 170) tested by the same hypnotist were included in the analysis. A comparison revealed a marked difference for the posthypnotic suggestion item, hinting that cultural differences between the Danish and American samples with regard to expectancies and attitudes toward hypnosis may play a role. Further studies comparing attitudes toward hypnosis across different cultural contexts are needed to clarify this issue.
