ABSTRACT
The majority of non-specific low back pain has a favourable evolution within a short period of time but in some cases the pain becomes persistent or recurrent. These chronic forms are responsible for most of the social and economic burden of low back pain. The crucial role of psycho-social factors in the chronicisation of low back pain justifies a thorough bio-psycho-social assessment. An active semi-intensive ambulatory multidisciplinary programme (Spine Unit Center) that complies with international and national recommendations (KCE and INAMI) has demonstrated its effectiveness in chronic low back pain in terms of algo-functional, physical and psycho-social components. In contrast to intensive programmes requiring hospitalisation, this outpatient treatment allows the patient to remain in his/her social and professional network. The active participation and motivation of the patient are essential for the success of the treatment. The multidisciplinary team will help the patient to define his/her functional objectives and to manage, via the psychologist, emotional aspects. The programme includes therapeutic education and physical reconditioning sessions including progressive aerobic training, group exercises, and individualised and progressive strengthening of the trunk muscles. The introduction of physical activity at home will be encouraged in order to sustain the changes in the patient's behaviour.
La majorité des lombalgies non spécifiques présente une évolution favorable dans un délai assez court, mais, dans certains cas, les douleurs deviennent persistantes ou récurrentes. Ces formes chroniques sont responsables de l'essentiel du poids social et économique des lombalgies. Le rôle crucial des facteurs psycho-sociaux dans la chronicisation de la lombalgie justifie une évaluation bio-psycho-sociale approfondie. Un programme pluridisciplinaire ambulatoire actif semi-intensif («Clinique du Dos¼) répondant aux recommandations internationales et nationales (KCE et INAMI) a démontré une efficacité sur les composantes algo-fonctionnelles, physiques et psycho-sociales du patient lombalgique chronique. Contrairement aux programmes intensifs imposant une hospitalisation, cette prise en charge ambulatoire permet au patient de rester dans son réseau social et professionnel. La participation active et la motivation du patient constituent les éléments essentiels pour la réussite du traitement. L'équipe pluridisciplinaire l'aidera à définir ses objectifs fonctionnels et à gérer, via le psychologue, certains aspects émotionnels en lien avec la douleur. Le programme comprend des séances d'éducation thérapeutique et de reconditionnement physique, incluant un entraînement aérobie progressif, une gymnastique collective de tonification et un renforcement individualisé et graduel des muscles du tronc. L'instauration d'une activité physique à domicile sera encouragée de manière à pérenniser les changements de comportement du patient.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low Back Pain , Medicine , Humans , Male , Female , Low Back Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Ambulatory Care , Exercise , Treatment Outcome , Chronic Pain/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has been controversially stated that pain-related fear is a more important determining factor for disability in chronic low back pain (CLBP) than pain or physical impairment in itself. So far, the relationship between psychological and physiological determinants of chronic pain, that is, pain-related fear and physiological abilities, remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether pain-related fear assessed by different tools (both task specific and non task specific) is related to physical capacity measured by specific spine tests and, secondarily, to explore the relationship between different pain-related fear assessment tools. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifty patients with CLBP (50% women; meanage [standard deviationage]: 44.2 [9.5 years]). OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical capacity by means of three specific spine tests, that is, the finger-floor distance test (flexibility), a maximal isometric strength test of trunk extensor muscles (strength), and the Sorensen test (endurance). Pain-related fear by means of self-report measures, that is, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Photograph Series of Daily Activities (PHODA), and a fear visual analog scale (FVAS) tailored to the spine tests. METHODS: Participants were asked to complete the TSK and PHODA and to perform the three spine tests. Right before performing each of the spine tests, an FVAS was filled out. Linear regression analyses controlling for gender and age were performed to study the association between the pain-related fear measurements and the results of the spine tests. To investigate the relationship between the pain-related fear measurements, correlation tests were performed. RESULTS: The linear regression analyses revealed that neither the TSK and PHODA scores nor the FVAS scores were significantly related to the physical capacity measurements. The correlational tests showed no significant correlation between the PHODA, TSK, and FVAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that neither the task-specific tool (FVAS) nor the non task-specific questionnaires (TSK and PHODA) were significantly correlated to the spine tests in patients with CLBP. This is contrary to earlier evidence according to which physical capacity is inversely related to the level of pain-related fear, and it suggests that one should not draw conclusions about physical capacity based on pain-related fear scores. Furthermore, the different assessment tools for pain-related fear were surprisingly not correlated with each other.
Subject(s)
Fear/psychology , Low Back Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain/psychology , Spine/physiopathology , Adult , Chronic Pain/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a semi-intensive multidisciplinary outpatient program complying with the requirements of the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance and intended for patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: We included 262 patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain, among whom 136 (73 women and 63 men) with a mean pain duration of 11.3 years completed the outpatient program (36 sessions each lasting 2h). The program consisted of education about back-sparing techniques, interventions by an occupational therapist and psychologist, and physical reconditioning. Three sessions (sessions 1, 18, and 36) were used to evaluate pain intensity, functional impairment, kinesiophobia, cognitive knowledge, knowledge of appropriate spinal movement technique, and physical performance (trunk muscle strength and endurance, mobility of the pelvis and lumbar spine, and aerobic capacity). RESULTS: All study variables were significantly improved at study completion compared to baseline: pain intensity was decreased by 44%, functional impairment by 40%, and kinesiophobia by 11% whereas knowledge was improved by 59%, back-sparing technique by 95%, trunk muscle strength by 40% on average, trunk extensor muscle endurance by 90%, mobility by 8%, and aerobic capacity by 18%. CONCLUSIONS: A semi-intensive multidisciplinary outpatient program was beneficial in patients with chronic low back pain. Careful patient selection and increased patient involvement in the program may help to improve adherence.
