The effect of backpack weight on the performance of basic short-term/working memory tasks while walking along a pre-determined route.

This study investigated possible backpack weight effects on the performance of three basic short-term/working memory (STM/WM) tasks conducted concurrently with the physical task of route walking. The STM/WM tasks were the Corsi block-tapping, digit span, and 3-back tasks, and, were employed to examine the visuo-spatial sketchpad, phonological loop and central executive components of the WM system. Four backpack weight levels (0%, 15%, 25% and 40% of body mass) were considered. Thirty participants conducted the three experimental tasks requiring physical-cognitive multitasking. Data analyses revealed that: (1) increased backpack weight resulted in decreases in the performance of the Corsi block-tapping and the 3-back task, but (2) backpack weight did not significantly affect the digit span task performance. The study results suggest that reducing backpack weight could benefit the performance of various cognitive tasks during route walking. The study findings may be useful for the ergonomics design of body-worn equipment and human-system interfaces.Practitioner summary: This study examined the backpack weight effects on the performance of three basic short-term/working memory tasks conducted concurrently with the physical task of route walking. The study revealed that reducing backpack weight could benefit various cognitive tasks during physical-cognitive multitasking, especially cognitive tasks that require visuospatial processing and executive control.

Effects of backpack weight on the performance of basic short-term/working memory tasks during flat-surface standing.

This study empirically investigated the effects of backpack weight on the performance of three basic short-term/working memory (STM/WM) tasks during flat-surface standing. Four levels of backpack weight were considered: 0, 15, 25 and 40% of the body weight. The three STM/WM tasks were the Corsi block, digit span and 3-back tasks, corresponding to the visuo-spatial sketchpad, phonological loop and central executive of WM, respectively. Thirty participants conducted the STM/WM tasks while standing with loaded backpack. Major study findings were that (1) increased backpack weight adversely affected the scores of all three STM/WM tasks; and, (2) the adverse effect of backpack weight was less pronounced for the phonological loop STM task than the other STM/WM tasks. The study findings may help understand and predict the impacts of body-worn equipment weight on the worker's mental task performance for various work activities requiring simultaneous performance of mental and physical tasks. Practitioner summary: The current study empirically examined the effects of backpack weight on the performance of three basic STM/WM tasks. The study findings entail that reduces the weight of body-worn equipment can positively impact the worker's mental task performance in addition to reducing the worker's bodily stresses. Abbreviations: ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; AP: anterior-posterior; BW: body weight; CoP: centre of pressure; C-S: central executive working memory task and standing; DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; HIP: human information processing; ML: medio-lateral; PMC: premotor cortex; P-S: phonological loop short-term memory task and standing; SMA: supplementary motor area; STM: short-term memory; VLPFC: ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; V-S: visuo-spatial short-term memory task and standing; WM: working memory.

Evaluating the utility of two gestural discomfort evaluation methods.

Evaluating physical discomfort of designed gestures is important for creating safe and usable gesture-based interaction systems; yet, gestural discomfort evaluation has not been extensively studied in HCI, and few evaluation methods seem currently available whose utility has been experimentally confirmed. To address this, this study empirically demonstrated the utility of the subjective rating method after a small number of gesture repetitions (a maximum of four repetitions) in evaluating designed gestures in terms of physical discomfort resulting from prolonged, repetitive gesture use. The subjective rating method has been widely used in previous gesture studies but without empirical evidence on its utility. This study also proposed a gesture discomfort evaluation method based on an existing ergonomics posture evaluation tool (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) and demonstrated its utility in evaluating designed gestures in terms of physical discomfort resulting from prolonged, repetitive gesture use. Rapid Upper Limb Assessment is an ergonomics postural analysis tool that quantifies the work-related musculoskeletal disorders risks for manual tasks, and has been hypothesized to be capable of correctly determining discomfort resulting from prolonged, repetitive gesture use. The two methods were evaluated through comparisons against a baseline method involving discomfort rating after actual prolonged, repetitive gesture use. Correlation analyses indicated that both methods were in good agreement with the baseline. The methods proposed in this study seem useful for predicting discomfort resulting from prolonged, repetitive gesture use, and are expected to help interaction designers create safe and usable gesture-based interaction systems.

An investigation on inter-individual variation in perceived discomfort of static posture holding.

BACKGROUND: Realizing population-level discomfort evaluation and control of common static posture holding tasks requires an understanding of the inter-individual variation in discomfort perception. However, little research is available. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the types of mathematical probability distribution suitable for modeling population discomfort distributions of various static posture holding tasks and characterize how the magnitude of inter-individual variation in perceived discomfort varies across static posture holding tasks. SUBJECTS: Ten male and ten female subjects participated. METHODS: The participants conducted static posture holding for a set of 180 short-duration (20-second-long) static posture holding tasks and subjectively rated the overall perceived discomfort for each task using the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale. Statistical analyses were conducted according to the study objectives. RESULTS: The static posture holding tasks exhibited multifarious discomfort distribution patterns. Probability distribution identification analyses indicated that no single distribution type could represent population discomfort distributions universally across different static posture holding tasks. Sample standard deviation of discomfort ratings data quantifying the magnitude of inter-individual variation in discomfort perception varied considerably across static posture holding tasks. It seemed to have a positive relationship with sample mean within the range of the experimental conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Population-level evaluation of discomforts associated with static posture holding tasks must be based on careful examinations of empirical discomfort distributions.