Personal health budget in patients with first episode psychosis: A new rehabilitation model based on a community care system in Italy.

AIM: Recently, there has been increasing interest in providing Personal Health Budgets (PHBs) to patients with severe mental illness. However, information on implementing PHB initiatives is still limited. Aim of this observational study was to evaluate the applicability of a PHB intervention model in a sample of Italian adults with first-episode psychosis (FEP) across a 2-year follow-up period. METHODS: Participants (n = 104; 18-50 years) were recruited within the 'Parma-Early Psychosis' program and completed the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), the health of nation outcome scale (HoNOS) and the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kaplan-Maier survival analysis (as drop-out measure) were performed. RESULTS: A significant effect of time on all BPRS, HoNOS and GAF scores along the follow-up was observed in both the FEP subgroups (i.e., with [n = 49] and without [n = 55] PHB intervention). Mixed-design ANOVA results showed a significant 'time x group' interaction effects on BPRS 'Disorganization', HoNOS 'Psychiatric Symptoms' and GAF scores in FEP participants with PHB. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis showed a longer survival mean for FEP patients with PHB. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the applicability of a PHB model within an 'Early Intervention in Psychosis' program in public community mental health services.

Personal Health Budget as a new rehabilitation model for severe mental illness within a caring community: An Italian evaluation study of beneficial effects.

OBJECTIVE: Personal Health Budget has been provided to consumers with severe mental illness within a policy shift toward a person-tailored mental healthcare treatment based on individual unmet needs. Evidence of beneficial effects of Personal Health Budget is still scarce. The aim of this study was to provide preliminary data on clinical and social benefits of adding Personal Health Budget to a standard pharmacotherapy in patients with severe mental illness across a 24-month follow-up period. METHODS: Participants (n = 137) were individuals with severe mental illness, aged 18-50 years, recruited in one of the adult mental health services of the Parma Department of Mental Health. They completed the Global Assessment of Functioning scale, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. This age range was chosen to limit Personal Health Budget interventions to adults with a non-prolonged illness duration. Friedman's test for repeated measure was used to assess the longitudinal stability of functioning and clinical parameters. A linear regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: A significant decrease in all Global Assessment of Functioning scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores along the 24 months of follow-up was observed. Regression analysis results specifically showed a relevant association between a Personal Health Budget multiaxial intervention and the longitudinal reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 'Negative Symptoms' and Health of the Nation Outcome Scale 'Social Problems' subscores. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the useful implementation of a Health of the Nation Outcome Scale approach for severe mental illness patients within the Italian mental health service network.