Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergol Select ; 2(1): 89-93, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826036

ABSTRACT

For the success of an immunotherapy regimen, adherence is a major success factor. The goal of our study was to identify the factors that positively and negatively influence patient compliance, and to create strategies to improve it. Four questionnaires were designed for different patient groups: A - after immunotherapy; B - during immunotherapy; C - before immunotherapy; D - no experience with immunotherapy. From March to October 2008, 790 questionnaires were collected. For the first group, questionnaire A was answered by 272 patients. Of these, 15.8% had dropped out of immunotherapy. Women had higher dropout rates than men (16.8% vs. 12.3%). The following aspects of immunotherapy were viewed by the patients as negative: time consuming (69.5%), adverse reactions (62.5%), insufficient patient information (53.7%), no change in use of symptomatic medication (33.8%) and no change in symptoms (60.7%). Despite the mentioned drawbacks, 74% of all patients would still recommend allergen immunotherapy. Questionnaire B was completed by 281 patients. In this group, 8.7% had already considered dropping out. The following unfavourable aspects were identified: time consuming (66.2%), adverse reactions (61.9%), insufficient patient information (54.8%), no change in symptoms (51.2%) and use of symptomatic medication (47.0%). Despite this, up to 95.4% of all patients would recommend immunotherapy. Questionnaire C was filled-out by 55 patients. The following reasons were rated by the patients as "important" or "very important" for the decision to start hyposensitization: long-lasting symptom alleviation (100%), few adverse reactions (98.2%), comprehensive patient information (96.3%), easy integration into daily routine (89.1%), re-assessment of therapy by doctor (83.3%) and reduced need for symptomatic medication (81.8%). Questionnaire D was filled in by 182 participants. 89% had already heard the term hyposensitization before. Their general knowledge regarding this therapy was average (3.23 on a scale of 1 - 6; where 1 = optimum). Long-lasting symptom alleviation (99.5%), comprehensive patient information (97.8%), easy integration into daily routine (96.1%), reduced symptomatic medication use (92.6%) and re-assessment by doctor (88.8%) were considered "very important" or "important" characters in the desired immunotherapy regime. Adherence to the hyposensitization schedule is essential for its success. The treating doctor should aim at choosing the right therapy and working out an individualized patient treatment plan. Equally important is providing information to the patient throughout the duration of the treatment. The doctor should assist the patient to create an optimized time schedule to help make the therapy less time-consuming.

2.
Forensic Sci Int ; 106(3): 147-56, 1999 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10680063

ABSTRACT

Twelve different sets of confiscated ecstasy samples were analysed applying both near infrared spectroscopy in reflectance mode (1100-2500 nm) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The sets showed a large variance in composition. A calibration data set was generated based on the theory of factorial designs. It contained 221 N-methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDMA) samples, 167 N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE), 111 amphetamine and 106 samples without a controlled substance, which will be called placebo samples thereafter. From this data set, PLS-1 models were calculated and were successfully applied for validation of various external laboratory test sets. The transferability of these results to confiscated tablets is demonstrated here. It is shown that differentiation into placebo, amphetamine and ecstasy samples is possible. Analysis of intact tablets is practicable. However, more reliable results are obtained from pulverised samples. This is due to ill-defined production procedures. The use of mathematically pretreated spectra improves the prediction quality of all the PLS-1 models studied. It is possible to improve discrimination between MDE and MDMA with the help of a second model based on raw spectra. Alternative strategies are briefly discussed.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens/analysis , Mass Screening/methods , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/analysis , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods , Amphetamines/analysis , Amphetamines/chemistry , Calibration , Central Nervous System Stimulants/analysis , Central Nervous System Stimulants/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Forensic Medicine , Hallucinogens/chemistry , Humans , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/chemistry , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Tablets/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...