Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice. METHODS: Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm. RESULTS: Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were "treatment is not (yet) necessary" (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37-5.37) than women choosing CT. CONCLUSION: The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.

Simplified versus standard regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For focal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's oesophagus, a simplified regimen (3 × 15 J/cm2, without cleaning) has proven to be as effective as the standard regimen (2 × 15 J/cm2, followed by cleaning, followed by 2 × 15 J/cm2). However, this simplified regimen seemed to be associated with a higher stenosis rate. Therefore, we lowered the radiofrequency energy and hypothesised that this new simplified regimen would be as effective and safe as the standard regimen. METHODS: This randomised non-inferiority trial included patients with dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus or residual Barrett's oesophagus after endoscopic resection or circumferential radiofrequency ablation, in five European tertiary referral centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the new simplified regimen (3 × 12 J/cm2, without cleaning) or the standard regimen, with variable block sizes of four, six, and eight patients, stratified by participating hospital. Focal radiofrequency ablation was done every 3 months, up to a maximum of three treatments, until all Barrett's oesophagus was eradicated. The primary outcome was complete endoscopic and histological regression of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia after two focal radiofrequency ablation treatments, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferiority was assessed on the basis of the difference between groups in the median percentage of Barrett's oesophagus surface regression, with a non-inferiority margin of -15%. This study is registered with www.trialregister.nl, number NTR4994, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between March 25, 2015, and July 25, 2016, 84 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 44 to receive the simplified regimen and 40 to receive the standard regimen. One patient assigned to the simplified regimen and four assigned to the standard regimen were excluded because they weree found not to be eligible; therefore the final intention-to-treat population consisted of 43 patients in the simplified ablation group and 36 in the standard ablation group. Complete endoscopic and histological regression of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia after two focal radiofrequency ablation treatments was achieved in 32 (74%, 95% CI 59-87) patients treated with the simplified protocol, versus 30 (83%, 95% CI 67-94) patients treated with the standard protocol (p=0·34). Median Barrett's oesophagus surface regression after two focal radiofrequency ablation sessions was 98% (IQR 95-100) in the simplified regimen group and 100% (97-100) in the standard regimen group. The difference between medians was 2% (95% CI -0·562 to 3·162); thus the simplified regimen was deemed non-inferior to the standard regimen. Stenoses requiring dilatation were observed in four (9%) of 43 patients in the simplified regimen group and four (11%) of 36 in the standard regimen group. Post-procedural bleeding requiring repeat endoscopy occurred in one (2%) patient in the simplified ablation group and three (8%) patients in the standard ablation group. One patient (2%) in the simplified treatment group died 36 days after the second radiofrequency ablation procedure, due to an unknown cause. INTERPRETATION: Based on the results of this study, we conclude that the simplified regimen is the preferred regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's oesophagus. FUNDING: None.

Pseudo-buried Barrett's post radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus, with or without prior endoscopic resection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: In our experience, biopsies from small residual islands of nonburied Barrett's mucosa after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are occasionally reported by pathologists to contain "buried Barrett's" upon histological evaluation, despite the fact that these islands of columnar mucosa were visible endoscopically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of buried Barrett's in biopsies obtained from small residual Barrett's islands ( < 5 mm) sampled post-RFA, compared with biopsies from normal neosquamous epithelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Biopsies obtained from normal-appearing neosquamous epithelium and from small Barrett's islands ( < 5 mm) in 69 consecutive Barrett's patients treated with RFA were evaluated for the presence of buried columnar mucosa. RESULTS: A total of 2515 biopsies were obtained from neosquamous epithelium during follow-up post-RFA. Buried glands were found in 0.1 % of biopsies from endoscopically normal neosquamous epithelium. However, when small islands of columnar mucosa were biopsied, buried glands were detected in 21 % of biopsies. CONCLUSION: To avoid accidental sampling of small islands resulting in a false-positive histological diagnosis of buried Barrett's, thorough inspection should be performed before obtaining biopsies during post-RFA follow-up.

Remission of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with or without endoscopic resection effectively eradicates Barrett's esophagus (BE) containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and/or early-stage cancer. We followed patients who received RFA for BE containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and/or early-stage cancer for 5 years to determine the durability of treatment response. METHODS: We followed 54 patients with BE (2-12 cm), previously enrolled in 4 consecutive cohort studies in which they underwent focal endoscopic resection in case of visible lesions (n = 40 [72%]), followed by serial RFA every 3 months. Patients underwent high-resolution endoscopy with narrow-band imaging at 6 and 12 months after treatment and then annually for 5 years (median, 61 months; interquartile range, 53-65 months); random biopsy samples were collected from neosquamous epithelium and gastric cardia. After 5 years, endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection of neosquamous epithelium were performed. Outcomes included sustained complete remission of neoplasia or intestinal metaplasia (IM), IM in gastric cardia, or buried glands in neosquamous epithelium. RESULTS: After 5 years, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed sustained complete remission of neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia in 90% of patients; neoplasia recurred in 3 patients and was managed endoscopically. Focal IM in the cardia was found in 19 of 54 patients (35%), in 53 of 1143 gastric cardia biopsies (4.6%). The incidence of IM of the cardia did not increase over time; and IM was diagnosed based on only a single biopsy in 89% of patients. Buried glands were detected in 3 of 3543 neosquamous epithelium biopsies (0.08%, from 3 patients). No endoscopic resection samples had buried glands. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who have undergone RFA with or without endoscopic resection for neoplastic BE, 90% remain in remission at 5-year follow-up, with all recurrences managed endoscopically. This treatment approach is therefore an effective and durable alternative to esophagectomy; www.trialregister.nl number, NTR2938.

A simplified regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's mucosa: a randomized multicenter trial comparing two ablation regimens.

BACKGROUND: The currently recommended regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) comprises 2 applications of energy, cleaning of the device and ablation zone, and 2 additional applications of energy. A simplified regimen may be of clinical utility if it is faster, easier, and equally safe and effective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 2 focal RFA regimens. SETTING: Three tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients scheduled for focal RFA of BE with flat type BE with at least 2 BE islands or mosaic groups of islands were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: BE areas were paired: 1 area was randomized to the "standard" regimen (2 × 15 J/cm(2)-clean-2 × 15 J/cm(2)) or to the "simplified" regimen (3 × 15 J/cm(2)-no clean), allocating the second area automatically to the other regimen. The percentage of surface area regression of each area was scored at 2 months by the endoscopist (blinded). OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of completely removed BE areas at 2 months. Calculated sample size was 46 pairs of BE areas using a noninferiority design. Noninferiority was defined as <20% difference in the paired proportions. RESULTS: Forty-five equivalent pairs of BE areas were included in 41 patients. The proportion of completely removed BE areas at 2 months after focal RFA was 30 (67%) for standard and 33 (73%) for simplified. Noninferiority was demonstrated by a 7% difference (95% CI, -10.6 to +20.9). LIMITATIONS: Tertiary referral centers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multicenter randomized trial suggest that a simplified 3 × 15 J/cm(2) focal ablation regimen is not inferior to the standard regimen, regarding the endoscopic removal of residual Barrett islands.

Circumferential balloon-based radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia can be simplified, yet efficacy maintained, by omitting the cleaning phase.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The current procedure for circumferential balloon-based radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) for the removal of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) is labor intensive, comprising 2 ablation passes with a cleaning step to remove debris from the ablation zone and electrode. We compared the safety and efficacy of 3 different c-RFA ablation regimens. METHODS: We performed a prospective trial of consecutive patients with flat-type BE with high-grade dysplasia. Fifty-seven patients (45 men; age, 64 ± 15 y; 28 with prior endoscopic resection) were assigned randomly to groups that underwent c-RFA with a double application of RFA (12 J/cm(2)). The standard group received c-RFA, with device removal and cleaning, followed by c-RFA; the simple-with-cleaning group underwent c-RFA, with device cleaning without removal, followed by c-RFA; and the simple-no-cleaning group received 2 applications of c-RFA, and the device was not removed or cleaned. The primary outcome was surface regression of BE 3 months later, graded by 2 blinded expert endoscopists. Calculated sample size was 57 patients, based on a noninferiority design. RESULTS: Median BE surface regression at 3 months was 83% in the standard group, 78% in the simple-with-cleaning group, and 88% in the simple-no-cleaning group (P = .14). RF ablation time was 20 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 18-25 min) for the standard group, 13 minutes (IQR, 11-15 min) for the simple-with-cleaning group, and 5 minutes (IQR, 5-9 min) for the simple-no-cleaning group (P < .01). The median number of introductions (RFA devices/endoscope) for the standard group was 7, vs 4 for the simple groups (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, prospective study suggests that c-RFA is easier and faster, but equally safe and effective, when the cleaning phase between ablations is omitted or simplified. Trialregister.nl, NTR 2495.

Stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: After focal endoscopic resection (ER) of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or early cancer (EC) in Barrett's oesophagus (BO), eradication of all remaining BO reduces the recurrence risk. The aim of this study was to compare the safety of stepwise radical ER (SRER) versus focal ER followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for complete eradication of BO containing HGD/EC. METHODS: A multicentre randomised clinical trial was carried out in three tertiary centres. Patients with BO ≤ 5 cm containing HGD/EC were randomised to SRER or ER/RFA. Patients in the SRER group underwent piecemeal ER of 50% of BO followed by serial ER. Patients in the ER/RFA group underwent focal ER for visible lesions followed by serial RFA. Follow-up endoscopy with biopsies (four-quadrant/2 cm BO) was performed at 6 and 12 months and then annually. The main outcome measures were: stenosis rate; complications; complete histological response for neoplasia (CR-neoplasia); and complete histological response for intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM). RESULTS: CR-neoplasia was achieved in 25/25 (100%) SRER and in 21/22 (96%) ER/RFA patients. CR-IM was achieved in 23 (92%) SRER and 21 (96%) ER/RFA patients. The stenosis rate was significantly higher in SRER (88%) versus ER/RFA (14%; p<0.001), resulting in more therapeutic sessions in SRER (6 vs 3; p<0.001) due to dilations. After median 24 months follow-up, one SRER patient had recurrence of EC, requiring ER. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BO ≤ 5 cm containing HGD/EC, SRER and ER/RFA achieved comparably high rates of CR-IM and CR-neoplasia. However, SRER was associated with a higher number of complications and therapeutic sessions. For these patients, a combined endoscopic approach of focal ER followed by RFA may thus be preferred over SRER. Clinical trial number NTR1337.

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with endoscopic resection for barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is safe and effective for eradicating intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of RFA in conjunction with baseline endoscopic resection for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and early cancer. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 24 patients (mean age, 65 years; median Barrett's esophagus, 8 cm), with Barrett's esophagus of < or =12 cm containing HGIN or early cancer, from 3 European tertiary-care medical centers. Visible lesions were endoscopically resected, followed by serial RFA. Focal escape endoscopic resection was used if Barrett tissue persisted despite RFA. Complete response, defined as all biopsies negative for intestinal metaplasia and neoplasia, was assessed during endoscopy with 4-quadrant biopsies taken every 1 cm of the original Barrett's segment 2 months after the patient was last treated. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent pre-RFA endoscopic resection for visible lesions; 16 patients had early cancer and 7 patients had HGIN. The worst residual histology results, pre-RFA (after any endoscopic resection) were: HGIN (10 patients), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (11 patients), and intestinal metaplasia (3 patients). Neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia were eradicated in 95% and 88% of patients, respectively; after escape endoscopic resection in 2 patients, rates improved to 100% and 96%, respectively. Complications after RFA included melena (n = 1) and dysphagia (n = 1). After additional follow-up (median, 22 months; interquartile range, 17.2-23.8 months) no neoplasia recurred. CONCLUSIONS: This European multicenter study to show that early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus can be effectively and safely treated with RFA, in combination with prior endoscopic resection of visible lesions.

Properties of the neosquamous epithelium after radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus containing neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) eradicates intestinal metaplasia and intraepithelial neoplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE), restoring an endoscopically normal neosquamous epithelium (NSE). We evaluated the post-RFA NSE for genetic abnormalities and buried glandular mucosa. METHODS: Eligible patients underwent RFA for BE containing early cancer and/or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia with subsequent complete histological reversion to normal NSE. At baseline, the BE was sampled by brush cytology and biopsies. At least 2 months after RFA, the NSE was sampled by brush cytology, keyhole biopsies, and endoscopic resection. The untreated squamous epithelium was biopsied as a control. The baseline BE and post-RFA NSE were evaluated for immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67 and p53, and genetic abnormalities (DNA-fluorescent in situ hybridization: chromosome 1 and 9, p16 and p53). In addition, biopsy depth was compared for biopsies from the NSE and untreated squamous epithelium. The presence of buried glandular mucosa in NSE was assessed with primary and keyhole biopsy, and endoscopic resection. RESULTS: All pretreatment specimens from all 22 patients showed abnormalities on immunohistochemical staining and fluorescent in situ hybridization, whereas all post-RFA NSE specimens were normal. All the post-RFA biopsies from the NSE contained full epithelia, whereas 37% contained lamina propria, a finding no different from biopsies from untreated squamous epithelium (36% lamina propria). Deeper keyhole biopsies contained lamina propria in 51%. All endoscopic resection specimens contained submucosa, whereas no biopsy or endoscopic resection specimen contained buried glandular mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous evaluation of the post-RFA NSE in patients who, at baseline, had BE containing early cancer high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, showed neither persistent genetic abnormalities nor buried glandular mucosa.

Successful balloon-based radiofrequency ablation of a widespread early squamous cell carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: For selected patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or early esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC), endoscopic therapy represents a nonsurgical treatment option. For widespread lesions, however, current endoscopic treatment modalities (eg, endoscopic resection, argon plasma coagulation, photodynamic therapy) are associated with considerable drawbacks, of which esophageal stricturing is the most significant. Balloon-based radiofrequency (RF) ablation (HALO System) is a promising technology for endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus, and may also play a role in treating widespread HGD and early ESCC. OBJECTIVE: We describe a case report of balloon-based RF ablation for HGD and early ESCC. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Tertiary care institution, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PATIENT: A 66-year-old male with a 35-mm large, flat-type ESCC with surrounding HGD. INTERVENTION: Balloon-based RF ablation (HALO System). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Endoscopic and histological eradication of HGD and ESCC, and adverse events. RESULTS: RF ablation resulted in complete endoscopic and histological eradication of HGD and ESCC without adverse events such as dysphagia or esophageal narrowing. LIMITATIONS: Single patient report, limited follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of balloon-based RF ablation for esophageal HGD and early ESCC. The treatment resulted in complete eradication of a 35-mm flat ESCC with no adverse events. This suggests that this ablation technique deserves further study for the management of widespread HGD or flat-type ESCC.

Eradication of Barrett esophagus with early neoplasia by radiofrequency ablation, with or without endoscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation is safe and effective for complete eradication of nondysplastic Barrett esophagus (BE). The aim was to report the combined results of two published and two ongoing studies on radiofrequency ablation of BE with early neoplasia, as presented at SSAT presidential plenary session DDW 2008. METHODS: Enrolled patients had BE < or = 12 cm with early neoplasia. Visible lesions were endoscopically resected. A balloon-based catheter was used for circumferential ablation and an endoscope-based catheter for focal ablation. Ablation was repeated every 2 months until the entire Barrett epithelium was endoscopically and histologically eradicated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included (35 men, median age 68 years, median BE 7 cm). Thirty-one patients first underwent endoscopic resection [early cancer (n = 16), high-grade dysplasia (n = 12), low-grade dysplasia (n = 3)]. Worst histology remaining after resection was high-grade (n = 32), low-grade (n = 10), or no (n = 2) dysplasia. After ablation, complete histological eradication of all dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia was achieved in 43 patients (98%). Complications following ablation were mucosal laceration at resection site (n = 3) and transient dysphagia (n = 4). After 21 months of follow-up (interquartile range 10-27), no dysplasia had recurred. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation, with or without prior endoscopic resection for visible abnormalities, is effective and safe in eradicating BE and associated neoplasia.

A comparative analysis by SAGE of gene expression profiles of esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are the two main types of esophageal cancer. Despite extensive research the exact molecular basis of these cancers is unclear. Therefore we evaluated the transcriptome of EA in comparison to non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE), the metaplastic epithelium that predisposes for EA, and compared the transcriptome of ESCC to normal esophageal squamous epithelium. For obtaining the transcriptomes tissue biopsies were used and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) was applied. Validation of results by RT-PCR and immunoblotting was performed using tissues of an additional 23 EA and ESCC patients. Over 58,000 tags were sequenced. Between EA and BE 1013, and between ESCC and normal squamous epithelium 1235 tags were significantly differentially expressed (p<0.05). The most up-regulated genes in EA compared to BE were SRY-box 4 and Lipocalin2, whereas the most down-regulated genes in EA were Trefoil factors and Annexin A10. The most up-regulated genes in ESCC compared to normal squamous epithelium were BMP4, E-Cadherin and TFF3. The results could suggest that the BE expression profile is closer related to normal squamous esophagus then to EA. In addition, several uniquely expressed genes are identified.