Risk of stroke after unilateral or bilateral TKA (simultaneous and staged without discharge) in 327,438 matched patients using data from the National Health Insurance Claims for South Korea.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of stroke in patients treated with bilateral TKA compared with patients with unilateral TKA. METHODS: In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we compared patients undergoing unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA using data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2017 and included patients older than 40 years of age who underwent primary TKA by the index date as documented primary diagnosis and first additional diagnosis without a history of stroke during the preceding 1 year. We used matched Cox regression models to compare the incidence rate and risk factors of newly acquired stroke among patients treated with unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA after propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: In the present study, 163,719 patients who received unilateral TKA were matched to 163,719 patients with bilateral TKA based on PS. The risk of stroke during the study period was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.79). Patients who received bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: advanced age (70-79 years, HR 0.76), female sex (HR 0.75), rural area (HR 0.77), small- or medium-sized hospital (HR 0.75), health insurance (HR 0.77), history of hypertension drug use (HR 0.75), congestive heart failure (HR 0.70), connective tissue disease (HR 0.71), diabetes (HR 0.77), and diabetes with complication (HR 0.76). CONCLUSION: The risk of stroke was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA. Patients treated with bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: age (70-79 years), female sex, health insurance, history of hypertension drug use, and comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure, connective tissue disease, and diabetes.

Arthroscopic Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Improved the Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Persistent Symptomatic Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Instability After Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To investigate the longitudinal trend of symptomatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability after plate fixation for distal radius fractures (DRFs), determine which factors are associated with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability, and evaluate the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) in patients with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability after plate fixation for DRF. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent plate fixation for DRF between January 2014 and December 2017 and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year were included in this retrospective study. DRUJ instability was evaluated by subjective ulnar wrist pain and physical examination that included foveal sign and ballottement testing every 2 months after surgery. In patients with persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability lasting >6 months, arthroscopic transosseous foveal repair was performed with consent. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. The Generalized Estimating Equation model was used to analyze the incidence rate trend of symptomatic DRUJ instability. RESULTS: Overall, 204 patients were included. The incidence of symptomatic DRUJ instability decreased gradually with time after fixation for DRF until 6 months and was maintained thereafter. Thirty-four of 204 patients (16.6%) had persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability. In multivariable analysis, only high-energy injury was an independent risk factor for persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability (P = .003; odds ratio = 3.599). Seventeen patients underwent arthroscopic foveal repair. The mean follow-up period thereafter was 28.6 months. All clinical outcomes improved significantly compared with preoperative values, and no patient had residual DRUJ instability. CONCLUSION: In patients who had persistent symptomatic DRUJ instability for >6 months after plate fixation for DRFs, arthroscopic foveal repair of the TFCC is considered as a treatment option. Arthroscopic foveal repair of the TFCC to stabilize the DRUJ provided satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes and decreased ulnar-side pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome with or without arthroscopic debridement.

Forty-four patients who had been diagnosed with ulnar impaction syndrome and who were scheduled to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy were randomized into two groups, one treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the other treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy combined with arthroscopic debridement. The response to treatment, including the pain numeric rating scale in an ulnar provocation test and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was assessed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. The mean pain and disability scores showed significant clinical improvement at the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The pain scores at 3 months of follow-up were significantly better in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the disability scores at 3 and 12 months, or in the pain scores at 12-month follow-up. We conclude that similar improvements in symptom severity and hand function occurred in the long term in patients both with and without concomitant arthroscopic debridement. This information regarding concomitant arthroscopy could be used in the informed consent discussion with patients scheduled for ulnar shortening osteotomy. Level of evidence: II.