Short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant sintilimab with chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a case series.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy seems to be a promising treatment option for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sintilimab, as a programmed death receptor-1 inhibitor, has exhibited a fine performance in treating NSCLC. However, the efficiency of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy for stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to share our experience on sintilimab in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who received surgical resection following 1-3 cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab (200 mg) with chemotherapy for stage III NSCLC between June 2020 and March 2022 in our center. Patients characteristics, surgical factors, surgery-related complications 30 days postoperatively, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) before surgery were recorded through reviewing medical record data and telephone follow-up. Results: A total of eight patients were enrolled, including six cases of squamous cell carcinoma and two cases of adenocarcinoma. All of the patients received 1-3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. There were no treatment-related surgical delays. All patients underwent lobectomy, among which two underwent sleeve lobectomy and one received bronchoplasty. Five patients underwent open thoracotomy. Fibrosis of the primary tumor and lymph nodes was observed in all the cases. There were no surgery-related complications > grade 2 at 30 days postoperatively. According to the radiographic findings, one patient had stable disease and all of the others achieved a partial response. The median of maximum standardized uptake value change from baseline was a 52.75% reduction (range, 37.2-68.8%). Five patients achieved a major pathological response. R0 resection was achieved in all eight cases. One grade 4 event was observed. Neutropenia was the most common TRAE > grade 2 (3/8). There were no cases of treatment discontinuation or dose reduction due to TRAEs. Conclusions: The current study found that neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy bring a high rate of major pathological response and acceptable TRAEs. Even though it increased the difficulties of surgery, there is still no evidence suggesting that it will brings additional surgical death. We believe that neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy might be feasible for stage III NSCLC.

Three-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been used widely for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the extent of lymphadenectomy in MIE. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) in MIE, compared with the standard two-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL). METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (cT1-3,N0-3,M0) between June 2016 and May 2019. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 3-FL or 2-FL during MIE procedures. Perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-16007957). RESULTS: Seventy-six eligible patients were randomly assigned to the 3-FL group (n = 38) and the 2-FL group (n = 38). Compared with patients in the 2-FL group, patients in the 3-FL group had more lymph nodes harvested (54.7 ± 16.5vs 30.9 ± 9.6, P < .001) and more metastatic lymph nodes identified (3.5 ± 4.5 vs 1.7 ± 2.0, P = .027). Patients in the 3-FL group were diagnosed with a more advanced final pathologic TNM stage than patients in the 2-FL group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in blood loss, major postoperative complications, or duration of hospital stay, except that the operation time was longer in the 3-FL group than in the 2-FL group (270.5 ± 45.4 minutes vs 236.7 ± 47.0 minutes, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Three-field lymphadenectomy allowed harvesting of more lymph nodes and more accurate staging without increased surgical risks compared with 2-FL MIE for esophageal cancer.

Utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase in lung cancer diagnosis: a prospective study from China.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and diagnosis is urgent for the sake of effective treatment strategy for lung cancer. However, a convenient, economical and relatively precise method is not available. We here report a prospective study to find the possible value of the combined use of four popular tumor markers in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among patients with suspicious nodules in the lung. METHODS: Six hundred and sixty inpatients with suspicious nodules in the lung were divided into a lung cancer group and a benign pulmonary tumor group according to post-operative histological examinations. Serum levels of four tumor markers including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were assayed for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each tumor marker. The power of lung cancer diagnosis of each tumor marker, as well as a combination of them were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The serum levels (median, range) of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.44 (0.01 - 35.70) ng/ml, 2.49 (0.30 - 26.78) ng/ml, 2.30 (0.82 - 73.33) ng/ml and 10.54 (0.10 - 56.41) ng/ml respectively in lung cancer group, and were 0.32 (0.01 - 0.90) ng/ml, 1.60 (0.20 - 8.93) ng/ml, 1.41 (0.72 - 4.82) ng/ml and 9.36 (6.56 - 24.24) ng/ml respectively in the benign pulmonary tumor group. The difference in each tumor marker between the two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The ROCs of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were 0.702 (95%CI, 0.654 - 0.751), 0.611 (95%CI, 0.563 - 0.659), 0.650 (95%CI, 0.601 - 0.700) and 0.598 (95%CI, 0.542 - 0.654) respectively, indicating very low power of these four tumor markers. When a combination of SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE were employed, the diagnosis power was strengthened. CONCLUSION: SCC, CEA, Cyfra 21-1 and NSE are valuable in the early diagnosis of lung cancer among suspicious nodules in the lung, especially when they were assayed together for one patient.

Diagnostic values of SCC, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE for lung cancer in patients with suspicious pulmonary masses: a single center analysis.

We recruited 805 patients with suspicious pulmonary masses that were identified finally as lung cancer or benign pulmonary masses. The serum levels of four tumor markers, including squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (Cyfra21-1) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were tested for every patient. Though receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated unsatisfactory diagnostic power of those four tumor markers for lung cancer, 37.3% of early-staged lung cancer could be diagnosed just on the combination assays of the four tumor markers, under adjusted cut-off values through our statistical analysis retrospectively.

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis of 13 randomized control trials.

INTRODUCTION: The survival effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear based on the study of most up-to-date literatures. This article contributes to this problem by conducting an updated meta-analysis. METHODS: Based on Burdett et al's (J Thorac Oncol 2006;1:611-621) systematic review, this meta-analysis was conducted. Articles were searched electrically. The possible survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed by hazard ratio (HR) in terms of overall survival. A subgroup meta-analysis with only stage III NSCLC was also conducted. The software of Review Manager was used for data management. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized control trials, 6 of which were new ones, were included into this meta-analysis. The overall survival of NSCLC patients in neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm were improved significantly, comparing with those in surgery-alone arm (combined HR = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.92; p = 0.0001). When only patients with stage III NSCLC were considered, the result was similar (combined HR = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.95; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as an addition of surgery, would significantly improve the overall survival of operable NSCLC patients, including patients with stage III NSCLC.

[Effect of thymectomy in treatment of myasthenia gravis: analysis of 67 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effects of thymectomy in treatment of myasthenia gravis: (MG). METHODS: The clinical data of 67 patients, 29 males and 38 females, aged 10.5 - 68, who underwent thymectomy were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the Monden's standard the overall effective rate of thymectomy was 71.6%. The remission rate was 32.8% (22/6), the improvement rate was 38.8% (26/67), 14 patients showed no change (20.9%), and deterioration was seen in 5 patients (7.5%). CONCLUSION: An effective method to treat MG, thymectomy should be performed on most of the MG patients early and actively.

[Clinical analysis of operation combined chemotherapy for stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To study the therapeutic result of operation combined chemotherapy for stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2003, the data of 83 cases with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer undergoing operation combined chemotherapy and 33 cases with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer undergoing non-operative therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The median survival time and the 1-, 2-, 3- year survival rates of the two groups were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median survival time of the operation group was 20.3 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3- year survival rates were 85%, 70%, and 35% respectively. The median survival time of the non-operation group was 14.5 months and the 1-, 2-, 3- year survival rates were 75%, 33%, and 15% respectively. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic result of the operation combined chemotherapy for the stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer is better than that of the non-operative therapy obviously.