Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping.

BACKGROUND: There is no general consensus about the best anesthesiologic approach to use during craniotomies with intraoperative brain mapping, and large prospective studies evaluating the complications associated with different approaches are lacking. Objective of this study was to prospectively collect and evaluate data about a large series of consecutive asleep-awake and asleep-asleep craniotomies. METHODS: We analyzed 238 consecutive procedures from January 2005 to December 2008. During asleep-awake procedures, patients were initially ventilated through a laryngeal mask which was removed to allow language testing. During asleep-asleep procedures, patients remained sedated and intubated to permit motor testing. RESULTS: In asleep-awake craniotomies [n=135, age 42 y (range: 16 to 72 y), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) 1 (1 to 3), and body mass index 24.2+/-3.7 kg/m], 43% of the procedures were free of complications. Most common complications were hypertension (27%) and brief clinical seizures (16%), but also hypotension (10%), vomiting (7%), brief periods of apnea (4%), and agitation (6%) were observed. In 7% of the procedures, seizures required pharmacologic treatment. Fifty-nine percent of the asleep-asleep procedures [n=103, age 51 y (range: 21 to 76 y), ASA 1 (1 to 3), body mass index 25.4+/-3.9 kg/m, P<0.05 vs. asleep-awake] were free of complications. Clinical seizures were observed in 31% of the cases. The administration of boluses of hypnotics was rarely necessary (6%) and safer because of secured airways. CONCLUSIONS: With this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of our protocols on large prospective case series. Asleep-awake protocol can be safely used when intraoperative language mapping is planned, whereas an asleep-asleep protocol with secured airway might be preferred when motor testing only is required.

Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas.

OBJECTIVE: Subcortical stimulation can be used to identify functional language tracts during resection of gliomas located close to or within language areas or pathways. The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of the routine use of subcortical stimulation for identification of language tracts in a large series of patients with gliomas and to determine the influence that subcortical language tract identification exerted on the extent of surgery and on the appearance of immediate and definitive postoperative deficits. METHODS: Subcortical stimulation for language tract identification was systematically used during surgical removal of 88 gliomas (44 high-grade and 44 low-grade gliomas) involving language pathways. Procedures were performed during asleep/awake craniotomy. Subcortical stimulation was continuously alternated with surgical resection in a back-and-forth fashion. Language performances were tested by neuropsychological language evaluation preoperatively and at 3, 30, and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Language tracts were identified in 59% of patients, with differences according to tumor location but not according to histological grade. Language tract identification influenced the ability to reach a complete tumor removal in low-grade gliomas, in which tracts were documented inside the peripheral mass of the tumor. Identification of language tracts was associated with a higher occurrence of transient postoperative deficits (67.3% of cases), but a low occurrence of definitive morbidity (2.3% of cases). A pattern of typical language disturbances related to the phonological and semantic system can be identified according to tumor location, with preservation being important for the maintenance of language integrity. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the routine use of subcortical stimulation for language tract identification as a reliable tool for guiding surgical removal of gliomas in or in close proximity to language areas or pathways.

Intraoperative language localization in multilingual patients with gliomas.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative localization of speech is problematic in patients who are fluent in different languages. Previous studies have generated various results depending on the series of patients studied, the type of language, and the sensitivity of the tasks applied. It is not clear whether languages are mediated by multiple and separate cortical areas or shared by common areas. Globally considered, previous studies recommended performing a multiple intraoperative mapping for all the languages in which the patient is fluent. The aim of this work was to study the feasibility of performing an intraoperative multiple language mapping in a group of multilingual patients with a glioma undergoing awake craniotomy for tumor removal and to describe the intraoperative cortical and subcortical findings in the area of craniotomy, with the final goal to maximally preserve patients' functional language. METHODS: Seven late, highly proficient multilingual patients with a left frontal glioma were submitted preoperatively to a battery of tests to evaluate oral language production, comprehension, and repetition. Each language was tested serially starting from the first acquired language. Items that were correctly named during these tests were used to build personalized blocks to be used intraoperatively. Language mapping was undertaken during awake craniotomies by the use of an Ojemann cortical stimulator during counting and oral naming tasks. Subcortical stimulation by using the same current threshold was applied during tumor resection, in a back and forth fashion, and the same tests. RESULTS: Cortical sites essential for oral naming were found in 87.5% of patients, those for the first acquired language in one to four sites, those for the other languages in one to three sites. Sites for each language were distinct and separate. Number and location of sites were not predictable, being randomly and widely distributed in the cortex around or less frequently over the tumor area. Subcortical stimulations found tracts for the first acquired language in four patients and for the other languages in three patients. Three of these patients decreased their fluency immediately after surgery, affecting the first acquired language, which fully recovered in two patients and partially in one. The procedure was agile and well tolerated by the patients. CONCLUSION: These findings show that multiple cortical and subcortical language mapping during awake craniotomy for tumor removal is a feasible procedure. They support the concept that intraoperative mapping should be performed for all the languages in which the patient is fluent in to preserve functional integrity.