Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma in a Patient with Coeliac Disease: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder which leads to chronic inflammation of the gut. Furthermore, CD is associated with upper gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly lymphoma of the small intestine. Besides lymphoma, an increased frequency of associated small bowel carcinoma has been described. Here we report the case of a 70-year-old male suffering from CD who was treated with a gluten-free diet presenting with complaints of nausea, vomiting and weight loss of about 8 kg in two months. He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which identified distention of the stomach and duodenum and in the pars horizontalis a distinct obstruction was suggestive. However, histopathological examination showed a normal mucosal membrane. Additionally, a computed tomography scan of the abdomen was performed which showed an expanded stomach and duodenum up to the ligament of Treitz. During an explorative laparotomy a small tumor was palpated near the ligament of Treitz. Subsequently, a duodenal segment resection was performed. After surgery, the patient recovered well and left our hospital in good condition.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Historical data and recent studies show that standardised extended (D2) lymphadenectomy leads to better results than standardised limited (D1) lymphadenectomy. Based on these findings, the Dutch D1D2 trial, a nationwide prospectively randomised clinical trial, was undertaken to compare D2 with D1 lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable primary adenocarcinoma of the stomach. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of D2 compared with D1 surgery on disease recurrence and survival in patients treated with curative intent. METHODS: Between August, 1989, and July, 1993, patients were entered and randomised at 80 participating hospitals by means of a telephone call to the central data centre of the trial. The sequence of randomisation was in blocks of six with stratification for the participating centre. Eligibility criteria were a histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach without evidence of distance metastasis, age younger than 85 years, and adequate physical condition for D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients were excluded if they had previous or coexisting cancer or had undergone gastrectomy for benign tumours. Strict quality control measures for pathological assessment were implemented and monitored. Analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with the NCI trial register, as DUT-KWF-CKVO-8905, EU-90003. FINDINGS: A total of 1078 patients were entered in the study, of whom 996 were eligible. 711 patients underwent the randomly assigned treatment with curative intent (380 in the D1 group and 331 in the D2 group) and 285 had palliative treatment. Data were collected prospectively and all patients were followed up for a median time of 15.2 years (range 6.9-17.9 years). Analyses were done for the 711 patients treated with curative intent and were according to the allocated treatment group. Of the 711 patients, 174 (25%) were alive, all but one without recurrence. Overall 15-year survival was 21% (82 patients) for the D1 group and 29% (92 patients) for the D2 group (p=0.34). Gastric-cancer-related death rate was significantly higher in the D1 group (48%, 182 patients) compared with the D2 group (37%, 123 patients), whereas death due to other diseases was similar in both groups. Local recurrence was 22% (82 patients) in the D1 group versus 12% (40 patients) in D2, and regional recurrence was 19% (73 patients) in D1 versus 13% (43 patients) in D2. Patients who had the D2 procedure had a significantly higher operative mortality rate than those who had D1 (n=32 [10%] vs n=15 [4%]; 95% CI for the difference 2-9; p=0.004), higher complication rate (n=142 [43%] vs n=94 [25%]; 11-25; p<0.0001), and higher reoperation rate (n=59 [18%] vs n=30 [8%]; 5-15; p=0.00016). INTERPRETATION: After a median follow-up of 15 years, D2 lymphadenectomy is associated with lower locoregional recurrence and gastric-cancer-related death rates than D1 surgery. The D2 procedure was also associated with significantly higher postoperative mortality, morbidity, and reoperation rates. Because a safer, spleen-preserving D2 resection technique is currently available in high-volume centres, D2 lymphadenectomy is the recommended surgical approach for patients with resectable (curable) gastric cancer. FUNDING: Dutch Health Insurance Funds Council and The Netherlands Cancer Foundation.

Optimal surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

Locoregional control remains a major problem after surgery, although a curative resection is still the only treatment to offer a cure for patients with gastric cancer. Despite the results of major randomized trials, the extent of nodal dissection continues to be debated. If there is a survival benefit to be gained by extended lymphadenectomy, added operative mortality should be eliminated. A pancreas and spleen-preserving D2 lymphadenectomy provides superior staging information and may provide a survival benefit while avoiding its excess morbidity. Splenectomy during gastric resection for tumors not adjacent to or invading the spleen increases morbidity and mortality without improving survival. Therefore, splenectomy should not be performed unless there is direct tumor extension. The Maruyama Index and nomograms that predict disease-specific survival may help to discriminate between patients with a high risk of relapse and select those patients who will be most likely to benefit from tailored multimodality treatment. There is growing evidence that gastric cancer surgery should be performed in high-volume centers with experienced specialists to reduce morbidity and operative mortality and to achieve better survival results.

How does extended lymphadenectomy influence practical care for patients with gastric cancer?

The recurrence and survival rates in patients with curable gastric cancer remain suboptimal. Debate on the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for the surgical treatment of these patients is, therefore, still ongoing. A randomized, controlled trial by Sasako et al. has examined whether addition of para-aortic nodal dissection to D2 lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with gastric cancer. The study included 523 patients who were randomly assigned either D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy and para-aortic nodal dissection. The results from this trial, whose primary end point was overall survival, demonstrated no additional benefit of lymphadenectomy beyond D2 resection. Management strategies should focus on optimal lymphadenectomy in high-volume hospitals, with evaluation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, to achieve low surgery-related morbidity and mortality, optimal locoregional control and improved survival rates for patients with curable gastric cancer.