Belching in children: Prevalence and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Excessive belching is frequently reported in adult patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and dyspepsia. Although postprandial gastric belching (GB) is considered a physiological mechanism for gastric venting, supra-gastric belching (SGB) is considered a distinct behavioural disorder. We aimed to define the prevalence of different types of belching and its association with reflux disease in paediatric patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed reflux monitoring studies from 287 patients (median age: 7.0 years; interquartile range 3.0-11.3 years) with a suspicion of GORD. Based on oesophageal acid exposure time (AET) patients were divided in 3 groups: (a) physiological AET, (b) borderline AET and (c) pathological AET. MII-pH studies were manually edited and reflux disease parameters were measured together with quantification of GB and SGB. KEY RESULTS: Two hundred one children (70.0%) had physiological AET (median: 0.8; interquartile range 0.3-1.6), 52 (18.1%) had borderline AET (median: 4.2; interquartile range 3.4-5.3) and 34 (11.9%) had pathologic AET (median: 10.7; interquartile range 9.1-14.2). Gastric belching was observed in all studies. Gastric belching related reflux was more frequently observed in patients with borderline and pathological AET (p < 0.001). This was more common in older children. SGB were observed in only 7 (2.4%) children (age range: 8-17years) in our population and all patients had Physiological AET. Only 3 (1%) patients had pathological number of SGB (>13/24 h). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric belching related reflux is observed in children with increased AET. SGB is very rare in the paediatric population.

Identification of Different Phenotypes of Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity and Implications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reflux hypersensitivity (RH), a functional esophageal disorder, is detected in 14%-20% of patients who present with typical esophageal symptoms. As many as 40% of patients with RH do not respond to treatment with pain modulators or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); behavior disorders might contribute to lack of treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess the prevalence of behavioral disorders and their effects on typical reflux symptoms in patients with RH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 542 patients with PPI-refractory esophageal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, or chest pain) or with symptoms that responded to PPI therapy, evaluated for anti-reflux surgery from January 2016 through August 2019 at a single center in London, United Kingdom. We collected data on symptoms, motility, and impedance-pH monitoring and assigned patients to categories of RH (n = 116), functional heartburn (n = 126), or non-erosive reflux disease (n = 300). RESULTS: Of the 116 patients with a diagnosis of RH, 59 had only hypersensitivity, whereas 57 patients (49.2%) had either excessive supragastric belching (SGB, 39.7%), based on 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, or rumination (9.5%), based on postprandial manometry combined with impedance. The prevalence of SGB and rumination in patients with RH was significantly higher than in patients with functional heartburn (22%; P < .001). Patients with RH and rumination were significantly younger (P = .005) and had the largest number of non-acid reflux episodes (P = .023). In patients with RH with SGB, SGB episodes were associated with 40.6% of marked reflux symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, or chest pain), based on impedance-pH monitoring. In patients with RH and rumination, 40% of reflux-related symptoms (mostly regurgitation) were due to possible rumination episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of patients with a diagnosis of RH have behavior disorders, including excessive SGB or rumination. Episodes of SGB or rumination are associated with typical reflux symptoms. Segregation of patients with diagnosis of RH into those with vs without behavioral disorders might have important therapeutic implications.

Duration of adhesion of swallowed alginates to distal oesophageal mucosa: implications for topical therapy of oesophageal diseases.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown, ex vivo, that alginate solutions can have a topical protective effect on oesophageal mucosal biopsies exposed to simulated gastric juice. Oesophageal mucosal impedance can measure the duration of mucosal adherence of ionic solutions since the impedance drops when the solution is present, and rises to baseline as the solution clears. AIM: To investigate the in vivo duration of adhesion of swallowed alginate solution to distal oesophageal mucosa. METHODS: We studied 20 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with heartburn. A pH-impedance catheter was inserted, and baseline distal channel oesophageal impedance measured. Healthy volunteers received 10 mL of either sodium alginate (Gaviscon Advance), Gaviscon placebo (no alginate) or viscous slurry (saline mixed with sucralose), given in a randomised, single-blinded order over three visits. Patients received either sodium alginate or placebo on two visits. Initial impedance drop was measured, then 1-minute mean impedance was measured each minute until ≥75% recovery to baseline. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, sodium alginate adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for longer than placebo or viscous slurry (10.4 [8.7] minutes vs 1.1 [1.6] vs 3.6 [4.0], P < 0.01). In patients, sodium alginate adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for longer than placebo (9.0 (5.4) vs 3.7 (4.1), P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Sodium alginate solution adhered to the oesophageal mucosa for significantly longer than placebo or viscous slurry. This demonstrates that alginates could confer a protective benefit due to mucoadhesion and can be a basis for further development of topical protectants and for topical drug delivery in oesophageal disease.

Measurement of Esophageal Nocturnal Baseline Impedance: A Simplified Method.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) during multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (MII-pH) reflects the status of esophageal mucosal integrity. MNBI is suggested as an adjunctive method to distinguish patients with true gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from functional heartburn (FH) and might predict outcomes for anti-reflux treatment. However, current methodology for calculation of MNBI is time-consuming and subject to operator-dependent selection bias. We aim to simplify and provide a more objective method to calculate MNBI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 MII-pH tracings from 20 patients with erosive reflux disease, 20 with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 20 with reflux hypersensitivity, 20 with functional heartburn (FH), and 20 healthy asymptomatic volunteers. We compared the current "conventional" MNBI analysis with our "simple" MNBI analysis measured by selecting the whole supine period using the impedance average calculation function in the MII-pH software. RESULTS: Absolute values were very similar and there was a strong correlation between conventional and simple MNBI values in the most distal channel in all groups (r ≥ 0.8, P < 0.001) including patients with increased supine acid reflux. Distal esophageal simple MNBI negatively correlated with acid exposure time (r = -0.695, P < 0.001). Patients with erosive reflux disease and NERD had lower simple MNBI values in the most distal channel compared to other groups (P < 0.001). With a cutoff value of 1785 ohms, simple MNBI can discriminate patients with GERD from those with reflux hypersensitivity and FH (sensitivity 80.0% and specificity 89.7%). CONCLUSION: Simple MNBI analysis provides very similar values and has an excellent correlation with conventional MNBI analysis.

Exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors is not associated with increased esophageal acid exposure.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on patients with reflux symptoms can be challenging, as symptoms often exacerbate after stopping. The mechanism remains unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of stopping long-term PPIs on patients with heartburn, and its association with esophageal acid exposure. METHODS: Patients with heartburn on long-term PPIs underwent symptom questionnaire, high-resolution manometry, and 24h ambulatory impedance-pH studies, following a 7-day PPIs discontinuation. We investigated the association between exacerbation of symptoms and findings on ambulatory reflux studies. KEY RESULTS: We studied 37 patients. After stopping PPIs, 27 patients (73%) had exacerbation of heartburn. Esophageal acid exposure time% (AET) in patients with exacerbation of heartburn was not significantly higher than in patients without (3.5% [1.3-9.7] vs 2.5% [1.3-8.7], NS). Fourteen of 27 patients with exacerbation had physiological AET (<4%) as compared with 6 of 10 patients with physiological AET (NS). All questioned symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric discomfort/pain, bloating/belch) worsened after stopping PPIs (NS). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Exacerbation of heartburn after discontinuation of PPIs does not appear to be due to increased esophageal acid exposure.

Persistent Postprandial Regurgitation vs Rumination in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: Identification of a Distinct Rumination Pattern Using Ambulatory Impedance-pH Monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: Up to 20% of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) might have postprandial rumination. The aim of this study was to distinguish persistent GERD-related postprandial regurgitation from rumination in patients with refractory GERD undergoing ambulatory multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. METHODS: We first characterized 24-hour and postprandial MII-pH patterns in 28 consecutive patients with confirmed rumination syndrome (positive clinical and high-resolution manometry/impedance). We compared such MII-pH patterns with those from 30 patients with typical GERD symptoms (10 nonerosive reflux disease, 10 hyperactive esophagus, and 10 functional heartburn) and 27 healthy controls. Using ROC curves, we selected the best MII-pH parameters to prepare an MII-pH rumination score. We prospectively tested the performance of the new MII-pH rumination score in 26 consecutive patients with refractory GERD (predominant regurgitation). RESULTS: Compared with GERD controls, patients with rumination were more often females, younger, and had significantly more postprandial early nonacid reflux episodes with high proximal extent. Postprandial reflux in ruminators had a distinct nadir pH profile over time (from nonacid to acid). Despite increased reflux events, baseline impedance in ruminators was similar to that in healthy subjects. Ruminators marked postprandial symptoms earlier and much more often than patients with GERD. An MII-pH-based rumination score (using postprandial nonacid reflux/hour and Symptom Index) diagnosed rumination in 46% of patients with refractory GERD and persistent regurgitation (sensitivity 91.7% and specificity 78.6%). DISCUSSION: Postprandial rumination is very common in refractory GERD with persistent regurgitation. A simple MII-pH score detects rumination in these patients with high sensitivity and specificity.

200 mL Rapid Drink Challenge During High-resolution Manometry Best Predicts Objective Esophagogastric Junction Obstruction and Correlates With Symptom Severity.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Single swallow integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high-resolution manometry (HRM) does not always accurately predict esophagogastric outflow obstruction on timed barium esophagogram (TBE). Furthermore, neither single swallow IRP or TBE is reliable in predicting symptoms, particularly after treatment with dilatation or myotomy. A 200 mL rapid drink challenge (RDC) has been proposed as an adjunctive test during HRM. This serves as a "stress-test" to the esophagogastric junction, and may yield clinically useful parameters. We aim to assess HRM parameters during RDC, and their ability to predict outflow obstruction on TBE in patients with dysphagia, and to correlate with symptoms in patients' achalasia. METHODS: Thirty patients with dysphagia were recruited. All underwent standard single swallow HRM analysis, 200 mL RDC, then TBE. RDC parameters, including esophagogastric pressure gradient, IRP, and RDC duration were evaluated. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the best predictive parameter for obstruction on TBE. A further 21 patients with achalasia were evaluated with Eckhardt score, single swallow HRM, RDC, and TBE. Parameter correlation with Eckhardt score was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean IRP during RDC was the best HRM parameter at predicting outflow obstruction on TBE. This performed much better in untreated patients (sensitivity 100% and specificity 85.5%) than in previously treated patients (sensitivity 50% and specificity 66%). In patients with achalasia, mean IRP during RDC was the only parameter that correlated with symptom score. CONCLUSION: Mean IRP during RDC appears to be a clinically useful "stress test" to the esophagogastric junction during HRM.