Changes in periodontal parameters of splinted versus non-splinted posterior teeth during ten years of supportive periodontal therapy - A retrospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare periodontal parameters of splinted posterior teeth versus control teeth over ten years of supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and to assess the survival rate of splints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective data of 372 SPT-patients was screened for splints (composite/fiberglass-reinforced composite) in the posterior (molars/premolars) which were inserted at least ten years before due to increased tooth mobility. For each splinted tooth (test), a corresponding control tooth had to be present at the first SPT-session after splint insertion (T1). Data was assessed at T1 and ten years later (T2). Possible influencing covariates for splint survival (mobility degree/Eichner class) were tested by Cox regression. The change in clinical attachment level (ΔCAL), probing pocket depth (ΔPPD) and the testing of possible influencing covariates was analyzed by using mixed linear regression. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (32 splints, 58 splinted teeth) were included. Ten test and two control teeth were lost. No differences were observed between ΔCAL and ΔPPD of test teeth compared to control teeth (ΔCAL -0.38 ± 1.90 vs. 0.20 ± 1.27 mm; ΔPPD -0.17 ± 1.18 vs. 0.10 ± 1.05 mm). Twenty-two splints fractured during the observation period (survival-rate: 31%). Mobility degree and Eichner class did not influence time until fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Splinting of periodontally compromised and mobile posterior teeth does not have any disadvantage regarding the clinical periodontal situation when regular SPT is applied. However, splint fractures occur very often. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Splinting of posterior teeth is a treatment option in addition to active periodontal therapy when patients are disturbed by tooth mobility but splints have a high susceptibility to fracture.

Remote assessment of dental records by using intraoral scan-based digital three-dimensional models in an elderly patient population - an exploratory study.

AIM: To assess the agreement rates of dental records derived from intraoral scan-based digital three-dimensional models (3DM) and 3DM + panoramic radiographs (3DM+PAN-X) compared to clinical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the 3DM/3DM+PAN-X of 50 patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), ten remote raters (inexperienced in using IOS or 3DM) assessed for each site of the dental scheme (32 sites) whether a tooth was missing (M), filled (F), restoration- and caries-free (H), replaced by an implant (I) or decayed (D). Remote records were compared to the clinical reference record of each patient at tooth-level. The clinical records were assessed by an experienced dentist who supplemented the clinical findings with information from available radiographs and the patient records to define the clinical reference record. RESULTS: The agreement-rates for 3DM/3DM+PAN-X at tooth-level are: M: 93%/94%, F: 84%/88%, H: 92%/92%, I: 65%/96%, D: 29%/29%. The overall agreement-rate is 88% for the 3DM-based dental records (14093 of 16000 entries true) and 91% for 3DM+PAN-X (14499 of 16000 entries true). Using 3DM for dental record assessment, posterior teeth had higher odds of correct findings compared to anterior teeth (upper jaw OR=2.34, lower jaw OR=1.27). CONCLUSIONS: The remote detection of healthy, missing and filled teeth and implants by raters inexperienced in using IOS or 3DM shows a high agreement-rate with the clinical findings. The additional evaluation of PAN-X increased the agreement-rate significantly for implants. Thus, the remote assessment of dental records using 3DM+PAN-X has a high accuracy when applied in SPT-patients with low caries activity.

Long-term stability of infrabony defects treated with enamel matrix derivative alone: A retrospective two-centre cohort study.

AIM: To assess the long-term stability of attachment gain in infrabony defects (IBDs) 10 years after regenerative treatment with an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two centres (Frankfurt [F] and Heidelberg [HD]) invited patients for re-examination 120 ± 12 months after regenerative therapy. Re-examination included clinical examination (periodontal probing depths (PPD), vertical clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI), plaque control record, gingival bleeding index and periodontal risk assessment) and review of patient charts (number of supportive periodontal care [SPC] visits). RESULTS: Both centres included 52 patients (29 female; median baseline age: 52.0 years; lower/upper quartile: 45.0/58.8 years; eight smokers), each contributing one IBD. Nine teeth were lost. For the remaining 43 teeth, regenerative therapy showed significant CAL gain after 1 year (3.0; 2.0/4.4 mm; p < .001) and 10 years (3.0; 1.5/4.1 mm; p < .001) during which CAL remained stable (-0.5; -1.0/1.0 mm; p = 1.000) after an average SPC of 9 years. Mixed-model regression analyses revealed a positive association of CAL gain from 1 to 10 years with CAL 12 months post operation (logistic: p = .01) as well as a higher probability for CAL loss with an increasing vertical extent of a three-walled defect component (linear: p = .008). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed a positive association between PlI after 12 months and tooth loss (p = .046). CONCLUSION: Regenerative therapy of IBDs showed stable results over 9 years. CAL gain is associated with CAL after 12 months and decreasing initial defect depth in a three-walled defect morphology. Tooth loss is associated with PlI 12 months post operation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: DRKS00021148 (URL: https://drks.de).

Remote assessment of DMFT and number of implants with intraoral digital photography in an elderly patient population - a comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: This comparative study aimed to evaluate intraoral digital photography (IODP) as assessment-tool for DMFT and number of implants (IMPL) compared to clinical diagnosis (CLIN) in an elderly population with high restorative status. Secondary research questions were whether an additional evaluation of panoramic radiographs (PAN-X) or raters' clinical experience influence the agreement. METHODS: Fifty patients (70.98±7.60 years) were enrolled for standardized CLIN and IODP. The clinical reference examiner and ten blinded raters evaluated the photographs without and with a PAN-X regarding DMFT and IMPL. CLIN were used as reference standard and differences to IODP and IODP-PAN-X findings were analysed descriptively. To assess intra-rater agreement, pairwise Gwet's AC1s of the three diagnostic methods CLIN, IODP and IODP+PAN-X were calculated. RESULTS: Compared to a DMFT of 22.10±3.75 (CLIN), blinded raters evaluated a DMFT of 21.54±3.40 (IODP) and 22.12±3.45 (IODP+PAN-X). Mean values for "Decayed" were 0.18±0.52 (CLIN), 0.45±0.46 (IODP) and 0.48±0.47 (IODP-PAN-X), while 11.02±5.97 (CLIN), 10.66±5.78 (IODP) and 10.93±5.91 (IODP+PAN-X) were determined for "Missing" and 10.90±5.61 (CLIN), 10.43±4.85 (IODP) and 10.71±5.11 (IODP+PAN-X) for "Filled". IMPL were 0.78±2.04 (CLIN), 0.58±1.43 (IODP), 0.78±2.04 (IODP+PAN-X). Gwet's AC1 using the mode of the blinded raters' assessment of "Decayed", "Missing" and IMPL compared to CLIN ranged from 0.81 to 0.89 (IODP) and 0.87 to 1.00 (IODP+PAN-X), while for "Filled" and DMFT they were 0.29 and 0.36 (IODP) as well as 0.33 and 0.36 (IODP+PAN-X), respectively. Clinical experience did not influence the agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of "Decayed", "Missing" and IMPL by IODP showed almost perfect agreement, whereas of "Filled" and DMFT revealed fair to moderate agreement with clinical findings. Additional PAN-X-evaluation increased agreement compared to IODP-diagnostics alone. IODP for the assessment of DMFT and IMPL might be a suitable method in large-scale epidemiological studies, considering high agreement in total values and miscellaneous agreement at patient-level.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral health and psychosocial factors.

The objective of this study was to investigate oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in times of the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine a possible association to psychosocial factors like psychological stress and symptoms of depression and anxiety disorders. Secondary research questions were whether people changed oral hygiene regimens during the COVID-19 pandemic and to what extent dental symptoms existed and developed compared to pre-pandemic. For this cross-sectional study a survey has been conceptualized to determine OHRQoL, stress, depression and anxiety and their specific confounders in a German cohort. Validated questionnaires as OHIP-G14, PHQ-Stress and PHQ-4 have been implemented. Altogether 1178 participants completed the survey between May and August 2020. The overall OHIP-G14 sum score of 4.8 ± 7.5 indicated good OHRQoL. 21% of the participants (n = 248) reported toothache, 23% (n = 270) mucosal problems, 31% (n = 356) hypersensitivity of the teeth and 27% (n = 305) myofacial pain. The PHQ-Stress score (4.5 ± 3.5) demonstrated a mild severity of stress. Depression and anxiety level has been mild to moderate (PHQ-4 score: 2.4 ± 2.6). 38% of the participants stated subjectively greater emotional burden compared to pre-pandemic. Statistically significant differences exist for OHRQoL, stress, anxiety and depression levels between participants with greater, equal or less emotional burden compared to pre-pandemic. COVID-19 history and aggravated levels of depression, anxiety, and stress seem to associate with lower OHRQoL. Psychosocial consequences during pandemic times and their association to oral health should be further investigated.

The impact of splinting timepoint of mobile mandibular incisors on the outcome of periodontal treatment-preliminary observations from a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of periodontal parameters in mobile mandibular incisors which were splinted before or after full-mouth disinfection (FMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four periodontitis patients with ≥ 1 mobile mandibular incisor (mobility degree II/III, clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 5 mm, relative bone loss ≥ 50%) were randomly allocated to group A or B. Patients received periodontal treatment (PT) including splinting of teeth 33-43 before (A) or after FMD (B). Patient (age/sex/smoking status/systemic diseases/number of teeth) and tooth-related parameters (mean probing pocket depth (PPD)/CAL/oral hygiene indices; for the overall dentition and region 33-43) were assessed prior to PT and 12 months after FMD by a blinded examiner. Therapy-related information was added (group/antibiotic therapy/surgical intervention). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (A: 12; B:14) were re-examined. Two patients of group B did not need splinting after FMD because of reduction in mobility after FMD. Regression analysis revealed a positive association of antibiotic therapy with CAL_overall, PPD_overall, and PPD_33-43 (p ≤ 0.01). There is a trend toward a higher reduction of periodontal parameters at teeth 33-43 in group A (PPD_33-43: - 0.91 vs. - 0.27 mm; CAL_33-43: - 1.02 vs. - 0.47 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Teeth splinted before or after FMD show a significant improvement in periodontal parameters 12 months after FMD. Splinting after FMD offered the option to detect reduction in mobility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite a higher, but not statistically significant, improvement in periodontal parameters on teeth splinted before FMD, the results do not indicate which timepoint of splinting is more beneficial. The decision for the therapeutic procedure should therefore be made individually.

The impact of splinting mobile mandibular incisors on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life-Preliminary observations from a randomized clinical trial.

AIM: To compare the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) of patients with mobile mandibular incisors before and after full-mouth disinfection (FMD) with and without splinting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four periodontitis patients with ≥1 mobile mandibular incisor (degree II/III) were randomly allocated to the test or control group. All patients received FMD and the test group additional splinting of teeth 33-43. OHRQoL was assessed before (BL) and 3 months after FMD (RE) using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14. Data were compared within and between the groups (Wilcoxon test/Mann-Whitney U test). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (13 test group/15 control group) were re-evaluated. FMD led to a reduction of the mean probing pocket depth (PPD; in mm) (test group: BL-PPD 3.89 ± 1.03, RE-PPD 2.82 ± 0.53; control group: BL-PPD 3.58 ± 0.66, RE-PPD 2.77 ± 0.59; each p ≤ .001), the mean clinical attachment level (CAL; in mm) (test group: BL-CAL 5.22 ± 1.38, RE-CAL 4.79 ± 0.85; control group: BL-CAL 4.58 ± 1.10, RE-CAL 4.41 ± 0.96; each p ≤ .05), and the mean OHIP-14 summary scores (test group: BL-OHIP 21.7 ± 11.06, RE-OHIP 9.9 ± 8.96, p = .0046; control group: BL-OHIP 16.8 ± 8.27, RE-OHIP 11.7 ± 8.55; p = .0217). The reduction of the OHIP-G14 scores was considerably higher in the test group but statistically not significant (p = .080). CONCLUSIONS: The results show a positive impact of non-surgical periodontal treatment on OHRQoL and a possible tendency for further improvement by splinting mobile mandibular incisors.

Changes of clinical parameters at implants: A retrospective comparison of implants versus natural teeth over 5 years of supportive periodontal therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical parameters of implants versus natural teeth over a period of 5 years during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 421 SPT patients were screened for implants (I) and corresponding control teeth (C). Data (patient level [P ]: sex, age, smoking status, systemic diseases, adherence, oral hygiene indices, mean probing depth [PD]P , bleeding on probing [BOP]P , periodontal risk profile; implant/control tooth level [I/C ]: PDI/C , BOPI/C ; site level at implants [SITE ]: position, dental arch, aspect, BOPSITE ) were assessed at the first SPT session where the implant was probed (T1) and 5 years later (T2). The influence of patient and implant/control-related factors on PDI/C /BOPI/C was tested (linear mixed model) as well as the influence of site-specific factors on the PDSITE change (multilevel regression). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (151 implants) were included. Mean PDI was 2.75 ± 0.85 mm (T1) and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm (T2). Mean PDC was 2.42 ± 0.66 mm (T1) and 2.49 ± 0.71 mm (T2). BOPI increased from 8.62 ± 15.01% (T1) to 24.06 ± 26.79% (T2) and BOPC from 9.97 ± 17.78% (T1) to 15.52 ± 22.69% (T2). The differences between implants and controls were significant for BOP (p = .0032). At T2, BOPI/C was associated with periodontal risk (p = .0351). The site-specific analysis revealed an association of BOPSITE at T1 with the progression of PDSITE (p = .0058). CONCLUSIONS: Probing depths of implants and controls seem to change similarly during SPT but retention of inflammation-free conditions at implants appears to be more difficult compared to natural teeth. Patients with a high-risk profile appear to have an increased susceptibility for BOP around implants, and BOP at implants seems to be a predictor for further PD increase.

Adherence to long-term supportive periodontal therapy in groups with different periodontal risk profiles.

AIM: To examine changes of the periodontal risk assessment (PRA) of patients during long-term supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and to examine the adherence to recommended visit intervals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective data from 372 SPT patients were evaluated before and after active periodontal therapy (APT) and at least 5 years later. After APT and regularly during SPT, PRA was performed for all included patients (low-risk/moderate-risk/high-risk profile) and they were advised to adhere to 3/6-/or 12-month intervals accordingly. The adherence (fully/partially/insufficiently/non-adherent) to SPT intervals was assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: Initially, 38 patients had a low-risk, 217 a moderate-risk and 94 a high-risk profile. Five years after APT, 55.3% of the low-risk, 71.9% of the moderate-risk and 54.3% of the high-risk patients had not changed their initial risk. 19.5% of the moderate-risk group shifted to "high-risk" and 8.6% to "low-risk". 66% of low-risk, 34% of moderate-risk and 13% of high-risk patients fully adhered to SPT. The portion of non-adherent patients was the highest within the high-risk group (18%-43%). The level of adherence was associated with number of lost teeth and mean PPD (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Risk profiles can change during SPT. A high level of adherence to SPT intervals based on PRA positively influences the periodontal status.

Oral health-related quality of life in patients under supportive periodontal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the oral health-related quality of life (OH-QoL) in patients under supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) and the influence of the individual periodontal risk as well as different degrees of adherence during SPT on OH-QoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 309 patients with at least 5 years of SPT were re-examined. Periodontal risk profile (according to Lang and Tonetti) was assessed and the adherence to SPT-appointments within the last 30(±6) months was reviewed for each patient (fully adherent: adherence to all appointments ±6 weeks, partially adherent: SPT-interval not extended more than half of the recommended interval, insufficiently adherent: SPT-interval extended more than half of the recommended interval, non-adherent: recommended SPT-interval interruption ≥12 months). OH-QoL was measured using the German short-version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-G14). Differences between groups (Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test), association between total OHIP-scores and the predictors age, mean periodontal probing depth and oral hygiene parameters were tested (Spearman's correlation). A multivariable linear regression model was fitted using all categorical predictors with a univariable p value <.1. RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in OHIP-G14 scores for gender, periodontal diagnosis and prosthetic status. Patients with deep periodontal pockets (≥6 mm) showed significantly higher OHIP-G14 scores compared to patients without deep pockets (p = .049). Adherence and periodontal surgery were statistically significant predictors for the OHIP-G14 score. CONCLUSIONS: OH-QoL of patients under long-term SPT seems to be influenced by periodontal status. Good compliance with SPT-intervals based on the individual periodontal risk profile seems to contribute to a better OH-QoL compared to irregular attendance of SPT.

Long-term stability of splinted anterior mandibular teeth during supportive periodontal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to retrospectively assess the survival rate and stability of periodontally compromised and mobile anterior mandibular teeth after splinting in patients under supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with splinted anterior mandibular teeth and SPT (≥1 visit/year) for 3-15 years were re-examined. Periodontal status, patient and tooth-related factors were assessed retrospectively before (baseline) and 3 years after splinting (n = 39 patients, 162 splinted teeth). For patients with splints inserted for more than 3 years, retrospective data after 5 (n = 30), 7 (n = 24), 10 (n = 16), 12 (n = 8) and 15 years (n = 4) was included, if available. At baseline, splinted teeth included at least one tooth with increased mobility combined with clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥ 5 mm and ≥50% relative bone loss (RBL). Baseline RBL of splinted teeth was assessed for all patients. Change in RBL was assessed after 10 years, if available. RESULTS: No splinted tooth was lost within the first 3 years after splinting. One splinted tooth was lost 7 years after baseline and one 12 years after baseline. After 3 years mean(SD) periodontal probing depth of splinted teeth decreased from 3.39(1.41) mm to 2.12(0.37) mm and mean(SD) CAL from 5.61(1.66) mm to 5.09(1.67) mm and remained stable over the observation period. No change in RBL was observed over a 10-year period (p = .213). The survival rate of the splints until fracture or debonding was 74.4% after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Periodontally compromised splinted teeth show a high survival-rate and periodontal stability during SPT.

Local inflammatory reactions in patients with diabetes and periodontitis.

The impact of diabetes mellitus on the prevalence, severity and progression of periodontal disease has been known for many years and intense efforts have been made to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. It is widely reported that hyperglycemia causes numerous systemic changes, including altered innate immune-cell function and metabolic changes. The aim of this review was to summarize and discuss the evidence for mechanisms that probably play a role in the altered local inflammatory reactions in the periodontium of patients with diabetes, focusing on local changes in cytokine levels, matrix metalloproteinases, reactive oxygen species, advanced glycation end-products, immune-cell functions, the RANKL/osteoprotegerin axis and toll-like receptors. Apart from the systemic effects of diabetes, recent evidence suggests that local changes in the periodontal tissues are characterized by enhanced interactions between leukocytes and endothelial cells and by altered leukocyte functions [resulting in increased levels of reactive oxygen species and of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α)]. These local changes are amplified by the enhanced accumulation of advanced glycation end-products and their interaction with receptors for advanced glycation end-products. Furthermore, the increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines lead to an up-regulation of RANKL in periodontal tissues, stimulating further periodontal tissue breakdown.