Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Hautarzt ; 69(6): 449-461, 2018 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721626

ABSTRACT

The dermatologist's procedure is a pivotal tool for early recognition of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD), for reporting OCD cases to the statutory accident insurance and for treating the diseases. The employer is in charge of implementing skin protection measures at the workplace. However, in terms of an individual prevention approach it may be necessary to propose targeted skin protection recommendations in specific patient cases. The patient's own skin protection behavior significantly contributes to regenerating and maintaining healthy skin. This behavior includes the use of occupational skin products, and in particular the correct use of appropriately selected protective gloves. Protective gloves are the most important personal protective measure in the prevention of OCD. Prevention services, occupational health and safety specialists, occupational physicians and centers specialized in occupational dermatology can support the identification of suitable protective measures. Nowadays, suitable protective gloves exist for (almost) every occupational activity and exposure. However, improper use in practice can become a risk factor by itself for the skin (e. g., incorrectly used gloves). Therefore, it is of utmost importance to identify application errors, to educate patients in terms of skin protection and to motivate them to perform an appropriate skin protection behavior. With particular focus on protective gloves, this article gives an overview of various types, materials and potentially glove-related allergens, presents strategies for reducing occlusion effects and discusses some typical application errors and solutions.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational , Dermatology , Occupational Exposure , Gloves, Protective , Humans , Insurance, Liability , Risk Factors
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(3): 449-458, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055149

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational skin diseases (OSD) have a high medical, social, economic and political impact. Knowledge dissemination from research activities to key stakeholders involved in health care is a prerequisite to make prevention effective. OBJECTIVES: To study and prioritize different activity fields and stakeholders that are involved in the prevention of OSD, to reflect on their inter-relationships, to develop a strategic approach for knowledge dissemination and to develop a hands-on tool for OSD prevention projects METHODS: Seven different activity fields that are relevant in the prevention of OSD have been stepwise identified. This was followed by an impact analysis. Fifty-five international OSD experts rated the impact and the influence of the activity fields for the prevention of OSD with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Activity fields identified to have a high impact in OSD prevention are the political system, mass media and industry. The political system has a strong but more indirect effect on the general population via the educational system, local public health services or the industry. The educational system, mass media, industry and local public health services have a strong direct impact on the OSD 'at risk' worker. Finally, a hands-on tool for future OSD prevention projects has been developed that addresses knowledge dissemination and different stakeholder needs. CONCLUSION: Systematic knowledge dissemination is important to make OSD prevention more effective and to close the gap between research and practice. This study provides guidance to identify stakeholders, strategies and dissemination channels for systematic knowledge dissemination which need to be adapted to country-specific structures, for example the social security system and healthcare systems. A key for successful knowledge dissemination is building linkages among different stakeholders, building strategic partnerships and gaining their support right from the inception phase of a project.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Information Dissemination/methods , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Skin Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Interdisciplinary Research , Mass Media , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translational Research, Biomedical
3.
Skin Res Technol ; 20(2): 239-45, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24003846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Skin cleansers for occupational use are manufactured for different types and degrees of soiling without common, legally binding requirements for product testing. This leads to different, manufacturer-specific test methods and a lack of comparable information on skin cleansing products. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to validate a newly developed standardized automated cleansing device (ACiD) for in vivo evaluation of industrial skin cleansers. METHODS: Two ACiD were tested regarding the intra- and inter-device specific reproducibility of test results. RESULTS: Skin cleansing process carried out by the three independent washing modules which constitute an ACiD-unit and two separate ACiD-units led to highly comparable results. There was no significant difference between the washing modules or between the two separate ACiD-units detected. Only different parameter settings resulted in significantly different detergency. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-device specific test results of an in vivo model of skin cleansing using the automated cleansing device (ACiD) were reproducible. The long-term aim is a standardized classification of occupational skin cleansing products comparing their skin cleansing effectiveness in relation to their skin irritancy. This might then provide the basis for a rational specific product selection by consumers and may be used as a tool for future product development by manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Detergents/adverse effects , Hair/drug effects , Skin Tests/instrumentation , Skin Tests/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Adult , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Germany , Guidelines as Topic , Hair/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards
4.
Skin Res Technol ; 20(2): 228-38, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24138130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no legally binding requirements concerning product testing in cosmetics. This leads to various manufacturer-specific test methods and absent transparent information on skin cleansing products. A standardized in vivo test procedure for assessment of cleansing efficacy and corresponding barrier impairment by the cleaning process is needed, especially in the occupational context where repeated hand washing procedures may be performed at short intervals. METHODS: For the standardization of the cleansing procedure, an Automated Cleansing Device (ACiD) was designed and evaluated. Different smooth washing surfaces of the equipment for ACiD (incl. goat hair, felt, felt covered with nitrile caps) were evaluated regarding their skin compatibility. RESULTS: ACiD allows an automated, fully standardized skin washing procedure. Felt covered with nitrile as washing surface of the rotating washing units leads to a homogenous cleansing result and does not cause detectable skin irritation, neither clinically nor as assessed by skin bioengineering methods (transepidermal water loss, chromametry). CONCLUSIONS: Automated Cleansing Device may be useful for standardized evaluation of the cleansing effectiveness and parallel assessment of the corresponding irritancy potential of industrial skin cleansers. This will allow objectifying efficacy and safety of industrial skin cleansers, thus enabling market transparency and facilitating rational choice of products.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics/chemistry , Detergents/chemistry , Hair/drug effects , Skin Tests/instrumentation , Skin Tests/standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards , Animals , Cosmetics/administration & dosage , Cosmetics/analysis , Detergents/analysis , Detergents/pharmacology , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Germany , Goats , Guidelines as Topic , Hair/chemistry , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...