Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Protein Pept Sci ; 19(2): 145-154, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28901250

ABSTRACT

X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1) is a key regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is activated in response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Cells contain two protein isoforms of XBP-1, the active isoform (XBP-1S) and the inactive isoform (XBP-1U). Induction of UPR leads to the generation of XBP-1S while XBP-1U is dominant in ER stress-free cells. XBP-1S is a transcriptional activator and regulates the expression of a subset of UPR genes. Importantly, recent studies have demonstrated the essential role of XBP-1S in various human diseases, such as viral infections. Many viruses have evolved to manipulate UPR/XBP-1 of the infected cells to promote viral survival and replication. In this review, we will summarize the current findings on the involvement of XBP-1 in viral infection/ replication and discuss the potential anti-viral strategies by targeting XBP-1.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , X-Box Binding Protein 1/metabolism , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress , Humans , Protein Folding , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Unfolded Protein Response , Virus Diseases/metabolism , Virus Diseases/virology , Virus Replication
2.
Mol Biotechnol ; 59(8): 315-322, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28664508

ABSTRACT

Role of epigenetic regulation in the control of gene expression is well established. The impact of several epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, on recombinant protein production in mammalian cells has been investigated recently. Here we investigate the correlation between the selected epigenetic markers and five trastuzumab biosimilar-producing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines in which the expression of trastuzumab is driven by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) major immediate-early (MIE) promoter. We chose the producing clones in which transcription was the determinative step for the production of recombinant trastuzumab. We found that the abundance of trimethylation of histone 3 at lysine 4 (H3K4Me3) on the enhancer of HCMV MIE promoter correlated well with the relative titers of recombinant trastuzumab among the clones. Such close correlation was not observed between the recombinant protein and other epigenetic markers examined in our study. Our results demonstrate that the HCMV MIE enhancer-bound H3K4Me3 epigenetic marker may be used as the epigenetic indicator to predict the relative production of recombinant proteins between the producing CHO cell lines.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Genes, Immediate-Early , Histones/metabolism , Lysine/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Trastuzumab/metabolism , Animals , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , DNA Methylation , Gene Dosage , Humans , Methylation , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Trastuzumab/biosynthesis , Trastuzumab/genetics
3.
BMC Biotechnol ; 16(1): 71, 2016 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27756290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methylated CpG dinucleotides in promoters are associated with the loss of gene expression in recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during large-scale commercial manufacturing. We evaluated a promoter devoid of CpG dinucleotides, CpGfree, in parallel with a similar CpG containing promoter, CpGrich, for their ability to maintain the expression of recombinant enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) after 8 weeks of culturing. RESULTS: While the promoters gave similar transient expression levels, CpGfree clones had significantly higher average stable expression possibly due to increased resistance to early silencing during integration into the chromosome. A greater proportion of cells in clones generated using the CpGfree promoter were still expressing detectable levels of EGFP after 8 weeks but the relative expression levels measured at week 8 to those measured at week 0 did not improve compared to clones generated using the CpGrich promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that the repression of the CpGfree promoter was likely linked to histone deacetylation and methylation. Use of histone deacetylase inhibitors also managed to recover some of the lost expression. CONCLUSION: Using a promoter without CpG dinucleotides could mitigate the early gene silencing but did not improve longer-term expression stability as silencing due to histone modifications could still take place. The results presented here would aid in promoter selection and design for improved protein production in CHO and other mammalian cells.


Subject(s)
CpG Islands/genetics , Genetic Enhancement/methods , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Animals , CHO Cells , Cricetulus , Drug Stability , Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification
4.
Oncotarget ; 6(1): 271-87, 2015 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25426559

ABSTRACT

Cellular unfolded protein response (UPR) is induced when endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is under stress. XBP-1S, the active isoform of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1), is a key regulator of UPR. Previously, we showed that a histone acetyltransferase (HAT), p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF), binds to XBP-1S and functions as an activator of XBP-1S. Here, we identify general control nonderepressible 5 (GCN5), a HAT with 73% identity to PCAF, as a novel XBP-1S regulator. Both PCAF and GCN5 bind to the same domain of XBP-1S. Surprisingly, GCN5 potently blocks the XBP-1S-mediated transcription, including cellular UPR genes and latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus. Unlike PCAF, GCN5 acetylates XBP-1S and enhances nuclear retention and protein stability of XBP-1S. However, such GCN5-mediated acetylation of XBP-1S shows no effects on XBP-1S activity. In addition, the HAT activity of GCN5 is not required for repression of XBP-1S target genes. We further demonstrate that GCN5 inhibits XBP-1S-mediated transcription by disrupting the PCAF-XBP-1S interaction and preventing the recruitment of XBP-1S to its target genes. Taken together, our results represent the first work demonstrating that GCN5 and PCAF exhibit different functions and antagonistically regulate the XBP-1S-mediated transcription.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/biosynthesis , Transcription Factors/biosynthesis , Transcriptional Activation/physiology , p300-CBP Transcription Factors/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Humans , Immunoprecipitation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Regulatory Factor X Transcription Factors , Transcription, Genetic , Transfection , X-Box Binding Protein 1
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...