Contemporary outcomes of precision banding for high flow hemodialysis access.

OBJECTIVE: High-flow hemodialysis accesses are a well-recognized source of patient morbidity. Among available management strategies inflow constriction based on real-time physiologic flow monitoring offers a technically straightforward data-driven approach with potentially low morbidity. Despite the benefits offered by this approach, large contemporary series are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained clinical database was undertaken to capture patients undergoing precision banding within a signal tertiary care institution between 2010 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of thrombosis within 30 days and re-banding within 1 year were performed. RESULTS: In total, 297 patients underwent banding during the study period for a total number of 398 encounters. Median [IQR] follow-up was 157 [52-373] days. Most accesses were upper arm with brachial artery inflow (84%) and half of the banding procedures were performed for flow imbalance based on exam, duplex, or fistulogram. Median flow rate reduction was 58%. The 30-day thrombosis rate after banding was 15 of 397 (3.8%) with a median time to event of 5.5 days (2-102). The re-banding rate within a year was 54 of 398 (14%) with a median time to re-banding of 134 days [56-224]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a univariate screen did not identify any predictors of 30-day thrombosis. Having a forearm radial-cephalic AVF compared to all other access types was protective against need for rebanding at 1 year (OR 0.12 95% CI 0.02-0.92, p = 0.04), as was flow imbalance as the indication for banding (OR 0.43 95% 0.23-0.79, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Precision banding offers an effective, low-morbidity approach for high-flow hemodialysis accesses. Early thrombosis is a rare event after precision banding, although in the long term, one in four patients will require re-banding to maintain control of flow volumes.

Contemporary indications for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the emergence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as the most common approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open aneurysm repair (OAR) remains an important option. This study seeks to define the indications for OAR in the EVAR era and how these indicatioxns effect outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all OAR at a single institution from 2004 to 2019. Preoperative computed tomography scans and operative records were assessed to determine the indication for OAR. These reasons were categorized into anatomical contraindications, systemic factors (connective tissue disorders, contraindication to contrast dye), and patient or surgeon preference (patients who were candidates for both EVAR and OAR). Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We included 370 patients in the analysis; 71.6% (265/370) had at least one anatomic contraindication to EVAR and 36% had two or more contraindications. The most common anatomic contraindications were short aortic neck length (51.6%), inadequate distal seal zone (19.2%), and inadequate access vessels (15.7%). The major perioperative complication rate was 18.1% and the 30-day mortality was 3.0%. No single anatomic factor was identified as a predictor of perioperative complications. Sixty-one patients (16.5%) underwent OAR based on patient or surgeon preference; these patients were younger, had lower incidences of coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and were less likely to require suprarenal cross-clamping compared with patients who had anatomic and/or systemic contraindications to EVAR. The patient or surgeon preference group had a lower incidence of perioperative major complications (8.2% vs 20.1%; P = .034), shorter length of stay (6 days vs 8 days; P < .001) and no 30-day mortalities. The multivariable adjusted risk for 15-year mortality was lower for patient or surgeon preference patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.80; P = .007) compared with those anatomic or systemic contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: Within a population of patients who did not meet instruction for use criteria for EVAR, no single anatomic contraindication was a marker for worse outcomes with OAR. Patients who were candidates for both aortic repair approaches but elected to undergo OAR owing to patient or surgeon preference have very low 30-day mortality and morbidity, and superior long-term survival rates compared with those patients who underwent OAR owing to anatomic and/or systemic contraindications to EVAR.

Comparative analysis of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes across national registries.

OBJECTIVE: In a recent analysis, we discovered lower mortality after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAAA) in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database when compared with previously published reports of other national registries. Understanding differentials in these registries is essential for their utility because such datasets increasingly inform clinical guidelines and health policy. METHODS: The VQI, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and National Inpatient Sample (NIS) databases were queried to identify patients who had undergone elective OAAA between 2013 and 2016. χ2 tests were used for frequencies and analysis of variance for continuous variables. RESULTS: In total, data from 8775 patients were analyzed. Significant differences were seen across the baseline characteristics included. Additionally, the availability of patient and procedural data varied across datasets, with VQI including a number of procedure-specific variables and NIS with the most limited clinical data. Length of stay, primary insurer, and discharge destination differed significantly. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality also varied significantly between datasets: NIS, 5.5%; NSQIP, 5.2%; and VQI, 3.3%; P < .001. Similarly, 30-day mortality was found to be 3.5% in VQI and 5.9% in NSQIP (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There are fundamental important differences in patient demographic/comorbidity profiles, payer mix, and outcomes after OAAA across widely used national registries. This may represent differences in outcomes between institutions that elect to participate in the VQI and NSQIP compared with patient sampling in the NIS. In addition to avoiding direct comparison of information derived from these databases, it is critical these differences are considered when making policy decisions and guidelines based on these "real-world" data repositories.

Evaluation and Management of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome is rare and may be associated with a bony anomaly. Patient presentation can range from mild arm discoloration and claudication to severe limb-threatening ischemia. For patients with subclavian artery dilation without secondary complications, thoracic outlet decompression and arterial surveillance is sufficient. Patients with subclavian artery aneurysms or distal embolization require decompression with reconstruction or thromboembolectomy and distal bypass respectively.

Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Vascular Injury in Contemporary Combat.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of wartime upper-extremity vascular injury (UEVI) has been stable for the past century. The objective of this study is to provide a contemporary review of wartime UEVI, including epidemiologic characterization and description of early limb loss. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was queried to identify US service members who sustained a battle-related UEVI in Afghanistan between January 2009 and December 2015. Anatomic distribution of injury, mechanism of injury (MOI), associated injuries, early management, and early limb loss were analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis identified 247 casualties who sustained 308 UEVIs. The most common injury was to the vessels distal to the brachial bifurcation (63.3%, n = 195), followed by the brachial vessels (27.3%, n = 84) and the axillary vessels (9.4%, n = 29). The predominant MOIs were penetrating explosive fragments (74.1%, n = 183) and gunshot wounds (25.9%, n = 64). Associated fractures were identified in 151 (61.1%) casualties and nerve injuries in 133 (53.8%). Angiography was performed in 91 (36.8%) casualties, and endovascular treatment was performed 10 (4%) times. Temporary vascular shunts were placed in 39 (15.8%) casualties. Data on surgical management were available for 171 injuries and included repair (48%, n = 82) and ligation (52%, n = 89). The early limb loss rate was 12.1% (n = 30). For all casualties sustaining early limb loss, the MOI was penetrating fragments from an explosion; the average injury severity score (ISS) was 32.3, and the mortality was 6.7% (n = 2). In those without amputation, the ISS and mortality were low at 20 and 4.6% (n = 10), respectively. Overall mortality was 4.9% (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: The early limb loss rate was increased compared with initial descriptions from Operation Iraqi Freedom. Amputations are associated with a higher ISS. Improved data capture and fidelity, or differing MOIs, may account for this trend. Proficiency with open and endovascular therapy remains a critical focus for combat casualty care.

Migration of endovascular plug in hybrid repair of dysphagia lusoria.

Aberrant right subclavian artery is the most common brachiocephalic artery congenital abnormality and may result in dysphagia from external compression by the aberrant artery on the esophagus. Repair of this anatomic variant can be performed by both open and hybrid endovascular techniques. This case illustrates a complication of a hybrid repair resulting in proximal migration of a vascular occlusion plug, presenting as recurrent dysphagia and need for open surgical extraction of the plug.

Supraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression in the High-Performance Military Population.

Background: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is a relatively common disorder and often affects younger, physically active populations. The modern American military is a population at risk for the development of nTOS given the intense physical training requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine functional recovery in the active duty military population resulting in full, unrestricted return-to-duty status following supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression with partial first rib resection, partial anterior scalenectomy, and brachial plexus neurolysis. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland to evaluate functional recovery following the surgery management of nTOS. In accordance with the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Institutional Review Board, patient informed consent was obtained for this study. An institutional procedural database (Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Surgery Scheduling System) was queried for consecutive patients who underwent supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression from January 2011 to May 2015. This study involved the completion of two survey instruments: the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand survey and the Cervical Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire. Patients were asked to complete the preoperative surveys and the postoperative surveys. Results: Twenty responses were obtained with a 57% (20/35) overall response rate. Due to the low sample size, results were reported as a median rather than a mean to reduce the bias of outliers. Of the 20 patients who underwent supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression, 85% reported improved functional recovery, 10% demonstrated no improvement but maintained stable functional and symptomatic deficits, and 5% demonstrated worsening of their functional and symptomatic status. The median total preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was calculated at 112 (interquartile range [IQR] 94-122) with an overall score reduction demonstrated by the median total postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score of 50 (IQR 40-71). The median total score reduction of 57 (IQR 28.5-72) represented improved clinical and functional recovery (p < 0.001). The median total preoperative Cervical Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire score was 96 (IQR 74-111) with an overall score reduction revealed by the median total postoperative Cervical Brachial Symptoms Questionnaire score of 28 (IQR 19-45). The median total score reduction of 60 (IQR 23-77) reflected significant functional recovery consistent with clinical improvement (p < 0.001). Around 89% of patients had a predecompression temporary profile secondary to physical debilitation directly related to nTOS. Following surgery, temporary profile status was reduced to 39%. Around 61% of patients were able to complete and pass their service-specific physical fitness testing. Around 56% of patients demonstrated a full return-to-duty status without limitations. Conclusion: Supraclavicular partial first rib resection, partial anterior scalenectomy, and brachial plexus neurolysis results in significant improvement in functional recovery in the military active duty patient population. Prospective studies are warranted to further characterize and define nTOS functional recovery after surgery in this population.

Critical Limb Ischemia Secondary to Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Pediatric Patient: Case Report and Review.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a condition that manifests as venous or arterial thrombosis, as well as complications of pregnancy. APS affecting primarily the arteries is less common when compared to venous complications. We present a case of arterial occlusion resulting in critical limb ischemia (CLI) in a pediatric patient. METHODS: A 14-year old boy presented with worsening right lower extremity pain and ulcerative lesions of his foot. Laboratory analysis revealed a diagnosis of APS. This case report and review of the literature expands our understanding of arterial manifestations of APS in the pediatric patient. RESULTS: The patient was discovered to have proximal occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA), the distal popliteal artery, the anterior tibial artery at the mid-calf, and the posterior tibial artery at the ankle. He underwent a common femoral artery to above-knee-popliteal artery bypass with reversed greater saphenous graft. Follow up after over one-year demonstrated an ABI of 1.0 and no evidence of stenosis in the bypass graft on duplex ultrasound (DUS). CONCLUSIONS: APS is a complex syndrome with a variety of clinical presentations. This case highlights arterial manifestations of APS and reviews the expanding literature to guide improved patient outcomes.