Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Cardiol ; 15(8): 395-405, 2023 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use. AIM: To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables. RESULTS: We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest. CONCLUSION: IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries.

2.
J Clin Exp Hepatol ; 9(4): 484-490, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31571775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Early readmission to the hospital after discharge increases the clinical and economic burden of cirrhosis patients. We aim to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of early hospital readmission among cirrhosis patients among an underserved safety-net health system. METHODS: All consecutive adults with cirrhosis seen at the gastroenterology clinics at our safety-net health system from 2014 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluate to determine rates of 30-day readmission after hospital discharge. Comparison of readmission rates between groups used chi-square testing. Overall predictors of 30-day hospital readmission were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models, with variables included in the model selected a priori based on clinical significance to the outcome. RESULTS: Among 230 cirrhosis patients (63.5% men, 80.6% were nonwhite minorities), 27.1% had chronic hepatitis C virus; 16.0%, chronic hepatitis B virus; 34.2%, alcoholic cirrhosis; and 8.0%, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Overall 30-day hospital readmission rates were 31.3%. There was a trend towards higher rates of 30-day readmission in men than in women (23.9% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.075) and trend towards higher readmission in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites (35.3% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.093). On multivariate regression, hepatic encephalopathy was the strongest positive predictor of early 30-day hospital readmission (odds ratio 4.40, 95% confidence interval 1.25-7.28, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among underserved safety-net cirrhosis patients, 30-day hospital readmission rates were over 30%. Given that presence of hepatic encephalopathy was most strongly correlated with readmissions, targeted interventions to improve management of hepatic encephalopathy may have the greatest impact on improving cirrhosis-related outcomes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...