Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hernia ; 27(6): 1351-1361, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36952050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rate of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) in inguinal hernia repairs (IHR) is estimated to be approximately 5.9% to 38% worldwide. Currently, there are minimal studies on the prophylaxis of POUR after IHR. Pre-operative administration of alpha-blockers such as (but not limited to) Tamsulosin, Prazosin and Alfuzosin has shown promising results in the prevention of POUR in patients undergoing IHR. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of prophylactic alpha-blockade in the prevention of POUR after IHR. METHODS: This study reports the findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using prophylactic alpha-blockade for the prevention of POUR after open and/or laparoscopic IHR in patients aged more than 18 years in all sex groups were included. Multiple databases were searched from inception to October 2021 using the PRISMA flow diagram. Data were extracted and analysed to include eligibility criteria, comparator, intervention, study and participant characteristics. Studies excluded were non-RCT studies and patients with known urinary tract disorders such as benign prostate hypertrophy, urinary incontinence and cancer of the bladder or prostate. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. All effect measures of each data were odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. All studies were pooled using the dichotomous random effects Mantel-Haenszel statistical mode and I2 was used to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was detected using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB-2) involving two independent reviewers. RESULTS: A total of eight RCTs were identified which provided adequate numeric data for incorporation into the meta-analysis. Overall, administration of pre-operative alpha-blocker prior to IHR did not prevent POUR (95% CI 1.20 (0.96-1.49), I2: 34%). Subgroup analysis comparing pre-operative use of prophylactic alpha-blocker in open versus laparoscopic IHR has shown statistically significant reduction of POUR prevention in the laparoscopic group (95% CI 0.66 (0.47-0.92)), I2: 43%). The older age group benefited from pre-operative alpha-blocker use with reduced incidence of POUR post-IHR (95% CI 0.14 (0.08, 0.23), I2: 0%)). Gender did not affect the difference of incidence of POUR post-IHR despite pre-operative alpha-blockers (95% CI 0.62 (0.27, 1.44)), I2: 53%)). CONCLUSION: Overall, this meta-analysis has shown that administration of prophylactic alpha-blockers did not prevent POUR. However, there was statistically significant reduction of POUR in patients undergoing laparoscopic IHR as compared to open, as well as in older patients (age more than 60 years) after administration of pre-operative alpha-blocker. Hence, the use of pre-operative alpha-blocker especially in older patients should be considered and more RCTs should be undertaken.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Urinary Retention , Male , Humans , Aged , Urinary Retention/etiology , Urinary Retention/prevention & control , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Tamsulosin
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 148(6): 1242-4, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12828755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As a topical immunosuppressant, tacrolimus ointment may be beneficial in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis, while avoiding adverse effects related to long-term use of topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. METHODS: Sixteen subjects (15 men and one woman) were enrolled in a 6-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial of daily topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. Following a 2-week washout period for subjects using conventional therapy for seborrhoeic dermatitis, study medication was applied nightly to affected areas until clinical clearance occurred, and then for 7 days thereafter. Lesional extent and severity were assessed at baseline (day 0), at week 2 and at week 6 using the following parameters: (i). clinical assessment of erythema and scaling using a 0-3 scale; (ii). investigator global assessment; (iii). subject global assessment using a 0-6 scale; and (iv). serial photography. RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 (81%) subjects completed the study protocol; three subjects were lost to follow-up at week 6. Relative to the mean baseline value, the mean lesional erythema scores improved by 66.1% and 70.9% at weeks 2 and 6, respectively. Compared with baseline, the mean scaling scores improved by 63.7% at week 2 and 87.8% at week 6. These observations were statistically significant (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon two-sample test). Mean investigator global assessment scores improved by 76.6% at week 2 and 82.7% at week 6, relative to the mean baseline value. Mean subject global assessment scores also improved, by 69.4% at week 2 and 83.5% at week 6, relative to the mean baseline value. Other than transient application site pruritus/burning in two subjects, no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment is efficacious in the short-term treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. Further controlled trials are warranted, to determine its efficacy and safety for this common condition.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Seborrheic/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 44(2): 298-9, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11174391

ABSTRACT

We report a case of recurrent erythema nodosum that is temporally and perhaps causally associated with use of echinacea herbal therapy. The genus Echinacea is traditionally used as an immunostimulant in the prophylaxis and treatment of upper respiratory tract infections. In vitro and in vivo studies of echinacea administration in animal and human-derived models suggest a definite stimulatory effect on the cellular immune system, although the clinical impact of echinacea is still unknown. The public's increasing use of alternative and complementary therapies necessitates that dermatologists be familiar with the cutaneous adverse effects of these agents.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions/etiology , Echinacea/adverse effects , Erythema Nodosum/etiology , Plants, Medicinal , Adult , Echinacea/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Phytotherapy , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...