ABSTRACT
Background: Atrioventricular conduction disturbance occurs in a significant number of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, not all cases are ventricular pacing-dependent. Thus, we aimed to study the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of new ventricular pacing dependency (VpDep) after TAVR. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 130 consecutive transfemoral TAVR cases performed in Ramathibodi Hospital between 2015 and 2020. Three patients with prior ventricular pacing-dependent on cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) were excluded. The endpoints were VpDep at 1 month and all-cause mortality at the follow-up period end in 2021. The effects of variables on VpDep and all-cause mortality were evaluated using multivariate binary logistic regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively. First-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) was considered severe when the PR interval was >300 ms. Results: Of the 127 patients [mean age, 81.8 years; 62.2% females; 67.7% balloon-expandable (BE) device], 7 patients (5.5%) had CIEDs implanted before TAVR that were not ventricular pacing-dependent. TAVR was successfully performed in 126 (99.2%) patients. Periprocedural stroke, cardiac tamponade, and major bleeding occurred in 2 (1.6%), 4 (3.1%), and 4 (3.1%) patients, respectively. The VpDep incidence at 1 month was 7.9% (n=10) among all patients and 34.5% among those with CIEDs (n=29). VpDep was more likely to occur in patients with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) [odds ratio (OR), 21.38; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.28-139.33; P=0.001] and severe 1st degree or Mobitz I AVB (OR, 14.79; 95% CI: 1.65-132.74; P=0.016). After a mean follow-up of 25.8 months [standard deviation (SD), 21.2 months], death from any cause occurred in 18 patients (14.2%). However, VpDep was not associated with an increased mortality. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, pre-existing conduction abnormalities were significantly associated with a higher risk of VpDep. Mortality was similar between patients with and without VpDep.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transvenous Lead Extraction (TLE) is a standard treatment for some late Cardiac Implantable Electronics Device (CIED) complications. The outcome of transvenous lead extraction procedure in Thailand is not robust. METHODS: A Single-center retrospective cohort of TLE procedures performed at Ramathibodi hospital between January 2008 and December 2020 was studied. RESULTS: There were 157 leads from 105 patients who underwent lead removal procedure during the specified period. Data analysis was performed from 79 TLE patients due to incomplete data and lead explant procedure of the excluded subjects. Mean patients' age was 57.7 ± 18.7 years, with 70.9% male. There were 82 pacemaker leads, 35 ICD leads, and 5 CS leads (mean number of leads were 1.54 ± 0.66 per patient), with mean implanted duration of 87.8 ± 68.2 months. Main indication for TLE was infection-related, which accounted for 67.1% of the cases. Overall clinical success rate was 97.5%. Mean operative time was 163.8 ± 69.5 min. Major complications occurred in 4 patients (5.1%) with one in-hospital mortality from severe sepsis. CONCLUSION: TLE using laser sheath and rotating mechanical sheath for transvenous lead extraction is effective and safe, even outside high-volume center.
