Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178880

ABSTRACT

We describe an epidemiologic investigation and successful control measures for the first reported outbreak of blaNDM-1-carrying Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Texas occurring in a veteran with transmission of the same organism and a blaNDM-5-carrying Escherichia coli, respectively, to two roommates and blaNDM-carrying organism/s to a patient cared for by common staff.

2.
Crit Care Med ; 52(3): 357-361, 2024 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180116

ABSTRACT

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services imparts financial penalties for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and other healthcare-acquired infections. Data for this purpose is obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Health Safety Network. We present examples of misclassification of bloodstream infections into CLABSI by the CDC's definition and present the financial implications of such misclassification and potential long-term implications.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cross Infection , Sepsis , Aged , Humans , United States , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Medicare , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/prevention & control , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Infection Control
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(9): 980-987, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37625891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) increased worldwide as health care facilities struggled through the pandemic. We describe our methods in the implementation of a programmatic initiative called serious infectious threat response initiative (SITRI) that was conceptualized to support our staff, to facilitate day-to-day clinical operations related to COVID-19 and to shield our infection prevention and control program (IPC) from excessive COVID-19 work burden to the extent possible to retain routine prevention focused efforts. Post implementation, we sought to understand and quantify the workload and utility of SITRI, IPC burnout and HAI incidence during the implementation period. METHODS: We correlated the number of weekly phone calls with inpatient COVID-19 census, assessed types of calls, staff feedback, IPC burnout, pre- and postpandemic HAI incidence, and the cost. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between SITRI calls and the weekly average COVID-19 census (P = .00026). IPC burnout evaluation indicated improvement in scores for exhaustion and reduced achievement and worsening in score for depersonalization. HAI incidence did not increase. SITRI's cost was $360,000. CONCLUSIONS: Staff solicited SITRI's support in tandem with the COVID-19 burden. Our HAI during the pandemic did not increase while SITRI was operational in contrast to what is published in literature.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Veterans , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Texas/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control
4.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 34(4): 357-364, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039879

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There likely are several predisposing factors to secondary infections in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), some of which may be preventable. The aim of this review is to explore the literature, summarize potential predisposing factors to secondary infections and their incidence. It also summarizes a variety of healthcare scenarios in which different kinds of secondary infections occur. RECENT FINDINGS: Apart from immune dysregulation, severe resource limitations in healthcare settings have made COVID-19 units conducive to a variety of secondary infections. Long-term effect of excess antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients is yet to be studied. Very few studies have assessed secondary infections as the primary outcome measure making it difficult to know the true incidence. Mortality attributable to secondary infections in COVID-19 patients is also unclear. SUMMARY: Incidence of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients is likely higher than what is reported in the literature. Well designed studies are needed to understand the incidence and impact of secondary infections in this patient population. Many of these may be preventable especially now, as personal protective equipment and other healthcare resources are recovering. Infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) must reassess current situation to correct any breaches that could potentially cause more harm in these already vulnerable patients as we brace for a future surge with another pandemic wave.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/etiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Disease Susceptibility , SARS-CoV-2 , Antimicrobial Stewardship , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Clinical Decision-Making , Coinfection/etiology , Disease Management , Health Personnel , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Incidence , Mortality , Standard of Care
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(11): 1419-1422, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When traditional interventions are used in long term care for catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention, residual rates are still high despite a decrease. We conducted a quality improvement study focusing our interventions on patient and staff behavioral patterns identified through a structured huddle process to improve upon the basics for CAUTI prevention. METHODS: Baseline was from January 2016 to March 2017; the intervention period was from April 2017 to June 2020. We implemented a systematic huddle to determine root cause of each CAUTI and applied lessons throughout the facility. We measured the monthly CAUTI incidence per 1000 urinary catheter days and analyzed the reduction in CAUTI during the intervention period. RESULTS: CAUTI decreased by 73% during the intervention period compared to the baseline period, with an IRR of 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11-0.66; P = .004). The number of catheter days per month increased by 4% in the intervention period (17,407 in 39 months) compared to the baseline period (6,440 in 15 months) with IRR of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.07; P = .008). No patterns were noted in organisms responsible for CAUTI. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings stress the importance of looking beyond the traditional interventions for CAUTI prevention in long term care population. By doing this, interventions can be customized for this special population to achieve optimal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Cross Infection , Urinary Tract Infections , Veterans , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Long-Term Care , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(2): ofaa002, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32055636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data evaluating the strategy of suppressing broader-spectrum antibiotic susceptibilities on utilization. Cascade reporting (CR) is a strategy of reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test results in which secondary (eg, broader-spectrum, costlier) agents may only be reported if an organism is resistant to primary agents within a particular drug class. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of ceftriaxone-based cascade reporting on utilization of cefepime and clinical outcomes in patients with ceftriaxone-susceptible Escherichia and Klebsiella clinical cultures. METHODS: We compared post-CR (July 2014-June 2015) with baseline (July 2013-June 2014), evaluating utilization of cefepime, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, ampicillin derivatives, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem; new Clostridium difficile infection; and length of stay (LOS) after the positive culture, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean days of therapy (DOT) among patients who received any antibiotic for cefepime decreased from 1.229 days during the baseline period to 0.813 days post-CR (adjusted relative risk, 0.668; P < .0001). Mean DOT of ceftriaxone increased from 0.864 days to 0.962 days, with an adjusted relative risk of 1.113 (P = .004). No significant differences were detected in other antibiotics including ertapenem and meropenem, demonstrating the direct association of the decrease in cefepime utilization with CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. Average LOS in the study population decreased from 14.139 days to 10.882 days from baseline to post-CR and was found to be statistically significant (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we demonstrated significant association of decreased cefepime utilization with the implementation of a CR based on ceftriaxone susceptibility. We demonstrated the safety of deescalation, with LOS being significantly lower during the post-CR period than in the baseline period, with no change in in-hospital mortality.

7.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(7): 743-746, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29551201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In January 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Health Safety Network (NHSN) changed the definition of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). We evaluated the outcomes of a robust CAUTI prevention program when we performed surveillance using the old definition (before 2015) versus the new definition (after 2015). This is the first study to evaluate how the change in CDC/NHSN definitions affected the outcomes of a CAUTI reduction program. METHODS: Baseline was from January 2012 to September 2014; the intervention period was from October 2014 to February 2016. Staff nurses were trained to be liaisons of infection prevention (Link Nurses) with clearly defined CAUTI prevention goals and with ongoing monthly activities. CAUTI incidence per 1000 catheter days was compared between the baseline and intervention periods, using the 2 definitions. RESULTS: With the new definition, CAUTIs decreased by 33%, from 2.69 to 1.81 cases per 1000 catheter days (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.93; P < .016). With the old definition, CAUTIs increased by 12%, from 3.38 to 3.80 cases per 1000 catheter days (IRR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.88-1.43; P = .348). CONCLUSION: We aggressively targeted CAUTI prevention, but a reduction was observed only with the new definition. Our findings stress the importance of having a reasonably accurate surveillance definition to monitor infection prevention initiatives.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Nurse's Role , Nurseries, Hospital , Terminology as Topic , Tertiary Healthcare , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(11): 1208-1213, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28757085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We studied the effectiveness of an ultraviolet C (UV-C) emitter in clinical settings and compared it with observed terminal disinfection. METHODS: We cultured 22 hospital discharge rooms at a tertiary care academic medical center. Phase 1 (unobserved terminal disinfection) included cultures of 11 high-touch environmental surfaces (HTSs) after terminal room disinfection (AD) and after the use of a UV-C-emitting device (AUV). Phase 2 (observed terminal disinfection) included cultures before terminal room disinfection (BD), AD, and AUV. Zero-inflated Poisson regression compared mean colony forming units (CFU) between the groups. Two-sample proportion tests identified significance of the observed differences in proportions of thoroughly cleaned HTSs (CFU < 5). Significant P value was determined using the Bonferroni corrected threshold of α = .05/12 = .004. RESULTS: We obtained 594 samples. Risk of overall contamination was 0.48 times lower in the AUV group than in the AD group (P < .001), with 1.04 log10 reduction. During phase 1, overall proportion of HTSs with <5 CFUs increased in AUV versus AD by 0.12 (P = .001). During phase 2, it increased in AD versus BD by 0.45 (P < .001), with no significant difference between AD and AUV (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Use of UV-C with standard cleaning significantly reduced microbial burden and improved the thoroughness of terminal disinfection. We found no further benefit to UV-C use if standard terminal disinfection was observed.


Subject(s)
Decontamination/methods , Disinfection/methods , Patients' Rooms , Ultraviolet Rays , Decontamination/instrumentation , Environmental Microbiology , Household Work/methods , Humans
10.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(4): 353-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24548456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We describe a successful interdisciplinary liaison program that effectively reduced health care-acquired (HCA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a university hospital setting. METHODS: Baseline was from January 2006 to March 2008, and intervention period was April 2008 to September 2009. Staff nurses were trained to be liaisons (link nurses) to infection prevention (IP) personnel with clearly defined goals assigned and with ongoing monthly education. HCA-MRSA incidence per 1,000 patient-days (PD) was compared between baseline and intervention period along with total and non-HCA-MRSA, HCA and non-HCA-MRSA bacteremia, and hand soap/sanitizer usage. Hand hygiene compliance was assessed. RESULTS: A reduction in MRSA rates was as follows in intervention period compared with baseline: HCA-MRSA decreased by 28% from 0.92 to 0.67 cases per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.83, P < .001), and HCA-MRSA bacteremia rate was reduced by 41% from 0.18 to 0.10 per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.84, P = .003). Total MRSA rate and MRSA bacteremia rate also showed significant reduction with nonsignificant reductions in overall non-HCA-MRSA and non-HCA-MRSA bacteremia. Hand soap/sanitizer usage and compliance with hand hygiene also increased significantly during IP. CONCLUSION: Link nurse program effectively reduced HCA-MRSA. Goal-defined metrics with ongoing re-education for the nurses by IP personnel helped drive these results.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Nurses , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disinfectants/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization , Hospitals, University , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/organization & administration , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
11.
Crit Care ; 17(2): R41, 2013 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23497591

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We set a goal to reduce the incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections to rate of <1 per 1,000 central line days in a two-year period. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study with historical controls in a 25-bed intensive care unit at a tertiary academic hospital. All patients admitted to the unit from January 2008 to December 2011 (31,931 patient days) were included. A multidisciplinary team consisting of hospital epidemiologist/infectious diseases physician, infection preventionist, unit physician and nursing leadership was convened. Interventions included: central line insertion checklist, demonstration of competencies for line maintenance and access, daily line necessity checklist, and quality rounds by nursing leadership, heightened staff accountability, follow-up surveillance by epidemiology with timely unit feedback and case reviews, and identification of noncompliance with evidence-based guidelines. Molecular epidemiologic investigation of a cluster of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) was undertaken resulting in staff education for proper acquisition of blood cultures, environmental decontamination and daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing for patients. RESULTS: Center for Disease Control/National Health Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) definition was used to measure central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLA-BSI) rates during the following time periods: baseline (January 2008 to December 2009), intervention year (IY) 1 (January to December 2010), and IY 2 (January to December 2011). Infection rates were as follows: baseline: 2.65 infections per 1,000 catheter days; IY1: 1.97 per 1,000 catheter days; the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.74 (95% CI=0.37 to 1.65, P=0.398); residual seven CLA-BSIs during IY1 were VRE faecium blood cultures positive from central line alone in the setting of findings explicable by noninfectious conditions. Following staff education, environmental decontamination and CHG bathing (IY2): 0.53 per 1,000 catheter days; the IRR was 0.20 (95% CI=0.06 to 0.65, P=0.008) with 80% reduction compared to the baseline. Over the two-year intervention period, the overall rate decreased by 53% to 1.24 per 1,000 catheter-days (IRR of 0.47 (95% CI=0.25 to 0.88, P=0.019) with zero CLA-BSI for a total of 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: Residual CLA-BSIs, despite strict adherence to central line bundle, may be related to blood culture contamination categorized as CLA-BSIs per CDC/NHSN definition. Efforts to reduce residual CLA-BSIs require a strategic multidisciplinary team approach focused on epidemiologic investigations of practitioner- or unit-specific etiologies.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units/standards , Tertiary Healthcare/standards , Catheterization, Central Venous/standards , Catheterization, Central Venous/trends , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/trends , Male , Tertiary Healthcare/trends
13.
J Hosp Med ; 8(1): 20-4, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23024066

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fever is typically considered part of the influenza-like illness in hemagglutinin type 1 and neuraminidase type 1 (H1N1/09) influenza. We assessed the proportion of patients that did not have fever as part of their illness prior to hospital presentation. We assessed the role of fever on the delay in hospital presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all hospitalized adult patients with laboratory-confirmed pandemic H1N1/09 at a tertiary care center in the United States from June 1 to December 31, 2009. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 135 study patients (42%) had no fever; 31 (23%) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 9 (7%) died. Those without fever had higher Charlson index (P = 0.01), significantly longer time to hospital presentation (median 4 vs 2 days, P < 0.001), longer time to treatment since the onset of illness (median 5 vs 2 days, P = 0.001), and were more frequently in an ICU (P = 0.01). After adjustment for age (<40 vs ≥40) and Charlson index (0, 1-2, ≥3), patients without fever had significantly increased likelihood of late hospital presentation (>2 days from the onset of illness) (P = 0.001) and also had increased likelihood of ICU stay (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Forty-two percent of patients with laboratory-confirmed H1N1/09 did not have fever as part of their illness prior to hospital presentation. Patients without fever had delayed presentation to the hospital and thus experienced delayed treatment.


Subject(s)
Fever , Influenza, Human/virology , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Adult , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio , Oseltamivir/administration & dosage , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , United States
14.
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov ; 7(1): 19-27, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22211694

ABSTRACT

Multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria are an increasing therapeutic challenge. The beta-lactamases are a group of enzymes that confer resistance to the beta-lactam antibiotics. The carbapenems have been in wide use to treat beta-lactamase producing, multidrug resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the emergence of carbapenemases, enzymes capable of hydrolyzing the carbapenems, has limited our therapeutic options. In the recent years, there has been some development in the discovery of new agents such as boronic acid derivatives, ME1071 and Ca-EDTA that may enhance the activity of existing antibiotics, CTC-96 which reverses antibiotic resistance and polymyxin derivatives with decreased renal toxicity. While global efforts towards new drug development should continue, appropriate use of currently available antibiotics is equally important. In this review, we will discuss the general characteristics of carbapenemases, recent patents with drugs under development and current treatment options.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Carbapenems/pharmacokinetics , Gram-Negative Bacteria/enzymology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Drug Discovery/methods , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Hydrolysis , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
17.
PLoS One ; 6(3): e18166, 2011 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464952

ABSTRACT

Pandemic influenza caused significant increases in healthcare utilization across several continents including the use of high-intensity rescue therapies like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). The severity of illness observed with pandemic influenza in 2009 strained healthcare resources. Because lung injury in ARDS can be influenced by daily management and multiple organ failure, we performed a retrospective cohort study to understand the severity of H1N1 associated ARDS after adjustment for treatment. Sixty subjects were identified in our hospital with ARDS from "direct injury" within 24 hours of ICU admission over a three month period. Twenty-three subjects (38.3%) were positive for H1N1 within 72 hours of hospitalization. These cases of H1N1-associated ARDS were compared to non-H1N1 associated ARDS patients. Subjects with H1N1-associated ARDS were younger and more likely to have a higher body mass index (BMI), present more rapidly and have worse oxygenation. Severity of illness (SOFA score) was directly related to worse oxygenation. Management was similar between the two groups on the day of admission and subsequent five days with respect to tidal volumes used, fluid balance and transfusion practices. There was, however, more frequent use of "rescue" therapy like prone ventilation, HFOV or ECMO in H1N1 patients. First morning set tidal volumes and BMI were significantly associated with increased severity of lung injury (Lung injury score, LIS) at presentation and over time while prior prescription of statins was protective. After assessment of the effect of these co-interventions LIS was significantly higher in H1N1 patients. Patients with pandemic influenza-associated ARDS had higher LIS both at presentation and over the course of the first six days of treatment when compared to non-H1N1 associated ARDS controls. The difference in LIS persisted over the duration of observation in patients with H1N1 possibly explaining the increased duration of mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/virology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/pathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Function Tests , Treatment Outcome
18.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(11): 4678-83, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20713678

ABSTRACT

Pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen that poses therapeutic challenges. Tigecycline alone or in combination with agents such as colestimethate, imipenem, and/or amikacin is being used clinically to treat PDR A. baumannii infections. The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro susceptibility testing by epsilometric (Etest) methods and the checkerboard (CB) method with testing by time-kill analysis. PDR A. baumannii clinical strains representing eight unique pulsed-field gel electrophoresis clones selected from a total of 32 isolates were tested in vitro with tigecycline, colestimethate, imipenem, and amikacin in single- and two-drug combinations by using two different methods of Etest (with a fixed ratio method [method 1] and with the incorporation of the active drug in medium [method 2]) and by using CB. The three-drug combination of imipenem, tigecycline, and amikacin was also tested by CB. These results were compared to time-kill results. Synergy was consistently detected with the imipenem plus colestimethate and tigecycline plus imipenem combinations. The Etest method with active drug incorporated into the agar allowed us to detect synergy even in the presence of the active drug and was more comparable to CB and time-kill tests. Synergy was detected with the three-drug combination of imipenem, tigecycline, and amikacin by both CB and time-kill methods among several tested clones. These findings indicate the utility of synergy testing to predict activity of specific antibiotic combinations against PDR A. baumannii.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Acinetobacter baumannii/genetics , Amikacin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Synergism , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Genotype , Humans , Imipenem/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Minocycline/pharmacology , Tigecycline
19.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 27(7): 804-7, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18582814

ABSTRACT

We present 6 cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in lung transplant recipients. All cases were treated with imipenem and/or non-traditional antibiotics, such as tigecycline and colistimethate, and had different microbiologic and clinical outcomes. Prior treatment with broad-spectrum anti-microbial therapy was the single most likely risk factor for the development of infection due to MDR Acinetobacter baumannii. Ideal preventive and therapeutic strategies for this pathogen in lung transplant recipients require further study.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Colistin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Imipenem/therapeutic use , Male , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Tigecycline , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...