Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 34(3 Suppl): 119-21, 2012.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23405596

ABSTRACT

The risk assessment in apiculture points out methodological problems due to discontinuities and variability of exposure. This study analyzes a comprehensive set of potential determinants influencing the biomechanical risks in apiarists using recognized technical standards to ensure the technical-scientific accuracy; it offers a simplified methodological toolkit to be used in the risk assessment process and provides a user-friendly computer application. The toolkit asks the beekeeper to specify, for each month, the total number of hours worked, specifying the distribution among different tasks. As a result, the application calculates the average index risk and the peak index risk. The evidence of the study indicates that there are activities in this occupational area with biomechanical risks that remain for some tasks, while reducing the exposure time.


Subject(s)
Beekeeping , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods
2.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 33(3 Suppl): 28-30, 2011.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23393793

ABSTRACT

Exposure to chemicals in unusual work shifts can require adjustment of the occupational limit values to assure adequate protection of the exposed workers. The study introduces a comparative analysis of the mathematical and pharmacokinetic models to calculate the adjustment factors and provides a computer-assisted toolkit to obtain the reduction factors for exposures to single chemical agent and mixtures in unusual work schedule.


Subject(s)
Maximum Allowable Concentration , Models, Theoretical , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Mathematics , Pharmacokinetics , Work Schedule Tolerance
3.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 33(3 Suppl): 31-4, 2011.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23393794

ABSTRACT

Following literature data the evaluation CLP classification and labelling criteria doesn't support the decision to classify respirable crystalline silica (RCS) as carcinogen and suggests to consider RCS as:--STOT (Specific Target Organ Toxicant) RE (Repeated Exposure) cat.l by inhalation in case of concentration > or = 10%--STOT RE cat. 2 by inhalation in case of concentration 1 divided by 10%--Not classifiable as dangerous for human in case of concentration < 1%.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens , Drug Labeling , Drug Packaging , Occupational Exposure , Silicon Dioxide/classification , Drug Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Packaging/legislation & jurisprudence , Italy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...