Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 34: 23-27, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30191061

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Emergency appendicectomy (EA) is a commonly performed operation, with an increasing number of EAs being performed as day-case. The aim of this study is to establish if there is a need for post-operative follow-up and if this could prevent adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EA at multiple centres over a six-month period was undertaken. They were contacted by telephone and a standardised questionnaire was used to ascertain post-operative outcomes, including duration of analgesia use, duration before return to normal daily activity (ADLs), surgical site infection rates (SSI) and rates of re-presentation to medical services. Patients were stratified into those who underwent laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy, smokers versus non-smokers, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Patients undergoing open surgery (vs. laparoscopic surgery) required analgesia for significantly longer periods, with a significantly longer return to ADLs. Smokers, when compared to non-smokers experienced a significantly longer return to work/school; and significantly higher risk of SSI and re-presenting to accident & emergency; as did patients with a BMI >30 when compared to those with a BMI <30. CONCLUSION: Most patients do not need formal outpatient assessment after EA. However, there is clearly a subset of higher risk patients who may benefit from this - patients who are smokers or obese. They have prolonged recovery times, and are at greater risk of SSI. Earlier surgical outpatient follow-up of these patients could prevent adverse outcomes.

2.
Int Surg ; 99(4): 374-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25058768

ABSTRACT

Historically rapid-access colorectal clinics have had high proportions of nonconforming referrals from primary care physicians, which calls into question the clinics' efficacy. We aim to determine the effectiveness of our rapid-access flexible sigmoidoscopy clinic, and the adherence to the referral guidelines for suspected bowel cancer by general practitioners. We performed a 3-month retrospective audit to evaluate (1) the proportion of patients seen within 2 weeks, (2) the appropriateness of referrals, (3) the proportion of patients with findings, and (4) the proportion of patients who had further tests. A total of 59 patients (19 male, 40 female; age 35-86 years) were included in the study. All were offered an appointment within 2 weeks. Forty-one cases (82%) were appropriate referrals. Twenty-eight patients (47%) had pathology at sigmoidoscopy. Cancer pick-up rate was 6%. Thirty-seven patients (74%) had further investigations. We determined that our rapid-access clinic for symptomatic patients has high diagnostic accuracy and that access to early investigation is being used appropriately by general practitioners. In the current climate of spending cuts and streamlining services, our study confirms we are meeting targets for delivery of our colorectal service. The majority of referrals under the 2-week rule are appropriate. Rapid access to early investigation is being used appropriately by general practitioners contrasting previous studies with high proportions of nonconforming referrals.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sigmoidoscopy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, District , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 9: 44, 2011 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21524289

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently developed immunohistochemical markers have revolutionised the classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) whilst tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib) have had a significant impact on the treatment of advanced tumours. We review the clinicopathological features of previously resected mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract in our institution to 1) reclassify the histological diagnosis of those stained prior to c-kit availability; 2) perform survival analysis to identify prognostic factors, and 3) to consider the implications for patients. METHODS: Clinicopathological records of patients with a diagnosis of mesenchymal tumours treated between May 1992 and April 2007 were reviewed. RESULTS: 82 patients were reviewed. 26 (32%) were reclassified as GISTs following c-kit immunostaining and a further 14 patients were treated for GIST up to April 2007 (Total: 40 patients; 21 males and 19 females, mean age 67, range 30-92 years). 36 (90%) underwent complete resection. 5-year survival of patients with GIST alone was 80%. Females had a better median survival (M: F 43 months: 73 months). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of c-kit staining allowed 32% of previously diagnosed mesenchymal tumours to be reclassified as GISTs. This may have implications for the follow-up of patients diagnosed prior to the availability of this method.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/biosynthesis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 45(2): e17-20, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20152333

ABSTRACT

Phyllodes tumor is uncommon in children, and the malignant form is rare. There have only been a few cases of benign phyllodes tumor reported in peripubertal children and only one malignant case. We report the second case of malignant phyllodes tumor in a premenarchal 11-year-old girl.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Phyllodes Tumor/pathology , Phyllodes Tumor/surgery , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Menarche , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Phyllodes Tumor/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome
5.
World J Emerg Surg ; 4: 44, 2009 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19948016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Femoral hernias are relatively uncommon, however they are the most common incarcerated abdominal hernia, with strangulation of a viscus carrying significant mortality. Classically three approaches are described to open femoral hernia repair: Lockwood's infra-inguinal, Lotheissen's trans-inguinal and McEvedy's high approach. Each approach describes a separate skin incision and dissection to access the femoral sac. The decision as to which approach to adopt, predominantly dependent on the suspicion of finding strangulated bowel, is often a difficult one and in our opinion an unnecessary one. METHODS: We propose a technique for open femoral hernia repair that involves a single skin incision 1 cm above the medial half of the inguinal ligament that allows all of the above approaches to the hernia sac depending on the operative findings. Thus the repair of simple femoral hernias can be performed from below the inguinal ligament. If found, inguinal hernias can be repaired. More importantly, resection of compromised bowel can be achieved by accessing the peritoneal cavity with division of the linea semilunaris 4 cm above the inguinal ligament. This avoids compromise of the inguinal canal, and with medial retraction of the rectus abdominis muscle enables access to the peritoneal cavity and compromised bowel. DISCUSSION: This simple technique minimises the preoperative debate as to which incision will allow the best approach to the femoral hernia sac, allow for alteration to a simple inguinal hernia repair if necessary, and more importantly obviate the need for further skin incisions if compromised bowel is encountered that requires resection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...