Investigation Into Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Patterns of Loop Diuretics in a Nationally Representative Outpatient Population.

BACKGROUND: Loop diuretic therapy effectively treats edema related to heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and liver impairment; however, evidence supporting other indications is lacking. For indications such as hypertension or dependent edema or treatment of adverse events associated with other medications, the benefits likely do not outweigh the risks, putting patients at an unacceptably high risk of poor outcomes. STUDY QUESTION: What is the proportion of loop diuretic prescribing that occurs in the absence of a diagnosis of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, liver impairment, or other evidence-based indications? STUDY DESIGN: This was a national, retrospective, cross-sectional investigation conducted using the National Ambulatory Care Survey from 2013 to 2016. Outpatient visits for patients aged 18 years or older prescribed with loop diuretics were included. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary end point was the frequency of potentially inappropriate loop diuretic prescribing. The secondary end point was a multivariable regression model that identified predictors of potentially inappropriate loop diuretic utilization. RESULTS: This analysis identified 5261 outpatient visits conducted during the study period in which loop diuretics were prescribed. Of these, 3648 visits (65.8% of weighted visits) were of patients without a history of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or liver impairment. Positive predictors included age older than 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.13), concomitant calcium channel blocker (OR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.84), sodium-containing medication use (OR 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.25), and office visit with a cardiology specialist (OR 2.84; 95% CI, 2.31-3.50). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identified that loop diuretics are prescribed in the absence of evidence-based indications more frequently than they are prescribed for them. This prescribing pattern creates a unique opportunity for clinicians to optimize patient care. Further study of the outcomes associated with this prescribing pattern is warranted.

Comparison of Narrow-Versus Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Elderly Patients With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available regarding the choice of empiric antibiotic therapy in elderly patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The primary objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of elderly patients receiving broad- versus narrow-spectrum antibiotics during hospitalization for AECOPD. DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective, cohort analysis was performed. Inpatients 65 years and older with a primary discharge diagnosis of AECOPD who received ≥48 hours of antibiotic therapy were included in the study population. Patients were compared based on the spectrum of their antibiotic therapy. Narrow-spectrum antibiotics included: azithromycin, doxycycline, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, or aminopenicillin. The primary outcome was a composite of mechanical ventilation 48 hours after admission, transfer to the intensive care unit 48 hours after admission, 30-day chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) readmission, and oxygen saturation less than 90% on room air or increased oxygen requirements from baseline 48 hours after admission. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-three patients were included in this analysis; 127 patients were included in the narrow-spectrum group, and 126 patients were included in the broad-spectrum group. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were similarly distributed in each group. The incidence of the primary composite outcome occurred in 50 (39.3%) and 60 (47.6%) of patients in the narrow- and broad-spectrum groups, respectively (P = .19). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference was found in the primary outcome in inpatients aged ≥65 years with AECOPD who received empiric broad-spectrum or narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

Prevalence, predictors and trends of opioid prescribing for lower back pain in United States emergency departments.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Current evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute low back pain (ALBP) recommend the use of opioid medications only after failure of nonpharmacological therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and skeletal muscle relaxants and after thorough evaluation of risks and benefits. Despite this recommendation and the state of the opioid epidemic in the United States (US), opioids remain a common drug of choice for ALBP in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to quantify the prevalence and identify predictors of opioid prescribing for acute lower back pain (ALBP) in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. METHODS: This was a national, cross-sectional study of the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey from 2013-2016. ED visits for patients aged ≥18 years treated for ALBP were included. Patients presenting with specified reasons that an opioid may be indicated were excluded. The primary endpoint was frequency of opioids prescribed. A multivariate logistic regression model identified patient- and provider-level predictors of opioid use. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This analysis included 2260 visits for ALBP. Opioids were prescribed in 32.3% of visits. Positive predictors of opioid prescribing were pain score of 7-10 (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.26-2.70), and patients seen in the Southern (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.47-4.36) or Western US (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.19-3.70). Opioids were prescribed less often to patients who received a NSAID or acetaminophen (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.28-0.52 and OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.01-0.10, respectively). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Opioid prescribing rates for ALBP remain high and the predictors identified demonstrate that this prescribing pattern is not uniformly distributed across the patient and provider characteristics studied.

National Trends in Statin Medication Prescribing in Patients With a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines support statin therapy post-stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); however, previously reported utilization rates are suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the incidence of statin usage in patients with a documented stroke or TIA while identifying predictors of statin use. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study utilizing data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. RESULTS: A total of 2963 unweighted visits were included in the analysis, representing a total of 52 645 000 office visits when weighted. Statin therapy was initiated or continued in 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.4-39.0%) of office visits. Upon multivariate analysis, positive predictors of statin therapy included a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.40-5.41), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.69-3.76), aspirin therapy (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.40-2.93), and clopidogrel therapy (OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.69-4.02). Negative predictors of statin therapy included office visits with neurologists when compared to visits with primary care practitioners (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.90) and office visits in rural areas when compared to office visits in urban areas (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.41-0.99). CONCLUSION: Various factors impact statin therapy use with overall utilization being suboptimal, highlighting an opportunity for medication optimization.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Utilization in a Nationally Representative Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Outpatient Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve survival among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, studies have identified low utilization rates. No study has evaluated the prevalence and predictors of MRA prescribing in a nationally representative outpatient cohort. STUDY QUESTION: What is the prevalence and predictors of MRA prescribing among outpatients with HFrEF in the United States? STUDY DESIGN: A national cross-sectional secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2007 to 2014 including all office visits for HFrEF in patients aged >55 years. Office visits involving patients with any history of chronic renal failure and hyperkalemia were excluded. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary end point was the MRA prescribing rate. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify predictors of use. RESULTS: In total, 1259 visits were eligible for inclusion, representing more than 30 million visits when weighted. MRAs were initiated or continued in 11.1% of HFrEF visits (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8-13.8). In the full model, predictors included diabetes mellitus (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.12-4.61), Northeast region (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.74), and ≥4 chronic conditions (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.71). Among symptomatic patients, predictors included non-Hispanic black patients (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.81-11.43), patients aged 65-74 years (OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.53-7.44), and office systolic blood pressure >130 mm Hg (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.60). Physician specialty, visit year, patient sex, and payor type were not significant predictors of MRA utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant data support the use of MRA in HFrEF, utilization is lower than previously estimated.

Efficacy of Tramadol for Pain Management in Patients Receiving Strong Cytochrome P450 2D6 Inhibitors.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Tramadol is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 to form an active metabolite that exhibits its analgesic effect. Medications that inhibit this enzyme are used often in practice, yet the clinical impact of this interaction on the analgesic effects of tramadol has yet to be fully described. The objective was to determine whether a clinically relevant decrease in pain control is observed in patients taking scheduled tramadol concomitantly with a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large health care system. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-two adult inpatients who received scheduled tramadol for at least 24 hours with (76 patients) or without (76 patients) a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor between January 1, 2012, and February 28, 2017, were included in the analysis. Patients hospitalized for opioid use disorder or those receiving substandard dosing of tramadol were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was mean breakthrough opiate consumption in the presence and absence of CYP2D6 inhibitors. Secondary outcomes included mean pain scores, length of hospital stay, tramadol discontinuation rates, and prespecified subgroup analyses based on patient sex, race, and specific CYP2D6 inhibitor administered. Patients receiving concurrent CYP2D6 inhibitors required significantly more breakthrough morphine milligram equivalents per day compared with patients receiving scheduled tramadol without CYP2D6 inhibitors (geometric mean ± SD 18.2 ± 6.3 vs 5.7 ± 6.7 mg morphine milligram equivalents, p<0.001). No significant differences existed between cohorts for mean pain score, length of hospital stay, or tramadol discontinuation rate. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a clinically relevant decrease in the efficacy of tramadol when used for pain control in patients receiving a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor. These results should encourage clinicians to review medication lists for this interaction and adjust regimens accordingly to ensure adequate pain control.

Prevalence and Predictors of Benzodiazepine Monotherapy in Patients With Depression: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Depression guidelines discourage benzodiazepine monotherapy and limit use to short-term adjunctive therapy with antidepressants; however, patients with depression continue to receive benzodiazepine monotherapy. The prevalence and predictors of this prescribing pattern have not been described previously and are warranted to assist clinicians in identifying patients at highest risk of receiving benzodiazepine monotherapy. METHODS: A national, cross-sectional analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012 to 2015 was performed for adults treated for depression. Depression was identified using a survey item specifically assessing the presence of depression. Office visits involving patients with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, or pregnancy were identified by ICD-9 code or specific survey item and were excluded. The primary endpoint was benzodiazepine monotherapy prescribing rate defined as initiation or continuation of a benzodiazepine in the absence of any antidepressant agent. A multivariate logistic regression model was created to identify variables associated with benzodiazepine monotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 9,426 unweighted visits were eligible for inclusion. Benzodiazepine monotherapy was identified in 9.3% of patients treated for depression (95% CI, 8.2%-10.6%). Predictors of benzodiazepine monotherapy included age of 45-64 years (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.91), epilepsy-related office visit (OR = 5.34; 95% CI, 1.39-20.44), anxiety-related office visit (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.23-2.27), underlying pulmonary disease (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.09-1.87), and concomitant opiate prescribing (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 2.01-4.06). Psychiatrists were less likely to prescribe benzodiazepine monotherapy than were other providers (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepine monotherapy is utilized in nearly 1 in 10 patients treated for depression. Adults aged 45 to 65 years, patients prescribed opioids, patients seen by primary care providers, and those with underlying anxiety, epilepsy, or pulmonary disorders are at highest risk.

Impact of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee and Total Hip Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the net clinical benefit of tranexamic acid use in patients undergoing total knee or total hip replacement. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing total knee or total hip replacement. The primary outcome was the net clinical benefit of tranexamic acid use. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, incidence of venous thromboembolism, change in hemoglobin, and number of units of blood transfused. RESULTS: Four hundred and six patients were screened for inclusion and 327 patients met inclusion criteria; 174 patients received tranexamic acid versus 153 patients who received usual care. Tranexamic acid demonstrated a positive net clinical benefit versus usual care (40.8% vs 13.7%, P < .01) but did not affect length of stay (3.39 vs 3.37 days, respectively, P = .76). Venous thromboembolism was comparable between groups (2.3% vs 0.7%, P = .38). Average change in hemoglobin and need for transfusion were lower in the treatment group versus the usual care group, respectively (3.46 vs 4.26 mg/dL, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Tranexamic acid demonstrated a significant benefit in decreasing change in hemoglobin as well as the need for blood transfusion with no increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee or total hip replacement.

Prevalence and Predictors of Metformin Prescribing in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: Metformin is the first-line oral type 2 diabetes treatment. Despite an abundance of evidence, metformin is routinely underused. This study evaluated the rates of metformin use in an appropriate outpatient type 2 diabetes population and identified predictors of metformin use. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Office visits involving patients aged 18-79 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes were included, and visits involving patients with a diagnosis of chronic renal failure or heart failure were excluded. The primary outcome was metformin-prescribing rate. Multivariate logistic regression identified variables associated with metformin prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 2348 patient visits were eligible for inclusion, representing 88,671,714 office visits nationally. Metformin was continued or initiated in 40.6% of these visits. The strongest independent predictors of metformin prescribing were insulin use (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.47), presence of four or more chronic conditions (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34-0.98), patients with Medicare insurance (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.83), visit with a surgical specialist (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.61) or a medical specialist (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38-0.92), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.28-3.22). CONCLUSION: Metformin-prescribing rates are low, particularly in patients receiving insulin, with Medicare insurance, seen by medical or surgical specialists, or with four or more chronic conditions. The observed low rates of metformin use represent an important opportunity to improve the quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Economic and patient satisfaction outcomes of a layered learning model in a small community hospital.

PURPOSE: Results of a study of economic and patient satisfaction outcomes of implementing a "layered learning model" (LLM) in a community hospital are presented. METHODS: An LLM consisting of a clinical pharmacist, two postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residents, and pharmacy students participating in rounds and providing patient education was implemented at a small community hospital. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean total drug cost per discharge in cases managed by physicians who rounded with pharmacy representatives (the intervention group) and cases managed by physicians who rounded with no pharmacist present (the control group). Secondary outcomes were drug expenditures associated with eight common diagnoses and patient satisfaction scores in medication education domains of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The intervention-group data comprised 2737 hospital discharges, as compared with 3983 discharges for the control group. The geometric mean total drug cost per discharge was $161.52 for the intervention group, as compared with $210.15 for the control group (difference, $48.63; p < 0.001); drug costs for pneumonia and urinary tract infection were significantly lower for the intervention group. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly improved in the intervention group relative to baseline scores (8th percentile versus 39th percentile, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the LLM in a small community hospital reduced medication costs and improved HCAHPS patient satisfaction scores.

Effect of Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Phytonadione on Length of Stay for Patients in Need of Urgent Warfarin Reversal.

This institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of intravenous versus subcutaneous phytonadione on length of stay in hospitalized patients requiring urgent warfarin reversal. All patients were 18 years or older, on warfarin therapy with an international normalized ratio (INR) between 3.1 and 10.0, and had warfarin therapy restarted at discharge. Patients who received intramuscular or oral phytonadione, phytonadione by more than 1 route, fresh frozen plasma, or any other blood products containing clotting factors, patients with active or severe liver disease, and patients who received other forms of anticoagulation were excluded. A total of 4425 patients receiving phytonadione were evaluated and 79 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the intravenous and subcutaneous groups, including mean age, gender, warfarin indication, Charlson comorbidity index, and indication for phytonadione. Geometric mean length of stay in the intravenous group was 211.7 hours compared with 191.0 hours in the subcutaneous group (P = 0.47). Though intravenous phytonadione administration resulted in significantly lower INRs at all time points <36 hours, geometric mean time to restart of warfarin therapy was not impacted (66.3 hours vs. 64.1 hours, P = 0.72). Despite demonstrating significantly greater INR reductions, hospital length of stay and time to restart of warfarin therapy were not improved with the administration of intravenous over subcutaneous phytonadione.

Coaching for Success: A Residency Search Primer and Update for Preceptors and Faculty.

Pharmacy residency programs have become increasingly competitive in recent years, and changes to the residency search and application process have altered the process for matching with a residency. In this article, major residency topics, from the benefits of residency training to searching for and ranking programs, are summarized. A discussion of tips and tricks for applying for residencies and interviewing for positions is included along with specific suggestions developed with data following the implementation of the Pharmacy Online Residency Centralized Application Service (PhORCAS). The article is organized in a question and answer format to help facilitate understanding of key concepts and common questions that may arise from applicants. Many changes have taken place in the residency search and application process in recent years, and the process of obtaining a residency is complex. Residency applicants and those advising applicants may find value in the answers to commonly asked residency application questions to help ensure the greatest chance of a successful residency match.