Chromosomal translocation t(8;12) induces aberrant HMGIC expression in aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva.

Benign mesenchymal neoplasms associated with rearrangements of the DNA architectural factor gene HMGIC on chromosome 12 include lipomas, uterine leiomyomata, pulmonary chondroid hamartomas, endometrial polyps, salivary gland pleomorphic adenomas, and breast fibroadenomas. Although HMGIC also has been implicated in the pathobiology of aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva, the molecular mechanisms pertaining to this neoplasm are unclear. Tissue from a recurrent aggressive angiomyxoma was investigated by cytogenetic and expression analysis for HMGIC and HMGIY. The trypsin-Giemsa-banded karyotype showed a clonal translocation between chromosomes 8 and 12 [46,XX,t(8;12)(p12;q15)]. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with whole chromosome paint probes for chromosomes 8 and 12 excluded cryptic involvement of other chromosomes. The chromosome 12 breakpoint was mapped with two-color FISH analysis using cosmid probes at the 5' and 3' termini of HMGIC. Both cosmid probes showed hybridization to the normal chromosome 12 and the der(12) chromosome, indicating that the breakpoint was 3' (telomeric) to the gene. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis revealed HMGIC expression in the tumor, and immunohistochemistry localized HMGIC expression to the tumor's spindle cells. Like numerous benign mesenchymal tumors, this locally aggressive tumor is associated with rearrangements near or within HMGIC, but chimeric gene formation was not required for tumorigenesis. Inappropriate expression of this DNA binding protein, however, may be important in the pathobiology of this tumor. Understanding the pathogenetic mechanism may also be helpful in developing new diagnostic tools for identifying residual disease.

Dysregulation of HMGIC in a uterine lipoleiomyoma with a complex rearrangement including chromosomes 7, 12, and 14.

Uterine lipoleiomyomas are extremely rare tumors consisting of a mixture of mature adipocytes and smooth muscle cells. Using G-banding and FISH, we characterized a complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 14 in one of these tumors. The region 14q23-24 was inserted into the long arm of the derivative chromosome 12, between the 3' end of HMGIC and 7q21-22, another region often rearranged in uterine leiomyomas. Other portions of chromosomes 12 and 14 were involved in derivative chromosomes 7, 11, 12, and 14. A chromosome 8 was involved in a three-way rearrangement including the derivative 7, a ring chromosome 10, and a small derivative chromosome 8 bearing segments of chromosomes 10 and 11. No abnormality of chromosome 5 was detected, in contrast to two previously reported cytogenetic analyses of uterine lipoleiomyoma. The consistent finding of chromosomes 12 and 14 on different derivatives indicates that the t(12;14) was a primary event. In addition, immunohistochemical studies showed that HMGI-C was aberrantly expressed in this tumor. These observations suggest that uterine lipoleiomyomas have a pathogenetic origin similar to that of typical leiomyomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:209-215, 2000.

Expression of HMGIY in three uterine leiomyomata with complex rearrangements of chromosome 6.

Uterine leiomyomata (UL) are a major public health problem, yet little is known about their etiology. Genetic factors likely influence UL development and growth; for example, approximately 40% of UL have chromosomal abnormalities detectable by conventional cytogenetic analysis, including t(12;14)(q15;q23-24), rearrangements involving the short arm of chromosome 6 and interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 7. Two high-mobility group (HMG) protein genes, HMGIC and HMGIY, located at 12q15 and 6p21.3, respectively, are involved in rearrangements in various mesenchymal tumors including UL. In this study, we investigated HMGIY expression in three UL with complex cytogenetic rearrangements of 6p21.3 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and electrophoretic shift assay (EMSA). Our findings suggest that there are multiple mechanisms for HMGIY dysregulation, which may include post-translational modification of the hmgiy protein and dysregulation due to different translocation partners. Furthermore, the mechanism dysregulating HMGIY in UL with 6p21.3 and 14q23-24 rearrangements may be similar to the mechanism dysregulating HMGIC in UL characterized as t(12;14)(q15;q23-24), because of the common involvement of an HMG gene and a gene at 14q23-24.