Response to netakimab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients with different baseline C-reactive protein, sacroiliitis evaluated by MRI and peripheral joint involvement status: a post-hoc analysis of the ASTERA study.

OBJECTIVES: Netakimab is a humanised camelid-derived monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A. Here, we report the results of post-hoc analysis of the ASTERA phase 3 study (NCT03447704, February 27, 2018) in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) grouped by baseline C-reactive protein (CRP), baseline sacroiliac joint (SIJ) inflammation through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or presence of peripheral arthritis (PA). METHODS: In this double-blinded, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ASTERA study, 228 adult patients with active r-axSpA received 120 mg of subcutaneous netakimab or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2, and thereafter every other week. For the subanalysis, 16-week data of 114 netakimab-treated patients with the available baseline CRP and SIJ MRI were grouped by normal (<5 mg/L) or abnormal (≥5 mg/L) CRP, by the grade of sacroiliitis (SI) based on the SPARCC MRI score <2 (MRI-SI-) or ≥2 (MRI-SI+), or by the presence of PA. ASAS-recommended activity, spinal mobility, and function endpoints for r-axSpA were analysed. RESULTS: At week 16, an improvement in all the outcomes was similar for MRI-SI- and MRI-SI+ patients, except for a change in ASspi-MRI-a which was significantly greater in MRI-SI+. Netakimab was effective regardless of baseline CRP and PA. For patients with CRP ≥5 mg/L, a more pronounced decline in r-axSpA activity was observed with a trend towards the most prominent improvement in ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI for patients with CRP >20 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous netakimab is effective in patients with r-axSpA irrespective of baseline CRP and inflammation on SIJ MRI. The benefit in patients with high CRP (>20 mg/L) was more pronounced.

Primary efficacy of netakimab, a novel interleukin-17 inhibitor, in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis in adults.

OBJECTIVES: Netakimab (NTK) is a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A, previously investigated in a phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers. Here, we report the results of a phase 2 trial, conducted to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), to establish a therapeutic dose of NTK in a target population of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: 89 patients with active AS, despite non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drug treatment, were randomised to receive 40, 80 or 120 mg of subcutaneous NTK or placebo at weeks 0, 1, 2 and q2wk thereafter until week 12. The primary endpoint was to achieve a proportion of patients with ≥20% improvement in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis. RESULTS: Rates of ASAS20 response at week 16 for NTK with 95%CI for difference in ASAS20 rates NTK vs. placebo were 72.73% [1.69%;58.05%], 81.82% [12.36%;65.56%], 90.91% [23.71%;72.39%] at doses of 40, 80 and 120 mg. The response rate in the placebo arm was 42.86%. The pre-specified margin of clinically non-meaningful difference was 10%. Superiority to placebo was confirmed for doses 80 and 120 mg. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were lymphocytosis, neutropenia, and asymptomatic bacteriuria. No dose-dependent toxicity or serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. The most effective dose with the fastest response onset and favourable safety profile was 120 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained demonstrate the efficacy and favourable safety profile of NTK in active AS. Clinical development of NTK will be continued in a phase 3 trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 1-year treatment with NTK 120 mg in patients with AS.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis facing sick leave or work disability meet varying regulations: a study among rheumatologists and patients from 44 European countries.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and explore differences in formal regulations around sick leave and work disability (WD) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as perceptions by rheumatologists and patients on the system's performance, across European countries. METHODS: We conducted three cross-sectional surveys in 50 European countries: one on work (re-)integration and social security (SS) system arrangements in case of sick leave and long-term WD due to RA (one rheumatologist per country), and two among approximately 15 rheumatologists and 15 patients per country on perceptions regarding SS arrangements on work participation. Differences in regulations and perceptions were compared across categories defined by gross domestic product (GDP), type of social welfare regime, European Union (EU) membership and country RA WD rates. RESULTS: Forty-four (88%) countries provided data on regulations, 33 (75%) on perceptions of rheumatologists (n=539) and 34 (77%) on perceptions of patients (n=719). While large variation was observed across all regulations across countries, no relationship was found between most of regulations or income compensation and GDP, type of SS system or rates of WD. Regarding perceptions, rheumatologists in high GDP and EU-member countries felt less confident in their role in the decision process towards WD (ß=-0.5 (95% CI -0.9 to -0.2) and ß=-0.5 (95% CI -1.0 to -0.1), respectively). The Scandinavian and Bismarckian system scored best on patients' and rheumatologists' perceptions of regulations and system performance. CONCLUSIONS: There is large heterogeneity in rules and regulations of SS systems across Europe in relation to WD of patients with RA, and it cannot be explained by existing welfare regimes, EU membership or country's wealth.

The administration of low doses of rituximab followed by hydroxychloroquine, prednisone and low doses of mycophenolate mofetil is an effective therapy in Latin American patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: In Latin America, the medical attention directed to systemic autoimmune diseases competes with a budget designed to fight poverty, lack of education, etc. In this context, the access to treatments recommended internationally are expensive and limited; therefore, research of methods that make these treatments cheaper is of paramount importance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the 24-month clinical outcome of patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who received low doses of rituximab (RTX), followed by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), prednisone and low doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS: Forty-six patients with active SLE received 500 mg of RTX (together with 500 mg of methylprednisolone as a premedication) administered on two occasions 2 weeks apart, followed by HCQ (200-400 mg/day), prednisone and MMF (500-1000 mg/day) during a 24-month follow-up period. Clinical outcome was assessed using the MEX-SLE Disease Activity Index (MEX-SLEDAI) and serial serologic measurements. Remission was defined as MEX-SLEDAI scores 0-1, mild disease activity 2-5, moderate disease activity 6-9, severe 10-13, and very severe 14 or more. RESULTS: Disease activity decreased over time with treatment. At baseline, 19 (41.3%) patients had very severe, 16 (34.8%) severe, and 9 (19.6%) moderate disease activity. Improvement on disease activity was detected at 3 months, since 9 (19.6%) patients reached disease remission after this period of time and remission increased to 16 (34.8%) patients at 6 months, 19 (41.3%) at 1 year, and 23 (50%) at 2 years of follow-up (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The administration of low doses of RTX followed by HCQ, prednisone and low doses of MMF is an effective therapy in Latin American patients with active SLE.